GCIP: Exploiting the Generation and Optimization of Integration Processes

As a result of the changing scope of data management towards the management of highly distributed systems and applications, integration processes have gained in importance. Such integration processes represent an abstraction of workflow-based integration tasks. In practice, integration processes are pervasive and the performance of complete IT infrastructures strongly depends on the performance of the central integration platform that executes the specified integration processes. In this area, the three major problems are: (1) significant development efforts, (2) low portability, and (3) inefficient execution. To overcome those problems, we follow a model-driven generation approach for integration processes. In this demo proposal, we want to introduce the so-called GCIP Framework (Generation of Complex Integration Processes) which allows the modeling of integration process and the generation of different concrete integration tasks. The model-driven approach opens opportunities for rule-based and workload-based optimization techniques

A survey of dynamic power optimization techniques

One of the most important considerations for the current VLSI/SOC design is power, which can be classified into power analysis and optimization. In this survey, the main concepts of power optimization including the sources and policies are introduced. Among the various approaches, dynamic power management (DPM), which implies to change devices states when they are not working at the highest speed or at their full capacity, is the most efficient one. Our explanations accompanying the figures specify the abstract concepts of DPM. This paper briefly surveys both heuristic and stochastic policies and discusses their advantages and disadvantages

A Three-Level Parallelisation Scheme and Application to the Nelder-Mead Algorithm

We consider a three-level parallelisation scheme. The second and third levels define a classical two-level parallelisation scheme and some load balancing algorithm is used to distribute tasks among processes. It is well-known that for many applications the efficiency of parallel algorithms of the second and third level starts to drop down after some critical parallelisation degree is reached. This weakness of the two-level template is addressed by introduction of one additional parallelisation level. As an alternative to the basic solver some new or modified algorithms are considered on this level. The idea of the proposed methodology is to increase the parallelisation degree by using less efficient algorithms in comparison with the basic solver. As an example we investigate two modified Nelder-Mead methods. For the selected application, a few partial differential equations are solved numerically on the second level, and on the third level the parallel Wang's algorithm is used to solve systems of linear equations with tridiagonal matrices. A greedy workload balancing heuristic is proposed, which is oriented to the case of a large number of available processors. The complexity estimates of the computational tasks are model-based, i.e. they use empirical computational data

Investigation of LSTM Based Prediction for Dynamic Energy Management in Chip Multiprocessors

In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of using long short-term memory (LSTM) instead of Kalman filtering to do prediction for the purpose of constructing dynamic energy management (DEM) algorithms in chip multi-processors (CMPs). Either of the two prediction methods is employed to estimate the workload in the next control period for each of the processor cores. These estimates are then used to select voltage-frequency (VF) pairs for each core of the CMP during the next control period as part of a dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) technique. The objective of the DVFS technique is to reduce energy consumption under performance constraints that are set by the user. We conduct our investigation using a custom Sniper system simulation framework. Simulation results for 16 and 64 core network-on-chip based CMP architectures and using several benchmarks demonstrate that the LSTM is slightly better than Kalman filtering