1,556 research outputs found

    Why On-Chip Cache Coherence is Here to Stay

    Get PDF
    Today’s multicore chips commonly implement shared memory with cache coherence as low-level support for operating systems and application software. Technology trends continue to enable the scaling of the number of (processor) cores per chip. Because conventional wisdom says that the coherence does not scale well to many cores, some prognosticators predict the end of coherence. This paper refutes this conventional wisdom by showing one way to scale on-chip cache coherence with bounded costs by combining known techniques such as: shared caches augmented to track cached copies, explicit cache eviction notifications, and hierarchical design. Based upon our scalability analysis of this proof-of-concept design, we predict that on-chip coherence and the programming convenience and compatibility it provides are here to stay

    Evaluating Cache Coherent Shared Virtual Memory for Heterogeneous Multicore Chips

    Full text link
    The trend in industry is towards heterogeneous multicore processors (HMCs), including chips with CPUs and massively-threaded throughput-oriented processors (MTTOPs) such as GPUs. Although current homogeneous chips tightly couple the cores with cache-coherent shared virtual memory (CCSVM), this is not the communication paradigm used by any current HMC. In this paper, we present a CCSVM design for a CPU/MTTOP chip, as well as an extension of the pthreads programming model, called xthreads, for programming this HMC. Our goal is to evaluate the potential performance benefits of tightly coupling heterogeneous cores with CCSVM

    The locality-aware adaptive cache coherence protocol

    Get PDF
    Next generation multicore applications will process massive amounts of data with significant sharing. Data movement and management impacts memory access latency and consumes power. Therefore, harnessing data locality is of fundamental importance in future processors. We propose a scalable, efficient shared memory cache coherence protocol that enables seamless adaptation between private and logically shared caching of on-chip data at the fine granularity of cache lines. Our data-centric approach relies on in-hardware yet low-overhead runtime profiling of the locality of each cache line and only allows private caching for data blocks with high spatio-temporal locality. This allows us to better exploit the private caches and enable low-latency, low-energy memory access, while retaining the convenience of shared memory. On a set of parallel benchmarks, our low-overhead locality-aware mechanisms reduce the overall energy by 25% and completion time by 15% in an NoC-based multicore with the Reactive-NUCA on-chip cache organization and the ACKwise limited directory-based coherence protocol.United States. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. The Ubiquitous High Performance Computing Progra

    Locality-aware data replication in the Last-Level Cache

    Get PDF
    Next generation multicores will process massive data with varying degree of locality. Harnessing on-chip data locality to optimize the utilization of cache and network resources is of fundamental importance. We propose a locality-aware selective data replication protocol for the last-level cache (LLC). Our goal is to lower memory access latency and energy by replicating only high locality cache lines in the LLC slice of the requesting core, while simultaneously keeping the off-chip miss rate low. Our approach relies on low overhead yet highly accurate in-hardware run-time classification of data locality at the cache line granularity, and only allows replication for cache lines with high reuse. Furthermore, our classifier captures the LLC pressure at the existing replica locations and adapts its replication decision accordingly. The locality tracking mechanism is decoupled from the sharer tracking structures that cause scalability concerns in traditional coherence protocols. Moreover, the complexity of our protocol is low since no additional coherence states are created. On a set of parallel benchmarks, our protocol reduces the overall energy by 16%, 14%, 13% and 21% and the completion time by 4%, 9%, 6% and 13% when compared to the previously proposed Victim Replication, Adaptive Selective Replication, Reactive-NUCA and Static-NUCA LLC management schemes
    corecore