Xqx Based Modeling For General Integer Programming Problems

We present a new way to model general integer programming (IP) problems with in- equality and equality constraints using XQX. We begin with the definition of IP problems folloby their practical applications, and then present the existing XQX based models to handle such problems. We then present our XQX model for general IP problems (including binary IP) with equality and inequality constraints, and also show how this model can be applied to problems with just inequality constraints. We then present the local optima based solution procedure for our XQX model. We also present new theorems and their proofs for our XQX model. Next, we present a detailed literature survey on the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem (MDKP) and apply our XQX model using our simple heuristic procedure to solve benchmark problems. The 0-1 MDKP is a binary IP problem with inequality con- straints and variables with binary values. We apply our XQX model using a heuristics we developed on 0-1 MDKP problems of various sizes and found that our model can handle any problem sizes and can provide reasonable quality results in reasonable time. Finally, we apply our XQX model developed for general integer programming problems on the general multi-dimensional knapsack problems. The general MDKP is a general IP problem with inequality constraints where the variables are positive integers. We apply our XQX model on GMDKP problems of various sizes and find that it can provide reasonable quality results in reasonable time. We also find that it can handle problems of any size and provide fea- sible and good quality solutions irrespective of the starting solutions. We conclude with a discussion of some issues related with our XQX model

Exact and heuristic approaches for multi-component optimisation problems

Modern real world applications are commonly complex, consisting of multiple subsystems that may interact with or depend on each other. Our case-study about wave energy converters (WEC) for the renewable energy industry shows that in such a multi-component system, optimising each individual component cannot yield global optimality for the entire system, owing to the influence of their interactions or the dependence on one another. Moreover, modelling a multi-component problem is rarely easy due to the complexity of the issues, which leads to a desire for existent models on which to base, and against which to test, calculations. Recently, the travelling thief problem (TTP) has attracted significant attention in the Evolutionary Computation community. It is intended to offer a better model for multicomponent systems, where researchers can push forward their understanding of the optimisation of such systems, especially for understanding of the interconnections between the components. The TTP interconnects with two classic NP-hard problems, namely the travelling salesman problem and the 0-1 knapsack problem, via the transportation cost that non-linearly depends on the accumulated weight of items. This non-linear setting introduces additional complexity. We study this nonlinearity through a simplified version of the TTP - the packing while travelling (PWT) problem, which aims to maximise the total reward for a given travelling tour. Our theoretical and experimental investigations demonstrate that the difficulty of a given problem instance is significantly influenced by adjusting a single parameter, the renting rate, which prompted our method of creating relatively hard instances using simple evolutionary algorithms. Our further investigations into the PWT problem yield a dynamic programming (DP) approach that can solve the problem in pseudo polynomial time and a corresponding approximation scheme. The experimental investigations show that the new approaches outperform the state-of-the-art ones. We furthermore propose three exact algorithms for the TTP, based on the DP of the PWT problem. By employing the exact DP for the underlying PWT problem as a subroutine, we create a novel indicator-based hybrid evolutionary approach for a new bi-criteria formulation of the TTP. This hybrid design takes advantage of the DP approach, along with a number of novel indicators and selection mechanisms to achieve better solutions. The results of computational experiments show that the approach is capable to outperform the state-of-the-art results.Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science, 201

Constructing dynamic test environments for genetic algorithms based on problem difficulty

This article is posted here with permission from IEEE - Copyright @ 2004 IEEEIn recent years the study of dynamic optimization problems has attracted an increasing interest from the community of genetic algorithms and researchers have developed a variety of approaches into genetic algorithms to solve these problems. In order to compare their performance, an important issue is the construction of standardized dynamic test environments. Based on the concept of problem difficulty, This work proposes a new dynamic environment generator using a decomposable trap function. With this generator, it is possible to systematically construct dynamic environments with changing and bounding difficulty and hence, we can test different genetic algorithms under dynamic environments with changing but controllable difficulty levels.This research was supported by UK EPSRC under Grant GR/S79718/01

Reoptimization in lagrangian methods for the quadratic knapsack problem

International audienceThe 0-1 quadratic knapsack problem consists in maximizing a quadratic objective function subject to a linear capacity constraint. To solve exactly large instances of this problem with a tree search algorithm (e.g. a branch and bound method), the knowledge of good lower and upper bounds is crucial for pruning the tree but also for fixing as many variables as possible in a preprocessing phase. The upper bounds used in the best known exact approaches are based on Lagrangian relaxation and decomposition. It appears that the computation of these Lagrangian dual bounds involves the resolution of numerous 0-1 linear knapsack subproblems. Thus, taking this huge number of solvings into account, we propose to embed reoptimization techniques for improving the efficiency of the preprocessing phase of the 0-1 quadratic knapsack resolution. Namely, reoptimization is introduced to accelerate each independent sequence of 0-1 linear knapsack problems induced by the Lagrangian relaxation as well as the Lagrangian decomposition. Numerous numerical experiments validate the relevance of our approach

