158,585 research outputs found

    Welcome Message from the Co-Editors-in-Chief

    Get PDF
    Welcome Message from the Co-Editors-in-Chie

    Columbia Chronicle (02/01/2021)

    Get PDF
    Student newspaper from February 1, 2021 entitled The Columbia Chronicle. This issue is 13 pages. Cover story: Welcome Back . Editors-in-Chief: Mari Devereaux & Kendall Polidori.https://digitalcommons.colum.edu/cadc_chronicle/2093/thumbnail.jp

    Hadron

    Get PDF
    Hello, and welcome to the very first issue of Hadron! The Hadron team consists of 11 hardworking students from the sophomore, junior, and senior class at the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy. The students work to give you content on the current happenings at IMSA and summaries of topical articles in math, physics, technology, biology, and chemistry. From interviewing to writing, our ultimate vision is to recreate the same excitement that we have for math and science in our readers. Happy reading, and make sure to stay in tune for our next issue. Feel free to contact us with questions, comments, and concerns at [email protected] Sincerely from the Editors-in-Chief, Devika Prasad, Caitlyn Castillohttps://digitalcommons.imsa.edu/hadron_magazine/1000/thumbnail.jp

    Form & Reform: The Economic Realities of the United States Healthcare System

    Get PDF
    Good afternoon, everybody. My name is Eric Steiger, I\u27m one of the editors-in-chief from the Journal of Law and Health. And I\u27m happy to welcome all of you to the second speaker event in the 2009/2010 Journal of Law and Health Speaker Series. Thank you all for coming. Now, I know that the news last week was dominated by the story of Sandra Bullock\u27s breakup; however, some of you might have noticed that a small piece of minor legislation also got passed through Congress last week. And you also might have noticed that it wasn\u27t quite as full of bipartisan support as it otherwise might have been. And so, the real question: Could it have been? What would such legislation have looked like? And what\u27s the real difference between that and what we have now? And in order to help us answer that question, we have Professor Mark Vortuba from Case Western Reserve\u27s Weatherhead School of Management with us. Professor Vortuba has written on the allocation of medical resources, incentives for care, insurance markets, the effects of plant closings on communities, parental job loss and the link between divorced non-resident fathers\u27 proximity and children\u27s long-run outcomes. He has a P.h.D from Princeton University, and we\u27re proud to have him here today. Everybody please give a warm welcome to Professor Mark Vortuba

    Foreword: Reflections on our Founding

    Get PDF
    Law Journals have been under heavy criticism for as long as we can remember. The criticisms come from all quarters, including judges, law professors, and even commentators at large. In an address at the Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference almost a decade ago, for example, Chief Justice Roberts complained about the “disconnect between the academy and the profession.” More pointedly, he continued, “[p]ick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar.” Similarly, law professors have developed what Lawrence Friedman calls “a literature of invective” against law reviews. Adam Liptak summarized one line of criticism with a question: “[W]hy are law reviews, the primary repositories of legal scholarship, edited by law students?

    Foreword: Reflections on our Founding

    Get PDF
    Law Journals have been under heavy criticism for as long as we can remember. The criticisms come from all quarters, including judges, law professors, and even commentators at large. In an address at the Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference almost a decade ago, for example, Chief Justice Roberts complained about the “disconnect between the academy and the profession.” More pointedly, he continued, “[p]ick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar.” Similarly, law professors have developed what Lawrence Friedman calls “a literature of invective” against law reviews. Adam Liptak summarized one line of criticism with a question: “[W]hy are law reviews, the primary repositories of legal scholarship, edited by law students?

    Leaning Forward While Looking Back

    Get PDF
    • …
    corecore