Class in seventeenth-century British drama by women

This dissertation argues that seventeenth-century drama by women should be analyzed as a public discursive practice rather than as privatized closet drama. This study focuses on class in order to delineate the texts\u27 participation in public modes of representation and offers post-marxist readings as an alternative to the gynocritical/biographical model that dominates criticism on literature by women of the early modern period. Chapter one of this dissertation problematizes separate spheres ideology, lest texts by women become separated from the economic sites that inform them. I consider the ideological importance of generic conventions, arguing that conventions of tragedy and comedy are often naturalized into signifiers of female characters\u27 resistance to patriarchal socio-economic conscription. I link the ideas of homology and symbolic capital, both of which serve as a means of articulating the function of class in a study of women\u27s texts. Part one of the dissertation, Class Difference, considers two dramatic texts by aristocratic women: Mary Wroth\u27s Loves Victory in chapter two and Margaret Cavendish\u27s The Lady Contemplation in chapter three. Both texts strategically pit against each other two characters at opposite ends of the social spectrum. This mode of creating privilege---excluding a lower-class other---in turn constitutes a classed position for the author-functions of the texts. Part two, Class Consciousness, considers the flip-side. of the notion of difference by focusing on which classed concerns might produce certain representational choices. Chapter four, which treats Elizabeth Cary\u27s Tragedie of Mariam, considers the material bases of the text\u27s ideological investment in its title character\u27s status as symbolic capital by stressing the discursive saliency in the text of the connections among chastity, class, speech, and publicity. Chapter five extends this mode of reading for class by analyzing four restoration comedies---Fances Boothby\u27s Marcelia , and Aphra Behn\u27s The Rover, Parts I and II and The feign\u27d Curtizans,---each of which notes the role of money in determining a gendered class identity. The availability of both women and money reified as the same circulating object guarantees the (inferior) economic place of the woman within a male economy

The Gathering Twilight? Information Privacy on the Internet in the Post-Enlightenment Era

The steady stream of news reports about violations of privacy on the Internet has spawned a growing body of literature discussing the legal protections available for personally identifiable information—i.e., information about identified or identifiable persons—collected via the Internet. This Article takes the discussion of Internet privacy protection in a new and very different direction by reexamining the U.S. Internet privacy regime from the perspective of a broader cultural/historical analysis and critique. The perspective adopted is that of Alasdair MacIntyre\u27s account of the disarray in Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment discourse about morality and human nature and the accompanying disappearance of rational justifications for decisions and institutions grounded in that discourse. The argument of this Article proceeds in four stages. Section II briefly outlines the transition from the older paradigm to the modern, post-Enlightenment paradigm, drawing heavily on Alasdair MacIntyre\u27s account of the relationships among the individual, the market, and the administrative state. Section III explicates the legal principles of the U.S. Internet privacy regime. Section IV sets those legal principles in a broader context of legal theories concerning the administrative state, drawing in particular on the work of Robert Rabin and other scholars in the field of administrative law. Finally, Section V argues that the U.S. Internet privacy regime reflects and reinforces key tenets of the post-Enlightenment paradigm. In particular, the regime emphasizes protecting the individual who competes in a market and empowering impersonal bureaucratic authority as the guarantor of the individual\u27s privacy

Newman v. Google

3rd amended complain