1,499 research outputs found

    Functions and mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs in lung cancer

    Get PDF

    Characterization of genomic perturbation sensitivity using 1000 genomes population

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2018. 2. ๊น€์ฃผํ•œ.์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ : ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์€ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ์œ ์ „์ฒด ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ ๊ต๋ž€๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์˜ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ˜•์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค€๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ์ฐจ์„ธ๋Œ€ ์—ผ๊ธฐ์„œ์—ด๋ถ„์„ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ์—์„œ ๋ฐํ˜€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋“ฏ, ํ•œ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ์œ ์ „์ฒด๋Š” ์ ์–ด๋„ 300๋งŒ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ์ „์ฒด ๊ต๋ž€์„ ํ•ด์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ต๋ž€์— ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•œ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ์ „์‚ฌ์ฒด ๊ต๋ž€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ 1000 ์œ ์ „์ฒด ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•ด ๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ์˜์—ญ ๋‚ด ๋น„ ๋™์ผ ๋ณ€์ด์˜ ์‹œํ”„ํŠธ ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์ „์ž ์†์ƒ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ „์‚ฌ์ฒด ๊ต๋ž€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋‚ดํ–ฅ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๊ต๋ž€ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ๊ต๋ž€ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ต๋ž€ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ ์œ ์ „์ž์™€ ๊ต๋ž€ ๋‘”๊ฐ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ์ง„ํ™”์ , ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์ , ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ž„์ƒ์  ํŠน์ง•์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ: ๊ต๋ž€ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ ์œ ์ „์ž๋Š” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋ณ€๋ฐฉ์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ์ง„ํ™”์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์กด๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋“ค์€ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์€ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ฏธ์†Œ ์ „์‚ฌ์ฒด์™€ ์ „์‚ฌ์ธ์ž์— ์˜ํ•ด ์กฐ์ ˆ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„ธํฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์‚ฌ์ฒด ๊ต๋ž€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์™ธํ–ฅ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ์ •๋„๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ์น˜์‚ฌ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ต๋ž€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋ง๋‹จ์ด๋ฉด์„œ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์งˆ๋ณ‘ ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ต๋ž€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์ด๋ฉด์„œ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋ง๋‹จ์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, ์งˆ๋ณ‘์„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์—ฐํ•ฉ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋„ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๊ทธ๋ ค๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก : ํšจ๋ชจ์—์„œ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์™€ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ, ๊ต๋ž€ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ ์œ ์ „์ž๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์กด๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ณ  ์„ธํฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์˜ ์ƒ์กด์— ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋‚ดํ–ฅ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ์™ธํ–ฅ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ •๋„์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์œ ์ „์ž ๊ต๋ž€์„ ํ•ด์„ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์งˆ๋ณ‘ ์œ ์ „์ž๋Š” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ๊ต๋ž€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ๋˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ต๋ž€ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์ž„์ƒ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์ „์ฒด ๊ต๋ž€์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.Purpose: Transcriptome is perturbed by millions of genomic variants which could alter function of cells and phenotypes of organisms. As discovered in recent large Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) project, Individual genome has at least 3 to 4 million variants. Here, we applied perturbation network to human data from 1000 genomes project data for interpreting genetic perturbation and characterized perturbation sensitive and tolerant genes. Methods: We integrated SIFT score of non-synonymous variants to calculate gene deleteriousness score and determine whether gene is perturbed or not. Perturbation network was constructed based on gene deleteriousness score and perturbation sensitivity was defined as in-degree of perturbation network. We categorized genes based on perturbation sensitivity and investigated evolutionarily, regulatory, and clinical properties of perturbation sensitive and tolerant genes. Results: Perturbation sensitive genes were in periphery of protein interaction network but evolutionarily conserved. They were regulated by less miRNA and transcription factor and played a key role in cell-cell interaction. Out-degree of perturbation network did not show any significant biological properties. Lethal genes were in periphery of perturbation network and hub of protein interaction network. On the contrary, most disease genes were in hub of perturbation network and showed various trends in protein-interaction network. We drew joint network map and categorized disease by degree of both network. Conclusions: As in yeast perturbation network, perturbation sensitive genes were essential in survival of organism since they were evolutionarily conserved and related to interaction between cells. We confirmed that in-degree of perturbation network is better than out-degree of perturbation network for interpreting genetic perturbation. Disease genes can be categorized and visualized using both protein-interaction network and perturbation network. In conclusion, perturbation sensitivity was valuable measure for interpreting genetic perturbation and assessing gene's biological and clinical properties.1. Introduction 1 1.1. Definition of Genetic Perturbation 1 1.2. Interpretation of genetic perturbation causing variants 2 1.3. Interpretation of genetic perturbation using biological networks 3 1.4. Perturbation Network approach in Yeast 5 1.5. Purpose of study 6 2. Materials and Methods 7 2.1. Genome and transcriptome data from 1000genomes populations. 7 2.2. Calculating gene deleteriousness scores. 8 2.3. Construction of perturbation network. 9 2.4. Construction of Protein Interaction Network. 9 2.5. Retrieving biological information for gene annotation 10 2.6. Excess retention. 10 2.7. Joint network map for visualization of gene sets. 11 2.8. Clinical annotation of PSN 11 3. Results 12 3.1. Building Perturbation network 12 3.2. Biological properties of perturbation network 13 3.2.1. Correlation between perturbation network and PPI network 14 3.2.2. Relationship of perturbation network to Evolutionary feature and regulatory feature 15 3.3. Clinical implication of perturbation network against PPI network 27 3.3.1. Lethal genes versus disease genes 27 3.3.2. Disease gene classification using both Kppi and Kin 31 4. Discussion 35 5. References 38Docto

