3,152 research outputs found
Vote and aggregation in combinatorial domains with structured preferences
In many real-world collective decision problems, the set of alternatives is a Cartesian product of finite value domains for each of a given set of variables. The prohibitive size of such combinatorial domains makes it practically impossible to represent preference relations explicitly. Now, the AI community has been developing languages for representing preferences on such domains in a succinct way, exploiting structural properties such as conditional preferential independence. In this paper we reconsider voting and aggregation rules in the case where voters' preferences have a common preferential independence structure, and address the issue of decomposing a voting rule or an aggregation function following a linear order over variables
Aggregating Dependency Graphs into Voting Agendas in Multi-Issue Elections
Many collective decision making problems have a
combinatorial structure: the agents involved must
decide on multiple issues and their preferences over
one issue may depend on the choices adopted for
some of the others. Voting is an attractive method
for making collective decisions, but conducting a
multi-issue election is challenging. On the one hand,
requiring agents to vote by expressing their preferences
over all combinations of issues is computationally
infeasible; on the other, decomposing the
problem into several elections on smaller sets of
issues can lead to paradoxical outcomes. Any pragmatic
method for running a multi-issue election will
have to balance these two concerns. We identify
and analyse the problem of generating an agenda
for a given election, specifying which issues to vote
on together in local elections and in which order to
schedule those local elections
An Efficient Protocol for Negotiation over Combinatorial Domains with Incomplete Information
We study the problem of agent-based negotiation in combinatorial domains. It
is difficult to reach optimal agreements in bilateral or multi-lateral
negotiations when the agents' preferences for the possible alternatives are not
common knowledge. Self-interested agents often end up negotiating inefficient
agreements in such situations. In this paper, we present a protocol for
negotiation in combinatorial domains which can lead rational agents to reach
optimal agreements under incomplete information setting. Our proposed protocol
enables the negotiating agents to identify efficient solutions using
distributed search that visits only a small subspace of the whole outcome
space. Moreover, the proposed protocol is sufficiently general that it is
applicable to most preference representation models in combinatorial domains.
We also present results of experiments that demonstrate the feasibility and
computational efficiency of our approach
- …