1,193 research outputs found
Do Multi-Sense Embeddings Improve Natural Language Understanding?
Learning a distinct representation for each sense of an ambiguous word could
lead to more powerful and fine-grained models of vector-space representations.
Yet while `multi-sense' methods have been proposed and tested on artificial
word-similarity tasks, we don't know if they improve real natural language
understanding tasks. In this paper we introduce a multi-sense embedding model
based on Chinese Restaurant Processes that achieves state of the art
performance on matching human word similarity judgments, and propose a
pipelined architecture for incorporating multi-sense embeddings into language
understanding.
We then test the performance of our model on part-of-speech tagging, named
entity recognition, sentiment analysis, semantic relation identification and
semantic relatedness, controlling for embedding dimensionality. We find that
multi-sense embeddings do improve performance on some tasks (part-of-speech
tagging, semantic relation identification, semantic relatedness) but not on
others (named entity recognition, various forms of sentiment analysis). We
discuss how these differences may be caused by the different role of word sense
information in each of the tasks. The results highlight the importance of
testing embedding models in real applications
New Alignment Methods for Discriminative Book Summarization
We consider the unsupervised alignment of the full text of a book with a
human-written summary. This presents challenges not seen in other text
alignment problems, including a disparity in length and, consequent to this, a
violation of the expectation that individual words and phrases should align,
since large passages and chapters can be distilled into a single summary
phrase. We present two new methods, based on hidden Markov models, specifically
targeted to this problem, and demonstrate gains on an extractive book
summarization task. While there is still much room for improvement,
unsupervised alignment holds intrinsic value in offering insight into what
features of a book are deemed worthy of summarization.Comment: This paper reflects work in progres
On Tree-Based Neural Sentence Modeling
Neural networks with tree-based sentence encoders have shown better results
on many downstream tasks. Most of existing tree-based encoders adopt syntactic
parsing trees as the explicit structure prior. To study the effectiveness of
different tree structures, we replace the parsing trees with trivial trees
(i.e., binary balanced tree, left-branching tree and right-branching tree) in
the encoders. Though trivial trees contain no syntactic information, those
encoders get competitive or even better results on all of the ten downstream
tasks we investigated. This surprising result indicates that explicit syntax
guidance may not be the main contributor to the superior performances of
tree-based neural sentence modeling. Further analysis show that tree modeling
gives better results when crucial words are closer to the final representation.
Additional experiments give more clues on how to design an effective tree-based
encoder. Our code is open-source and available at
https://github.com/ExplorerFreda/TreeEnc.Comment: To Appear at EMNLP 201
Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms
Machine learning algorithms frequently require careful tuning of model
hyperparameters, regularization terms, and optimization parameters.
Unfortunately, this tuning is often a "black art" that requires expert
experience, unwritten rules of thumb, or sometimes brute-force search. Much
more appealing is the idea of developing automatic approaches which can
optimize the performance of a given learning algorithm to the task at hand. In
this work, we consider the automatic tuning problem within the framework of
Bayesian optimization, in which a learning algorithm's generalization
performance is modeled as a sample from a Gaussian process (GP). The tractable
posterior distribution induced by the GP leads to efficient use of the
information gathered by previous experiments, enabling optimal choices about
what parameters to try next. Here we show how the effects of the Gaussian
process prior and the associated inference procedure can have a large impact on
the success or failure of Bayesian optimization. We show that thoughtful
choices can lead to results that exceed expert-level performance in tuning
machine learning algorithms. We also describe new algorithms that take into
account the variable cost (duration) of learning experiments and that can
leverage the presence of multiple cores for parallel experimentation. We show
that these proposed algorithms improve on previous automatic procedures and can
reach or surpass human expert-level optimization on a diverse set of
contemporary algorithms including latent Dirichlet allocation, structured SVMs
and convolutional neural networks
- …