    Large-scale mapping of human proteinโ€“protein interactions by mass spectrometry

    Get PDF
    Mapping proteinโ€“protein interactions is an invaluable tool for understanding protein function. Here, we report the first large-scale study of proteinโ€“protein interactions in human cells using a mass spectrometry-based approach. The study maps protein interactions for 338 bait proteins that were selected based on known or suspected disease and functional associations. Large-scale immunoprecipitation of Flag-tagged versions of these proteins followed by LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis resulted in the identification of 24 540 potential protein interactions. False positives and redundant hits were filtered out using empirical criteria and a calculated interaction confidence score, producing a data set of 6463 interactions between 2235 distinct proteins. This data set was further cross-validated using previously published and predicted human protein interactions. In-depth mining of the data set shows that it represents a valuable source of novel proteinโ€“protein interactions with relevance to human diseases. In addition, via our preliminary analysis, we report many novel protein interactions and pathway associations

    From Endogenous to Synthetic microRNA-Mediated Regulatory Circuits: An Overview

    Get PDF
    MicroRNAs are short non-coding RNAs that are evolutionarily conserved and are pivotal post-transcriptional mediators of gene regulation. Together with transcription factors and epigenetic regulators, they form a highly interconnected network whose building blocks can be classified depending on the number of molecular species involved and the type of interactions amongst them. Depending on their topology, these molecular circuits may carry out specific functions that years of studies have related to the processing of gene expression noise. In this review, we first present the different over-represented network motifs involving microRNAs and their specific role in implementing relevant biological functions, reviewing both theoretical and experimental studies. We then illustrate the recent advances in synthetic biology, such as the construction of artificially synthesised circuits, which provide a controlled tool to test experimentally the possible microRNA regulatory tasks and constitute a starting point for clinical applications

    DEUBIQUITINATING ENZYMES PROMOTE CANCER PROGRESSION AND METASTASIS VIA REGULATING PROTEIN STABILITY

    Get PDF
    Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs, also called deubiquitinases) are enzymes that remove monoubiquitin or polyubiquitin chains from target proteins. DUBs have critical roles in cell homeostasis and signal transduction, as they regulate protein degradation, subcellular localization, and protein-protein interaction. Deregulation of DUBs contributes substantially to tumor formation and progression, and therefore targeting DUBs may be a promising cancer therapy strategy. My dissertation focuses on identifying the DUBs of EZH2 and SNAI1, two proteins critical for cancer progression and metastasis, and establishing these DUBs as promising anti-cancer targets. EZH2, the catalytic component of the PRC2 complex, silences gene transcription by histone methylation. High levels of EZH2 are a marker of advanced breast cancer and correlate with poor clinical outcomes in many cancers. Although EZH2 enzymatic inhibitors have shown antitumor effects in EZH2-mutated lymphoma and ARID1A-mutated ovarian cancer, many cancers do not respond, because EZH2 can promote cancer independently of its histone methyltransferase activity. Here we identified ZRANB1 (also called Trabid) as an EZH2 deubiquitinase. ZRANB1 binds, deubiquitinates, and stabilizes EZH2. Depletion of ZRANB1 in breast cancer cells results in EZH2 destabilization and growth inhibition. Systemic delivery of ZRANB1 siRNA leads to marked antitumor and antimetastatic effects in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). A small-molecule inhibitor of ZRANB1 destabilizes EZH2 and inhibits the viability of TNBC cells. In breast cancer patients, ZRANB1 levels correlate with EZH2 levels and survival outcomes. These findings suggest the therapeutic potential for targeting the EZH2 deubiquitinase ZRANB1. SNAI1 (also known as Snail or SNAIL1), a major transcription factor inducing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), promotes tumor metastasis and induces resistance to apoptosis and chemotherapy. Here we identified USP37 as a SNAI1 deubiquitinase. USP37 binds, deubiquitinates, and stabilizes SNAI1. Overexpression of the wild-type USP37, but not its catalytically inactive mutant C350S, promotes cancer cell migration. Depletion of USP37 inhibits cancer cell migration, which can be reversed by SNAI1 overexpression. Taken together, USP37 is a SNAI1 deubiquitinase and a potential therapeutic target to inhibit tumor metastasis. In summary, our studies identified the EZH2 deubiquitinase ZRANB1 and the SNAI1 deubiquitinase USP37 as two promising targets to prevent tumor progression and metastasis

    Long Non-Coding RNA (lncRNA) Roles in Cell Biology, Neurodevelopment and Neurological Disorders.

    Get PDF
    Development is a complex process regulated both by genetic and epigenetic and environmental clues. Recently, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as key regulators of gene expression in several tissues including the brain. Altered expression of lncRNAs has been linked to several neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental and mental disorders. The identification and characterization of lncRNAs that are deregulated or mutated in neurodevelopmental and mental health diseases are fundamental to understanding the complex transcriptional processes in brain function. Crucially, lncRNAs can be exploited as a novel target for treating neurological disorders. In our review, we first summarize the recent advances in our understanding of lncRNA functions in the context of cell biology and then discussing their association with selected neuronal development and neurological disorders

    Long non-coding rna (Lncrna) roles in cell biology, neurodevelopment and neurological disorders

    Get PDF
    Development is a complex process regulated both by genetic and epigenetic and environmental clues. Recently, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as key regulators of gene expression in several tissues including the brain. Altered expression of lncRNAs has been linked to several neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental and mental disorders. The identification and characterization of lncRNAs that are deregulated or mutated in neurodevelopmental and mental health diseases are fundamental to understanding the complex transcriptional processes in brain function. Crucially, lncRNAs can be exploited as a novel target for treating neurological disorders. In our review, we first summarize the recent advances in our understanding of lncRNA functions in the context of cell biology and then discussing their association with selected neuronal development and neurological disorders
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore