Development of robots and application to industrial processes

An algorithm is presented for using a robot system with a single camera to position in three-dimensional space a slender object for insertion into a hole; for example, an electrical pin-type termination into a connector hole. The algorithm relies on a control-configured end effector to achieve the required horizontal translations and rotational motion, and it does not require camera calibration. A force sensor in each fingertip is integrated with the vision system to allow the robot to teach itself new reference points when different connectors and pins are used. Variability in the grasped orientation and position of the pin can be accomodated with the sensor system. Performance tests show that the system is feasible. More work is needed to determine more precisely the effects of lighting levels and lighting direction

Visual and Kinematic Coordinated Control of Mobile Manipulating Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Manipulating objects using arms mounted to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is attractive because UAVs may access many locations that are otherwise inaccessible to traditional mobile manipulation platforms such as ground vehicles. Historically, UAVs have been employed in ways that avoid interaction with the environment at all costs. The recent trend of increasing small UAV lift capacity and the reduction of the weight of manipulator components make the realization of mobile manipulating UAVs imminent. Despite recent work, several major challenges remain to be overcome before it will be common practice to manipulate objects from UAVs. Among these challenges, the constantly moving UAV platform and compliance of manipulator arms make it difficult to position the UAV and end-effector relative to an object of interest precisely enough for reliable manipulation. Solving this challenge will bring UAVs one step closer to being able to perform meaningful tasks such as infrastructure repair, disaster response, law enforcement, and personal assistance. Toward a solution to this challenge, this thesis describes a way forward that uses the UAV as a means to crudely position a manipulator within reach of the end-effector's goal position in the world. The manipulator then performs the fine positioning of the end-effector, rejecting position perturbations caused by UAV motions. An algorithm to coordinate the redundant degrees of freedom of an aerial manipulation system is described that allows the motions of the manipulator to serve as inputs to the UAV's position controller. To demonstrate this algorithm, the manipulator's six degrees of freedom are servoed using visual sensing to drive an eye-in-hand camera to a specified pose relative to a target while treating motions of the host platform as perturbations. Simultaneously, the host platform's degrees of freedom are regulated using kinematic information from the manipulator. This ultimately drives the UAV to a position that allows the manipulator to assume a pose relative to the UAV that maximizes reachability, thus facilitating the arm's ability to compensate for undesired UAV motions. Maintaining this loose kinematic coupling between the redundant degrees of freedom of the host UAV and manipulator allows this type of controller to be applied to a wide variety of platforms, including manned aircraft, rather than a single instance of a purpose-built system. As a result of this loose coupling, careful consideration must be given to the manipulator design so that it can achieve useful poses while minimally influencing the stability of the host UAV. Accordingly, the novel application of a parallel manipulator mechanism is described.Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering -- Drexel University, 201

Proceedings of the NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics, volume 2

These proceedings contain papers presented at the NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics held in Pasadena, January 31 to February 2, 1989. The theme of the Conference was man-machine collaboration in space. The Conference provided a forum for researchers and engineers to exchange ideas on the research and development required for application of telerobotics technology to the space systems planned for the 1990s and beyond. The Conference: (1) provided a view of current NASA telerobotic research and development; (2) stimulated technical exchange on man-machine systems, manipulator control, machine sensing, machine intelligence, concurrent computation, and system architectures; and (3) identified important unsolved problems of current interest which can be dealt with by future research

Conference on Intelligent Robotics in Field, Factory, Service, and Space (CIRFFSS 1994), volume 1

The AIAA/NASA Conference on Intelligent Robotics in Field, Factory, Service, and Space (CIRFFSS '94) was originally proposed because of the strong belief that America's problems of global economic competitiveness and job creation and preservation can partly be solved by the use of intelligent robotics, which are also required for human space exploration missions. Individual sessions addressed nuclear industry, agile manufacturing, security/building monitoring, on-orbit applications, vision and sensing technologies, situated control and low-level control, robotic systems architecture, environmental restoration and waste management, robotic remanufacturing, and healthcare applications

Proceedings of the NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics, volume 3

The theme of the Conference was man-machine collaboration in space. The Conference provided a forum for researchers and engineers to exchange ideas on the research and development required for application of telerobotics technology to the space systems planned for the 1990s and beyond. The Conference: (1) provided a view of current NASA telerobotic research and development; (2) stimulated technical exchange on man-machine systems, manipulator control, machine sensing, machine intelligence, concurrent computation, and system architectures; and (3) identified important unsolved problems of current interest which can be dealt with by future research

Fourth Annual Workshop on Space Operations Applications and Research (SOAR 90)

The proceedings of the SOAR workshop are presented. The technical areas included are as follows: Automation and Robotics; Environmental Interactions; Human Factors; Intelligent Systems; and Life Sciences. NASA and Air Force programmatic overviews and panel sessions were also held in each technical area

Proceedings of the NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics, volume 4

Papers presented at the NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics are compiled. The theme of the conference was man-machine collaboration in space. The conference provided a forum for researchers and engineers to exchange ideas on the research and development required for the application of telerobotic technology to the space systems planned for the 1990's and beyond. Volume 4 contains papers related to the following subject areas: manipulator control; telemanipulation; flight experiments (systems and simulators); sensor-based planning; robot kinematics, dynamics, and control; robot task planning and assembly; and research activities at the NASA Langley Research Center

The Sixth Annual Workshop on Space Operations Applications and Research (SOAR 1992)

This document contains papers presented at the Space Operations, Applications, and Research Symposium (SOAR) hosted by the U.S. Air Force (USAF) on 4-6 Aug. 1992 and held at the JSC Gilruth Recreation Center. The symposium was cosponsored by the Air Force Material Command and by NASA/JSC. Key technical areas covered during the symposium were robotic and telepresence, automation and intelligent systems, human factors, life sciences, and space maintenance and servicing. The SOAR differed from most other conferences in that it was concerned with Government-sponsored research and development relevant to aerospace operations. The symposium's proceedings include papers covering various disciplines presented by experts from NASA, the USAF, universities, and industry

Learning in behavioural robotics

The research described in this thesis examines how machine learning mechanisms can be used in an assembly robot system to improve the reliability of the system and reduce the development workload, without reducing the flexibility of the system. The justification foi' this is that for a robot to be performing effectively it is frequently necessary to have gained experience of its performance under a particular configuration before that configuration can be altered to produce a performance improvement. Machine learning mechanisms can automate this activity of testing, evaluating and then changing.From studying how other researchers have developed working robot systems the activities which require most effort and experimentation are:-• The selection of the optimal parameter settings. • The establishment of the action-sensor couplings which are necessary for the effective handling of uncertainty. • Choosing which way to achieve a goal.One way to implement the first two kinds of learning is to specify a model of the coupling or the interaction of parameters and results, and from that model derive an appropriate learning mechanism that will find a parametrisation for that model that will enable good performance to be obtained. From this starting point it has been possible to show how equal, or better performance can be obtained by using iearning mechanisms which are neither derived from nor require a model of the task being learned. Instead, by combining iteration and a task specific profit function it is possible to use a generic behavioural module based on a learning mechanism to achieve the task.Iteration and a task specific profit function can also be used to learn which behavioural module from a pool of equally competent modules is the best at any one time to use to achieve a particular goal. Like the other two kinds of learning, this successfully automates an otherwise difficult test and evaluation process that would have to be performed by a developer. In doing so effectively, it, like the other learning that has been used here, shows that instead of being a peripheral issue to be introduced to a working system, learning, carried out in the right way, can be instrumental in the production of that working system