Upper bounds for domination related parameters in graphs on surfaces

AbstractIn this paper we give tight upper bounds on the total domination number, the weakly connected domination number and the connected domination number of a graph in terms of order and Euler characteristic. We also present upper bounds for the restrained bondage number, the total restrained bondage number and the restricted edge connectivity of graphs in terms of the orientable/nonorientable genus and maximum degree

Bounds relating the weakly connected domination number to the total domination number and the matching number

AbstractLet G=(V,E) be a connected graph. A dominating set S of G is a weakly connected dominating set of G if the subgraph (V,E∩(S×V)) of G with vertex set V that consists of all edges of G incident with at least one vertex of S is connected. The minimum cardinality of a weakly connected dominating set of G is the weakly connected domination number, denoted γwc(G). A set S of vertices in G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number γt(G) of G. In this paper, we show that 12(γt(G)+1)≤γwc(G)≤32γt(G)−1. Properties of connected graphs that achieve equality in these bounds are presented. We characterize bipartite graphs as well as the family of graphs of large girth that achieve equality in the lower bound, and we characterize the trees achieving equality in the upper bound. The number of edges in a maximum matching of G is called the matching number of G, denoted α′(G). We also establish that γwc(G)≤α′(G), and show that γwc(T)=α′(T) for every tree T

Dichotomy for tree-structured trigraph list homomorphism problems

Trigraph list homomorphism problems (also known as list matrix partition problems) have generated recent interest, partly because there are concrete problems that are not known to be polynomial time solvable or NP-complete. Thus while digraph list homomorphism problems enjoy dichotomy (each problem is NP-complete or polynomial time solvable), such dichotomy is not necessarily expected for trigraph list homomorphism problems. However, in this paper, we identify a large class of trigraphs for which list homomorphism problems do exhibit a dichotomy. They consist of trigraphs with a tree-like structure, and, in particular, include all trigraphs whose underlying graphs are trees. In fact, we show that for these tree-like trigraphs, the trigraph list homomorphism problem is polynomially equivalent to a related digraph list homomorphism problem. We also describe a few examples illustrating that our conditions defining tree-like trigraphs are not unnatural, as relaxing them may lead to harder problems