59 research outputs found

    A Hierarchy of Maps Between Compacta

    Get PDF
    Let CH be the class of compacta (i.e., compact Hausdorff spaces), with BS the subclass of Boolean spaces. For each ordinal α and pair ⟨K,L⟩\langle K,L\rangle of subclasses of CH, we define Lev≥α K,L), the class of maps of level at least α from spaces in K to spaces in L, in such a way that, for finite α, Lev≥α (BS,BS) consists of the Stone duals of Boolean lattice embeddings that preserve all prenex first-order formulas of quantifier rank α. Maps of level ≥ 0 are just the continuous surjections, and the maps of level ≥ 1 are the co-existential maps introduced in [8]. Co-elementary maps are of level ≥α for all ordinals α; of course in the Boolean context, the co-elementary maps coincide with the maps of level ≥ω. The results of this paper include: (i) every map of level ≥ω is co-elementary; (ii) the limit maps of an ω-indexed inverse system of maps of level ≥α are also of level ≥α; and (iii) if K is a co-elementary class, k \u3c ω and Lev≥ k(K,K) = Lev≥ k+1 (K,K), then Lev≥ k(K,K) = Lev≥ω(K,K). A space X ∈ K is co-existentially closed in K if Lev≥ 0(K, X) = Lev≥ 1 (K, X). Adapting the technique of adding roots, by which one builds algebraically closed extensions of fields (and, more generally, existentially closed extensions of models of universal-existential theories), we showed in [8] that every infinite member of a co-inductive co-elementary class (such as CH itself, BS, or the class CON of continua) is a continuous image of a space of the same weight that is co-existentially closed in that class. We show here that every compactum that is co-existentially closed in CON (a co-existentially closed continuum) is both indecomposable and of covering dimension on

    Axiomatisability problems for S-posets

    Full text link
    Let C be a class of algebras of a given fixed type t. Associated with the type is a first order language L_t. One can then ask the question, when is the class C axiomatisable by sentences of L_t. In this paper we will be considering axiomatisability problems for classes of left S-posets over a pomonoid S (that is, a monoid S equipped with a partial order compatible with the binary operation). We aim to determine the pomonoids S such that certain categorically defined classes are axiomatisable. The classes we consider are the free S-posets, the projective S-posets and classes arising from flatness properties. Some of these cases have been studied in a recent article by Pervukhin and Stepanova. We present some general strategies to determine axiomatisability, from which their results for the classes of weakly po-flat and po-flat S-posets will follow. We also consider a number of classes not previously examined

    Structures, homomorphisms, and the needs of model theory

    Get PDF
    When we look closely at textbooks on model theory, we find that there are three different accounts of what a model or structure is. One of these is highly language dependent, so that the same structure cannot be the interpretation of two different languages or signatures. The other two definitions do not fall foul of that dependence but all textbooks tie the notion of homomorphism so closely to language (signature) that only structures interpreting the same language (signature) are isomorphic. Although this follows the practice in universal algebra, it is highly unnatural. The aim here is to present a notion of homomorphism better consonant with intuition and with what the less cautious authors of textbooks say when they speak informally
    • …
    corecore