34,710 research outputs found

    First order algorithms in variational image processing

    Get PDF
    Variational methods in imaging are nowadays developing towards a quite universal and flexible tool, allowing for highly successful approaches on tasks like denoising, deblurring, inpainting, segmentation, super-resolution, disparity, and optical flow estimation. The overall structure of such approaches is of the form D(Ku)+αR(u)minu{\cal D}(Ku) + \alpha {\cal R} (u) \rightarrow \min_u ; where the functional D{\cal D} is a data fidelity term also depending on some input data ff and measuring the deviation of KuKu from such and R{\cal R} is a regularization functional. Moreover KK is a (often linear) forward operator modeling the dependence of data on an underlying image, and α\alpha is a positive regularization parameter. While D{\cal D} is often smooth and (strictly) convex, the current practice almost exclusively uses nonsmooth regularization functionals. The majority of successful techniques is using nonsmooth and convex functionals like the total variation and generalizations thereof or 1\ell_1-norms of coefficients arising from scalar products with some frame system. The efficient solution of such variational problems in imaging demands for appropriate algorithms. Taking into account the specific structure as a sum of two very different terms to be minimized, splitting algorithms are a quite canonical choice. Consequently this field has revived the interest in techniques like operator splittings or augmented Lagrangians. Here we shall provide an overview of methods currently developed and recent results as well as some computational studies providing a comparison of different methods and also illustrating their success in applications.Comment: 60 pages, 33 figure

    Seismic Tomography Using Variational Inference Methods

    Get PDF
    Seismic tomography is a methodology to image the interior of solid or fluid media, and is often used to map properties in the subsurface of the Earth. In order to better interpret the resulting images it is important to assess imaging uncertainties. Since tomography is significantly nonlinear, Monte Carlo sampling methods are often used for this purpose, but they are generally computationally intractable for large datasets and high-dimensional parameter spaces. To extend uncertainty analysis to larger systems we use variational inference methods to conduct seismic tomography. In contrast to Monte Carlo sampling, variational methods solve the Bayesian inference problem as an optimization problem, yet still provide probabilistic results. In this study, we applied two variational methods, automatic differential variational inference (ADVI) and Stein variational gradient descent (SVGD), to 2D seismic tomography problems using both synthetic and real data and we compare the results to those from two different Monte Carlo sampling methods. The results show that variational inference methods can produce accurate approximations to the results of Monte Carlo sampling methods at significantly lower computational cost, provided that gradients of parameters with respect to data can be calculated efficiently. We expect that the methods can be applied fruitfully to many other types of geophysical inverse problems.Comment: 26 pages, 14 figure

    Variational semi-blind sparse deconvolution with orthogonal kernel bases and its application to MRFM

    Get PDF
    We present a variational Bayesian method of joint image reconstruction and point spread function (PSF) estimation when the PSF of the imaging device is only partially known. To solve this semi-blind deconvolution problem, prior distributions are specified for the PSF and the 3D image. Joint image reconstruction and PSF estimation is then performed within a Bayesian framework, using a variational algorithm to estimate the posterior distribution. The image prior distribution imposes an explicit atomic measure that corresponds to image sparsity. Importantly, the proposed Bayesian deconvolution algorithm does not require hand tuning. Simulation results clearly demonstrate that the semi-blind deconvolution algorithm compares favorably with previous Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) version of myopic sparse reconstruction. It significantly outperforms mismatched non-blind algorithms that rely on the assumption of the perfect knowledge of the PSF. The algorithm is illustrated on real data from magnetic resonance force microscopy (MRFM)

    Variational semi-blind sparse deconvolution with orthogonal kernel bases and its application to MRFM

    Get PDF
    We present a variational Bayesian method of joint image reconstruction and point spread function (PSF) estimation when the PSF of the imaging device is only partially known. To solve this semi-blind deconvolution problem, prior distributions are specified for the PSF and the 3D image. Joint image reconstruction and PSF estimation is then performed within a Bayesian framework, using a variational algorithm to estimate the posterior distribution. The image prior distribution imposes an explicit atomic measure that corresponds to image sparsity. Importantly, the proposed Bayesian deconvolution algorithm does not require hand tuning. Simulation results clearly demonstrate that the semi-blind deconvolution algorithm compares favorably with previous Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) version of myopic sparse reconstruction. It significantly outperforms mismatched non-blind algorithms that rely on the assumption of the perfect knowledge of the PSF. The algorithm is illustrated on real data from magnetic resonance force microscopy (MRFM)
    corecore