289 research outputs found

    A Practical Coordinated Trajectory Tracking for A Group of Mixed Wheeled Mobile Robots with Communication Delays

    Get PDF
    Coordination between a specific mobile robot type has been widely investigated, e.g coordination between unicycles. To extend the applicability of the system, a coordinated trajectory tracking of mixed type of mobile robots is considered. We prove that if a certain type of wheeled mobile robot is able to individually track its own reference, then coordination in tracking with other type of robots can be achieved simply by sharing individual tracking errors. Using two types of wheeled mobile robots, namely unicycle type (a nonholonomic mobile robot) and omni wheels type (a holonomic mobile robot), a coordinated control algorithm can achieve a global asymptotically stable condition of the error dynamics of the systems. Under bidirectional communication between robots as a constraint, the group is able to maintain individual tracking while coordinating the movements with other robots regardless occurring perturbations in the system and delays in communication channels. Simulation results suggest that information sharing between the robots increase the robustness in coordinating individual trajectories. Results also show that delays cause drop in performance similar to the case of no information sharing

    ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ์ œ์•ฝํ•˜์—์„œ ์›๊ฒฉ ์ œ์–ด๋˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๋…ผํ™€๋กœ๋…ธ๋ฏน ์ด๋™ํ˜• ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๋Œ€ํ˜• ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์ œ์–ด

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ์ด๋™์ค€.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผํ–‰ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ์ œ์•ฝ ํ•˜์— ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์›๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์–ด๋˜๋Š” ๋…ผํ™€๋กœ๋…ธ๋ฏน ์ด๋™ํ˜• ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๋Œ€ํ˜• ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์ œ์–ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ผ์‹ฑ๊ณผ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ–์ถ”์–ด์ง„ ์˜จ๋ณด๋“œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋กœ๋ด‡๋“ค์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉ, ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์›๊ฒฉ ์ œ์–ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋…ผํ™€๋กœ๋…ธ๋ฏน ํŒจ์‹œ๋ธŒ ๋””์ปดํฌ์ง€์…˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€ํ˜• ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋„๋ก ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€, ๋Œ€ํ˜• ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํฌํ…์…œ ํ•„๋“œ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. n๋Œ€์˜ ๋กœ๋ด‡์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋Œ€ํ˜• ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ† ๋ก ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ์กฐ์„ฑ, 39๋Œ€์˜ ํƒฑํฌ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ์—ฌ 5๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ๊ฐ๊ธฐ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋Œ€ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™˜์„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์ด ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‹ค์ œ ๋กœ๋ด‡ 3๋Œ€๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ํšจ์šฉ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ•„๋‘๋กœ ์ข์€ ๊ธธ๋ชฉ, ๊ฐœํ™œ์ง€ ๋“ฑ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์†์—์„œ์˜ ๊ตฌ๋™์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.We propose a novel framework for formation reconguration of multiple nonholonomic wheeled mobile robots (WMRs) in the changing driving environment. We utilize an onboard system of WMRs with the capability of sensing and computing. Each WMR has the same computing power for visualizing the driving environment, handling the sensing information and calculating the control action. One of the WMRs is the leader with the FPV camera and SLAM, while others with monocular cameras with limited FoV, as the followers, keep a certain desired formation during driving in a distributed manner. We set two control objectives, one is group driving and the other is holding the shape of the formation. We have to capture the control objectives separately and simultaneously, we make the best use of nonholonomic passive decomposition to split the WMRs' kinematics into those of the formation maintaining and group driving. The repulsive potential function to prevent the collision among WMRs and attractive potential function to restrict the boundary of follower WMRs' moving space due to limited FoV range of the monocular cameras while switching their formation are also used. Simulation with 39 tanks and experiments with three WMRs are also performed to verify the proposed framework.Acknowledgements iii List of Figures vii Abbreviations ix 1 Introduction 1 2 Formation Reconguration Control Design 5 2.1 Nonholonomic Passive Decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2 Attractive and Repulsive Potential Function . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3 Control Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.4 Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3 Estimation and Predictive Display 20 3.1 Distributed Pose Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.1.1 EKF Pose Estimation of Leader WMR . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.1.2 EKF Pose Estimation of Follower WMRs . . . . . . . . . 22 3.2 Predictive Display for Distributed WMRs Teleoperation . . . . . 23 4 Experiment 27 4.1 Test Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 4.2 Demonstrate the Proposed Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4.3 Teleoperation Experiment with the Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . 33 5 Conclusion 40Maste

    Analysis and design of controllers for cooperative and automated driving

    Get PDF

    Comprehensive review on controller for leader-follower robotic system

    Get PDF
    985-1007This paper presents a comprehensive review of the leader-follower robotics system. The aim of this paper is to find and elaborate on the current trends in the swarm robotic system, leader-follower, and multi-agent system. Another part of this review will focus on finding the trend of controller utilized by previous researchers in the leader-follower system. The controller that is commonly applied by the researchers is mostly adaptive and non-linear controllers. The paper also explores the subject of study or system used during the research which normally employs multi-robot, multi-agent, space flying, reconfigurable system, multi-legs system or unmanned system. Another aspect of this paper concentrates on the topology employed by the researchers when they conducted simulation or experimental studies

