10,670 research outputs found
Enhancing Predicate Pairing with Abstraction for Relational Verification
Relational verification is a technique that aims at proving properties that
relate two different program fragments, or two different program runs. It has
been shown that constrained Horn clauses (CHCs) can effectively be used for
relational verification by applying a CHC transformation, called predicate
pairing, which allows the CHC solver to infer relations among arguments of
different predicates. In this paper we study how the effects of the predicate
pairing transformation can be enhanced by using various abstract domains based
on linear arithmetic (i.e., the domain of convex polyhedra and some of its
subdomains) during the transformation. After presenting an algorithm for
predicate pairing with abstraction, we report on the experiments we have
performed on over a hundred relational verification problems by using various
abstract domains. The experiments have been performed by using the VeriMAP
transformation and verification system, together with the Parma Polyhedra
Library (PPL) and the Z3 solver for CHCs.Comment: Pre-proceedings paper presented at the 27th International Symposium
on Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation (LOPSTR 2017), Namur,
Belgium, 10-12 October 2017 (arXiv:1708.07854
Proving Correctness of Imperative Programs by Linearizing Constrained Horn Clauses
We present a method for verifying the correctness of imperative programs
which is based on the automated transformation of their specifications. Given a
program prog, we consider a partial correctness specification of the form
prog , where the assertions and are
predicates defined by a set Spec of possibly recursive Horn clauses with linear
arithmetic (LA) constraints in their premise (also called constrained Horn
clauses). The verification method consists in constructing a set PC of
constrained Horn clauses whose satisfiability implies that prog
is valid. We highlight some limitations of state-of-the-art
constrained Horn clause solving methods, here called LA-solving methods, which
prove the satisfiability of the clauses by looking for linear arithmetic
interpretations of the predicates. In particular, we prove that there exist
some specifications that cannot be proved valid by any of those LA-solving
methods. These specifications require the proof of satisfiability of a set PC
of constrained Horn clauses that contain nonlinear clauses (that is, clauses
with more than one atom in their premise). Then, we present a transformation,
called linearization, that converts PC into a set of linear clauses (that is,
clauses with at most one atom in their premise). We show that several
specifications that could not be proved valid by LA-solving methods, can be
proved valid after linearization. We also present a strategy for performing
linearization in an automatic way and we report on some experimental results
obtained by using a preliminary implementation of our method.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP),
Proceedings of ICLP 201
Proving theorems by program transformation
In this paper we present an overview of the unfold/fold proof method, a method for proving theorems about programs, based on program transformation. As a metalanguage for specifying programs and program properties we adopt constraint logic programming (CLP), and we present a set of transformation rules (including the familiar unfolding and folding rules) which preserve the semantics of CLP programs. Then, we show how program transformation strategies can be used, similarly to theorem proving tactics, for guiding the application of the transformation rules and inferring the properties to be proved. We work out three examples: (i) the proof of predicate equivalences, applied to the verification of equality between CCS processes, (ii) the proof of first order formulas via an extension of the quantifier elimination method, and (iii) the proof of temporal properties of infinite state concurrent systems, by using a transformation strategy that performs program specialization
Verification of Imperative Programs by Constraint Logic Program Transformation
We present a method for verifying partial correctness properties of
imperative programs that manipulate integers and arrays by using techniques
based on the transformation of constraint logic programs (CLP). We use CLP as a
metalanguage for representing imperative programs, their executions, and their
properties. First, we encode the correctness of an imperative program, say
prog, as the negation of a predicate 'incorrect' defined by a CLP program T. By
construction, 'incorrect' holds in the least model of T if and only if the
execution of prog from an initial configuration eventually halts in an error
configuration. Then, we apply to program T a sequence of transformations that
preserve its least model semantics. These transformations are based on
well-known transformation rules, such as unfolding and folding, guided by
suitable transformation strategies, such as specialization and generalization.
The objective of the transformations is to derive a new CLP program TransfT
where the predicate 'incorrect' is defined either by (i) the fact 'incorrect.'
(and in this case prog is not correct), or by (ii) the empty set of clauses
(and in this case prog is correct). In the case where we derive a CLP program
such that neither (i) nor (ii) holds, we iterate the transformation. Since the
problem is undecidable, this process may not terminate. We show through
examples that our method can be applied in a rather systematic way, and is
amenable to automation by transferring to the field of program verification
many techniques developed in the field of program transformation.Comment: In Proceedings Festschrift for Dave Schmidt, arXiv:1309.455
Towards Energy Consumption Verification via Static Analysis
In this paper we leverage an existing general framework for resource usage
verification and specialize it for verifying energy consumption specifications
of embedded programs. Such specifications can include both lower and upper
bounds on energy usage, and they can express intervals within which energy
usage is to be certified to be within such bounds. The bounds of the intervals
can be given in general as functions on input data sizes. Our verification
system can prove whether such energy usage specifications are met or not. It
can also infer the particular conditions under which the specifications hold.
To this end, these conditions are also expressed as intervals of functions of
input data sizes, such that a given specification can be proved for some
intervals but disproved for others. The specifications themselves can also
include preconditions expressing intervals for input data sizes. We report on a
prototype implementation of our approach within the CiaoPP system for the XC
language and XS1-L architecture, and illustrate with an example how embedded
software developers can use this tool, and in particular for determining values
for program parameters that ensure meeting a given energy budget while
minimizing the loss in quality of service.Comment: Presented at HIP3ES, 2015 (arXiv: 1501.03064
Experiments with a Convex Polyhedral Analysis Tool for Logic Programs
Convex polyhedral abstractions of logic programs have been found very useful
in deriving numeric relationships between program arguments in order to prove
program properties and in other areas such as termination and complexity
analysis. We present a tool for constructing polyhedral analyses of
(constraint) logic programs. The aim of the tool is to make available, with a
convenient interface, state-of-the-art techniques for polyhedral analysis such
as delayed widening, narrowing, "widening up-to", and enhanced automatic
selection of widening points. The tool is accessible on the web, permits user
programs to be uploaded and analysed, and is integrated with related program
transformations such as size abstractions and query-answer transformation. We
then report some experiments using the tool, showing how it can be conveniently
used to analyse transition systems arising from models of embedded systems, and
an emulator for a PIC microcontroller which is used for example in wearable
computing systems. We discuss issues including scalability, tradeoffs of
precision and computation time, and other program transformations that can
enhance the results of analysis.Comment: Paper presented at the 17th Workshop on Logic-based Methods in
Programming Environments (WLPE2007
Verification of Java Bytecode using Analysis and Transformation of Logic Programs
State of the art analyzers in the Logic Programming (LP) paradigm are
nowadays mature and sophisticated. They allow inferring a wide variety of
global properties including termination, bounds on resource consumption, etc.
The aim of this work is to automatically transfer the power of such analysis
tools for LP to the analysis and verification of Java bytecode (JVML). In order
to achieve our goal, we rely on well-known techniques for meta-programming and
program specialization. More precisely, we propose to partially evaluate a JVML
interpreter implemented in LP together with (an LP representation of) a JVML
program and then analyze the residual program. Interestingly, at least for the
examples we have studied, our approach produces very simple LP representations
of the original JVML programs. This can be seen as a decompilation from JVML to
high-level LP source. By reasoning about such residual programs, we can
automatically prove in the CiaoPP system some non-trivial properties of JVML
programs such as termination, run-time error freeness and infer bounds on its
resource consumption. We are not aware of any other system which is able to
verify such advanced properties of Java bytecode
- …