Pricing options and computing implied volatilities using neural networks

This paper proposes a data-driven approach, by means of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN), to value financial options and to calculate implied volatilities with the aim of accelerating the corresponding numerical methods. With ANNs being universal function approximators, this method trains an optimized ANN on a data set generated by a sophisticated financial model, and runs the trained ANN as an agent of the original solver in a fast and efficient way. We test this approach on three different types of solvers, including the analytic solution for the Black-Scholes equation, the COS method for the Heston stochastic volatility model and Brent's iterative root-finding method for the calculation of implied volatilities. The numerical results show that the ANN solver can reduce the computing time significantly

BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernels

A major challenge in Bayesian Optimization is the boundary issue (Swersky, 2017) where an algorithm spends too many evaluations near the boundary of its search space. In this paper, we propose BOCK, Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernels, whose basic idea is to transform the ball geometry of the search space using a cylindrical transformation. Because of the transformed geometry, the Gaussian Process-based surrogate model spends less budget searching near the boundary, while concentrating its efforts relatively more near the center of the search region, where we expect the solution to be located. We evaluate BOCK extensively, showing that it is not only more accurate and efficient, but it also scales successfully to problems with a dimensionality as high as 500. We show that the better accuracy and scalability of BOCK even allows optimizing modestly sized neural network layers, as well as neural network hyperparameters.Comment: 10 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables, 1 algorith

Understanding Model-Based Reinforcement Learning and its Application in Safe Reinforcement Learning

Model-based reinforcement learning algorithms have been shown to achieve successful results on various continuous control benchmarks, but the understanding of model-based methods is limited. We try to interpret how model-based method works through novel experiments on state-of-the-art algorithms with an emphasis on the model learning part. We evaluate the role of the model learning in policy optimization and propose methods to learn a more accurate model. With a better understanding of model-based reinforcement learning, we then apply model-based methods to solve safe reinforcement learning (RL) problems with near-zero violation of hard constraints throughout training. Drawing an analogy with how humans and animals learn to perform safe actions, we break down the safe RL problem into three stages. First, we train agents in a constraint-free environment to learn a performant policy for reaching high rewards, and simultaneously learn a model of the dynamics. Second, we use model-based methods to plan safe actions and train a safeguarding policy from these actions through imitation. Finally, we propose a factored framework to train an overall policy that mixes the performant policy and the safeguarding policy. This three-step curriculum ensures near-zero violation of safety constraints at all times. As an advantage of model-based method, the sample complexity required at the second and third steps of the process is significantly lower than model-free methods and can enable online safe learning. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods in various continuous control problems and analyze the advantages over state-of-the-art approaches