    Trajectory tracking and formation control of a platoon of mobile robots

    Get PDF
    This thesis is concerned with controlling a platoon of wheeled mobile robots (WMR), where the robots are aimed to follow a trajectory while they maintain their formation intact. The control design is carried out by considering unicycle kinematics for each robot, and the leader-follower structure for the formation. It is assumed that every robot except the one located at the end of each platoon can potentially be the leader to the one behind it. It is also assumed that each follower is capable of sensing its relative distance and relative velocity with respect to its preceding robot. The stability of the proposed control law is investigated in the case of perfect sensing and in the presence of input saturation. The impact of measurement noise on the followers is then studied assuming that a known upper bound exists on the measurement error, and a linear matrix inequality (LMI) methodology is proposed to design a control law which minimizes the upper bound on the steady-state error. The problem is then investigated in a more practical setting, where the control input is subject to delay, and that the tracking trajectory can be different in distinct time intervals. It is to be noted that delay often exists in this type of cooperative control system due to data transmission and signal processing, and if neglected in the control design, can lead to poor closed-loop performance or even instability. Furthermore, switching in tracking trajectory can be used as a collision avoidance strategy in the formation control problem. Delay dependent stability conditions are derived in the form of LMIs, and the free-weighting matrix approach is used to obtain less conservative results. Simulations are presented to demonstrate the efficacy of the results obtained in this thesis

    Chatter-Free Distributed Control for Multi-agent Nonholonomic Wheeled Mobile Robot

    Get PDF
    This paper proposes to design a chatter-free distributed control for multiagent nonholonomic wheeled mobile robot systems employing terminal exponential functions with graph theory. The terminal tracking criteria are estimated using the Lyapunov approach. The development of distributed control for nonholonomic multiagent wheeled robot systems is defined in the paper along with consensus tracking for undirected fixed/switched topologies. Numerical simulations have been done in order to assess the efficacy and efficiency of the proposed distributed control method in multiple scenarios

    Lane changing and merging maneuvers of car-like robots

    Get PDF
    This research paper designs a unique motion planner of multiple platoons of nonholonomic car-like robots as a feasible solution to the lane changing/merging maneuvers. The decentralized planner with a leaderless approach and a path-guidance principle derived from the Lyapunov-based control scheme generates collision free avoidance and safe merging maneuvers from multiple lanes to a single lane by deploying a split/merge strategy. The fixed obstacles are the markings and boundaries of the road lanes, while the moving obstacles are the robots themselves. Real and virtual road lane markings and the boundaries of road lanes are incorporated into a workspace to achieve the desired formation and configuration of the robots. Convergence of the robots to goal configurations and the repulsion of the robots from specified obstacles are achieved by suitable attractive and repulsive potential field functions, respectively. The results can be viewed as a significant contribution to the avoidance algorithm of the intelligent vehicle systems (IVS). Computer simulations highlight the effectiveness of the split/merge strategy and the acceleration-based controllers

    Multi-robot Tethering Using Camera

    Get PDF
    An autonomous multi-robot or swarm robot able to perform various cooperative mission such as search and rescue, exploration of unknown or partially known area, transportation, surveillance, defence system, and also firefighting. However, multi-robot application often requires synchronised robotic configuration, reliable communication system and various sensors installed on each robot. This approach has resulted system complexity and very high cost of development

    Formation Control for a Fleet of Autonomous Ground Vehicles: A Survey

    Get PDF
    Autonomous/unmanned driving is the major state-of-the-art step that has a potential to fundamentally transform the mobility of individuals and goods. At present, most of the developments target standalone autonomous vehicles, which can sense the surroundings and control the vehicle based on this perception, with limited or no driver intervention. This paper focuses on the next step in autonomous vehicle research, which is the collaboration between autonomous vehicles, mainly vehicle formation control or vehicle platooning. To gain a deeper understanding in this area, a large number of the existing published papers have been reviewed systemically. In other words, many distributed and decentralized approaches of vehicle formation control are studied and their implementations are discussed. Finally, both technical and implementation challenges for formation control are summarized

    ํƒ€์ด์–ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ž์œจ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์ฃผํ–‰ ์ œ์–ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ์ด๋™์ค€.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” Wheeled Mobile Robot(WMR)์˜์ž์œจ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋น™ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ๋””์ž์ธ ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ์ƒ์šฉ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์ธ CarSim์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ๋กœ, WMR์˜ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน์Šค์™€ ํƒ€์ด์–ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ •์˜ ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ œ์•ฝ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋น™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋น™ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์˜ ์ œ์–ด ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ์ •์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. (์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์š” ๊ฐ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•œ๋‹ค.) ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋น™ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ณ -๋ ˆ๋ฒจ ์ œ์–ด, ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ณ -๊ฒŒ์ธ ์ œ์–ด๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ์ œ์–ดํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์†๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ CarSim ์‹œ๋ฎฌ ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ์˜ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€, ํ—ค์–ดํ•€ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œ ํ•œ๋‹ค.Control design and analysis of Wheeled Mobile Robot(WMR) autonomous drift-driving and the simulation experiment using the CarSim simulator are presented and the analysis of the controller proceeds. We first introduce WMR dynamics, tire model and problem formulation of the WMR. We then design drift-driving control using human strategy (control side slip angle and yaw rate). The drift-driving control consists of high-level control, optimization to find desired control input and high-gain control. We analyze the uncontrolled velocity dynamics and stability of the controller. The CarSim simulation results of drift-driving on steady-state equilibriums and the hairpin path with the desired yaw rate are provided.List of Figures - v List of Tables - vi Abbreviations - vii 1 Introduction - 1 1.1 Motivation and related works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Contribution of this work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 System Modeling - 5 2.1 Model dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2 Tire model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.3 Problemformulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3 Drift-Driving Control Design - 10 3.1 High-level control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2 Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.3 High-gain control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4 Analysis of Control - 17 4.1 Internal dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.2 Stability analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5 Simulation Results - 25 5.1 Simulation setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.2 Steady-state drift-driving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5.3 Hairpin turn drift-driving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 6 Conclusion and Future Work - 40 6.1 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 6.2 Future work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Maste
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore