Avantages et inconvénients de la formation médicale continue virtuelle : une étude de la portée

Introduction: With the COVID-19 pandemic, most continuing medical education activities became virtual (VCME). The authors conducted a scoping review to synthesize the advantages and disadvantages of VCME to establish the impact of this approach on inequities that physicians face along the intersections of gender, race, and location of practice. Methods: Guided by the methodological framework of Arksey and O’Malley, the search included six databases and was limited to studies published between January 1991 to April 2021. Eligible studies included those related to accredited/non-accredited post-certification medical education, conferences, or meetings in a virtual setting focused on physicians. Numeric and inductive thematic analyses were performed.   Results: 282 studies were included in the review. Salient advantages identified were convenience, favourable learning formats, collaboration opportunities, effectiveness at improving knowledge and clinical practices, and cost-effectiveness. Prominent disadvantages included technological barriers, poor design, cost, lack of sufficient technological skill, and time. Analysis of the studies showed that VCME was most common in the general/family practice specialty, in suburban settings, and held by countries in the Global North. A minority of studies reported on gender (35%) and race (4%).  Discussion: Most studies report advantages of VCME, but disadvantages and barriers exist that are contextual to the location of practice and medical subspecialty. VCME events are largely organized by Global North countries with suboptimized accessibility for Global South attendees. A lack of reported data on gender and race reveals a limited understanding of how VCME affects vulnerable populations, prompting potential future considerations as it evolves. Introduction : Par suite de la pandémie de la COVID-19, la plupart des activités de formation médicale continue ont été offertes en ligne. Les auteurs ont effectué une revue de la portée visant à synthétiser les avantages et les inconvénients de la formation médicale continue en mode virtuel (FMCV) et à examiner les effets de cette approche sur les inégalités qui affectent les médecins en fonction du sexe, de la race et du lieu d’exercice. Méthodes : Suivant le cadre méthodologique d’Arksey et O’Malley, nous avons effectué une recherche dans six banques de données, que nous avons limitée aux études publiées entre janvier 1991 et avril 2021. Les études incluses étaient celles relatives à la formation médicale post-certification, accréditée ou non, aux conférences et aux réunions destinées aux médecins qui se sont déroulées dans un cadre virtuel. Une analyse numérique et une analyse thématique inductive ont été réalisées. Résultats : Au total, 282 articles ont été inclus dans l’étude. Les principaux avantages identifiés sont la commodité, les formats favorables à l’apprentissage, les possibilités de collaboration, l’efficacité pour l’amélioration des connaissances et des pratiques cliniques et le rapport coût-efficacité. Les principaux inconvénients sont les obstacles technologiques, les défauts de conception, le coût, les compétences technologiques insuffisantes et le manque de temps. L’analyse des études a montré que la FMCV était la plus courante dans la spécialité de la médecine générale/familiale, dans les banlieues et dans les pays du Nord. Quelques études considèrent les facteurs sexe (35 %) et race (4 %). Discussion : La plupart des études évoquent les avantages de la FMCV, mais il existe des inconvénients et des obstacles liés au lieu d’exercice et à la sous-spécialité médicale. La plupart des activités de FMCV sont organisées dans les pays du Nord et leur accessibilité n’est pas optimale pour les participants provenant des pays du Sud. Le manque de données sur le sexe et la race pose une limite à notre compréhension de la façon dont la FMCV affecte les populations vulnérables. Ces facteurs seraient à prendre en considération dans les recherches futures sur le sujet et au fur et à mesure que la FMCV évolue.

Evaluation of technology-enhanced learning programs for health care professionals: systematic review

Background: Technology-enhanced learning (TEL) programs are increasingly seen as the way in which education for health care professionals can be transformed, giving access to effective ongoing learning and training even where time or geographical barriers exist. Given the increasing emphasis on this mode of educational support for health care practitioners, it is vital that we can effectively evaluate and measure impact to ensure that TEL programs are effective and fit for purpose. This paper examines the current evidence base for the first time, in relation to the evaluation of TEL programs for health care professionals. Objective: We conducted a systematic review of the current literature relating to the evaluation of TEL programs for health care professionals and critically appraised the quality of the studies. Methods: This review employed specific search criteria to identify research studies that included evaluation of TEL for health care professionals. The databases searched included Medline Ovid, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus Advanced, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, ZETOC, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Explore Digital Library, Allied and Complementary Medicine, and Education Resources Information Center between January 2006 and January 2017. An additional hand search for relevant articles from reference lists was undertaken. Each of the studies identified was critically appraised for quality using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. This approach produced a percentage total score for each study across specified categories. A proportion of the studies were independently assessed by an additional two reviewers. Results: The review identified 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The studies included scored totals across eight categories within a range of 37%-95% and an average score of 68%. Studies that measured TEL using learner satisfaction surveys, or combined pretest and posttest knowledge score testing with learner satisfaction surveys, were found to be the most common types of TEL evaluations evident in the literature. The studies reviewed had low scores across reporting on ethical matters, design, and data collection categories. Conclusions: There continues to be a need to develop effective and standard TEL evaluation tools, and good quality studies that describe effective evaluation of TEL education for health care professionals. Studies often fail to provide sufficient detail to support transferability or direct future TEL health care education programs

Recent Trends in U.S. Services Trade: 2009 Annual Report

Recent Trends in U.S. Services Trade, 2009 Annual Report focuses principally on professional services (advertising, education, healthcare, and legal services), which provide critical inputs to various goods and service industries, as well as specialized services directly to individual consumers. The largest professional service firms in terms of revenue are located in developed countries and offer their services across the globe through both cross-border trade and affiliate transactions. The markets of many developing countries are growing rapidly and offer larger professional service firms significant merger, acquisition, and investment opportunities. U.S. services overall, and professional services in particular, grew faster in 2007 in terms of contribution to gross domestic product, employment, and cross-border exports than the average annual rate of the preceding five-year period. Services supplied to foreign consumers by foreign-based affiliates of U.S. firms, including those in professional services, also experienced recent strong growth