9,970 research outputs found
Interlocutors-Related and Hearer-Specific Causes of Misunderstanding: Processing Strategy, Confirmation Bias and Weak Vigilance
Noises, similarities between words, slips of the tongue, ambiguities, wrong or false beliefs, lexical deficits, inappropriate inferences, cognitive overload, non-shared knowledge, topic organisation or focusing problems, among others, may cause misunderstanding. While some of these are structural factors, others pertain to the speaker or to both the speaker and the hearer. In addition to stable factors connected with the interlocutors′ communicative abilities, cultural knowledge or patterns of thinking, other less stable factors, such as their personal relationships, psychological states or actions motivated by physiological functions, may also result in communicative problems. This paper considers a series of further factors that may eventually lead to misunderstanding, and which solely pertain to the hearer: processing strategy, confirmation bias and weak vigilance
User Review-Based Change File Localization for Mobile Applications
In the current mobile app development, novel and emerging DevOps practices
(e.g., Continuous Delivery, Integration, and user feedback analysis) and tools
are becoming more widespread. For instance, the integration of user feedback
(provided in the form of user reviews) in the software release cycle represents
a valuable asset for the maintenance and evolution of mobile apps. To fully
make use of these assets, it is highly desirable for developers to establish
semantic links between the user reviews and the software artefacts to be
changed (e.g., source code and documentation), and thus to localize the
potential files to change for addressing the user feedback. In this paper, we
propose RISING (Review Integration via claSsification, clusterIng, and
linkiNG), an automated approach to support the continuous integration of user
feedback via classification, clustering, and linking of user reviews. RISING
leverages domain-specific constraint information and semi-supervised learning
to group user reviews into multiple fine-grained clusters concerning similar
users' requests. Then, by combining the textual information from both commit
messages and source code, it automatically localizes potential change files to
accommodate the users' requests. Our empirical studies demonstrate that the
proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline work in terms of
clustering and localization accuracy, and thus produces more reliable results.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figures, 8 table
Recommended from our members
A tutorial on cue combination and Signal Detection Theory: Using changes in sensitivity to evaluate how observers integrate sensory information
Many sensory inputs contain multiple sources of information (‘cues’), such as two sounds of different frequencies, or a voice heard in unison with moving lips. Often, each cue provides a separate estimate of the same physical attribute, such as the size or location of an object. An ideal observer can exploit such redundant sensory information to improve the accuracy of their perceptual judgments. For example, if each cue is modeled as an independent, Gaussian, random variable, then combining Ncues should provide up to a √N improvement in detection/discrimination sensitivity. Alternatively, a less efficient observer may base their decision on only a subset of the available information, and so gain little or no benefit from having access to multiple sources of information. Here we use Signal Detection Theory to formulate and compare various models of cue-combination, many of which are commonly used to explain empirical data. We alert the reader to the key assumptions inherent in each model, and provide formulas for deriving quantitative predictions. Code is also provided for simulating each model, allowing expected levels of measurement error to be quantified. Based on these results, it is shown that predicted sensitivity often differs surprisingly little between qualitatively distinct models of combination. This means that sensitivity alone is not sufficient for understanding decision efficiency, and the implications of this are discussed
Distributed Hypothesis Testing with Social Learning and Symmetric Fusion
We study the utility of social learning in a distributed detection model with
agents sharing the same goal: a collective decision that optimizes an agreed
upon criterion. We show that social learning is helpful in some cases but is
provably futile (and thus essentially a distraction) in other cases.
Specifically, we consider Bayesian binary hypothesis testing performed by a
distributed detection and fusion system, where all decision-making agents have
binary votes that carry equal weight. Decision-making agents in the team
sequentially make local decisions based on their own private signals and all
precedent local decisions. It is shown that the optimal decision rule is not
affected by precedent local decisions when all agents observe conditionally
independent and identically distributed private signals. Perfect Bayesian
reasoning will cancel out all effects of social learning. When the agents
observe private signals with different signal-to-noise ratios, social learning
is again futile if the team decision is only approved by unanimity. Otherwise,
social learning can strictly improve the team performance. Furthermore, the
order in which agents make their decisions affects the team decision.Comment: 10 pages, 7 figure
Higher order feature extraction and selection for robust human gesture recognition using CSI of COTS Wi-Fi devices
Device-free human gesture recognition (HGR) using commercial o the shelf (COTS) Wi-Fi
devices has gained attention with recent advances in wireless technology. HGR recognizes the human
activity performed, by capturing the reflections ofWi-Fi signals from moving humans and storing
them as raw channel state information (CSI) traces. Existing work on HGR applies noise reduction
and transformation to pre-process the raw CSI traces. However, these methods fail to capture
the non-Gaussian information in the raw CSI data due to its limitation to deal with linear signal
representation alone. The proposed higher order statistics-based recognition (HOS-Re) model extracts
higher order statistical (HOS) features from raw CSI traces and selects a robust feature subset for the
recognition task. HOS-Re addresses the limitations in the existing methods, by extracting third order
cumulant features that maximizes the recognition accuracy. Subsequently, feature selection methods
derived from information theory construct a robust and highly informative feature subset, fed as
input to the multilevel support vector machine (SVM) classifier in order to measure the performance.
The proposed methodology is validated using a public database SignFi, consisting of 276 gestures
with 8280 gesture instances, out of which 5520 are from the laboratory and 2760 from the home
environment using a 10 5 cross-validation. HOS-Re achieved an average recognition accuracy of
97.84%, 98.26% and 96.34% for the lab, home and lab + home environment respectively. The average
recognition accuracy for 150 sign gestures with 7500 instances, collected from five di erent users was
96.23% in the laboratory environment.Taylor's University through its TAYLOR'S PhD SCHOLARSHIP Programmeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Beliefs and expertise in sequential decision making
This work explores a sequential decision making problem with agents having diverse expertise and mismatched beliefs. We consider an N-agent sequential binary hypothesis test in which each agent sequentially makes a decision
based not only on a private observation, but also on previous agents’ decisions. In addition, the agents have their own beliefs instead of the true prior, and have varying expertise in terms of the noise variance in the private signal. We focus on the risk of the last-acting agent, where precedent agents are selfish. Thus, we call this advisor(s)-advisee sequential decision making. We first derive the optimal decision rule by recursive belief update and conclude, counterintuitively, that beliefs deviating from the true prior could be optimal in this setting. The impact of diverse noise levels (which means diverse expertise levels) in the two-agent case is also considered and the analytical properties of the optimal belief curves are given. These curves, for certain cases, resemble probability weighting functions from cumulative prospect theory, and so we also discuss the choice of Prelec weighting functions as an approximation for the optimal beliefs, and
the possible psychophysical optimality of human beliefs. Next, we consider an advisor selection problem where in the advisee of a certain belief chooses an advisor from a set of candidates with varying beliefs. We characterize the decision region for choosing such an advisor and argue that an advisee with beliefs varying from the true prior often ends up selecting a suboptimal advisor, indicating the need for a social planner. We close with a discussion on the implications of the study toward designing artificial intelligence systems for augmenting human intelligence.https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04419First author draf
- …