Integrated machine learning and optimization approaches

This dissertation focuses on the integration of machine learning and optimization. Specifically, novel machine learning-based frameworks are proposed to help solve a broad range of well-known operations research problems to reduce the solution times. The first study presents a bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory framework to learn optimal solutions to sequential decision-making problems. Computational results show that the framework significantly reduces the solution time of benchmark capacitated lot-sizing problems without much loss in feasibility and optimality. Also, models trained using shorter planning horizons can successfully predict the optimal solution of the instances with longer planning horizons. For the hardest data set, the predictions at the 25% level reduce the solution time of 70 CPU hours to less than 2 CPU minutes with an optimality gap of 0.8% and without infeasibility. In the second study, an extendable prediction-optimization framework is presented for multi-stage decision-making problems to address the key issues of sequential dependence, infeasibility, and generalization. Specifically, an attention-based encoder-decoder neural network architecture is integrated with an infeasibility-elimination and generalization framework to learn high-quality feasible solutions. The proposed framework is demonstrated to tackle the two well-known dynamic NP-Hard optimization problems: multi-item capacitated lot-sizing and multi-dimensional knapsack. The results show that models trained on shorter and smaller-dimension instances can be successfully used to predict longer and larger-dimension problems with the presented item-wise expansion algorithm. The solution time can be reduced by three orders of magnitude with an average optimality gap below 0.1%. The proposed framework can be advantageous for solving dynamic mixed-integer programming problems that need to be solved instantly and repetitively. In the third study, a deep reinforcement learning-based framework is presented for solving scenario-based two-stage stochastic programming problems, which are computationally challenging to solve. A general two-stage deep reinforcement learning framework is proposed where two learning agents sequentially learn to solve each stage of a general two-stage stochastic multi-dimensional knapsack problem. The results show that solution time can be reduced significantly with a relatively small gap. Additionally, decision-making agents can be trained with a few scenarios and solve problems with a large number of scenarios. In the fourth study, a learning-based prediction-optimization framework is proposed for solving scenario-based multi-stage stochastic programs. The issue of non-anticipativity is addressed with a novel neural network architecture that is based on a neural machine translation system. Furthermore, training the models on deterministic problems is suggested instead of solving hard and time-consuming stochastic programs. In this framework, the level of variables used for the solution is iteratively reduced to eliminate infeasibility, and a heuristic based on a linear relaxation is performed to reduce the solution time. An improved item-wise expansion strategy is introduced to generalize the algorithm to tackle instances with different sizes. The results are presented in solving stochastic multi-item capacitated lot-sizing and stochastic multi-stage multi-dimensional knapsack problems. The results show that the solution time can be reduced by a factor of 599 with an optimality gap of only 0.08%. Moreover, results demonstrate that the models can be used to predict similarly structured stochastic programming problems with a varying number of periods, items, and scenarios. The frameworks presented in this dissertation can be utilized to achieve high-quality and fast solutions to repeatedly-solved problems in various industrial and business settings, such as production and inventory management, capacity planning, scheduling, airline logistics, dynamic pricing, and emergency management

Proceedings of the XIII Global Optimization Workshop: GOW'16

[Excerpt] Preface: Past Global Optimization Workshop shave been held in Sopron (1985 and 1990), Szeged (WGO, 1995), Florence (GO’99, 1999), Hanmer Springs (Let’s GO, 2001), Santorini (Frontiers in GO, 2003), San José (Go’05, 2005), Mykonos (AGO’07, 2007), Skukuza (SAGO’08, 2008), Toulouse (TOGO’10, 2010), Natal (NAGO’12, 2012) and Málaga (MAGO’14, 2014) with the aim of stimulating discussion between senior and junior researchers on the topic of Global Optimization. In 2016, the XIII Global Optimization Workshop (GOW’16) takes place in Braga and is organized by three researchers from the University of Minho. Two of them belong to the Systems Engineering and Operational Research Group from the Algoritmi Research Centre and the other to the Statistics, Applied Probability and Operational Research Group from the Centre of Mathematics. The event received more than 50 submissions from 15 countries from Europe, South America and North America. We want to express our gratitude to the invited speaker Panos Pardalos for accepting the invitation and sharing his expertise, helping us to meet the workshop objectives. GOW’16 would not have been possible without the valuable contribution from the authors and the International Scientific Committee members. We thank you all. This proceedings book intends to present an overview of the topics that will be addressed in the workshop with the goal of contributing to interesting and fruitful discussions between the authors and participants. After the event, high quality papers can be submitted to a special issue of the Journal of Global Optimization dedicated to the workshop. [...

Matheuristics: using mathematics for heuristic design

Matheuristics are heuristic algorithms based on mathematical tools such as the ones provided by mathematical programming, that are structurally general enough to be applied to different problems with little adaptations to their abstract structure. The result can be metaheuristic hybrids having components derived from the mathematical model of the problems of interest, but the mathematical techniques themselves can define general heuristic solution frameworks. In this paper, we focus our attention on mathematical programming and its contributions to developing effective heuristics. We briefly describe the mathematical tools available and then some matheuristic approaches, reporting some representative examples from the literature. We also take the opportunity to provide some ideas for possible future development

Knapsack Problems with Side Constraints

The thesis considers a specific class of resource allocation problems in Combinatorial Optimization: the Knapsack Problems. These are paradigmatic NP-hard problems where a set of items with given profits and weights is available. The aim is to select a subset of the items in order to maximize the total profit without exceeding a known knapsack capacity. In the classical 0-1 Knapsack Problem (KP), each item can be picked at most once. The focus of the thesis is on four generalizations of KP involving side constraints beyond the capacity bound. More precisely, we provide solution approaches and insights for the following problems: The Knapsack Problem with Setups; the Collapsing Knapsack Problem; the Penalized Knapsack Problem; the Incremental Knapsack Problem. These problems reveal challenging research topics with many real-life applications. The scientific contributions we provide are both from a theoretical and a practical perspective. On the one hand, we give insights into structural elements and properties of the problems and derive a series of approximation results for some of them. On the other hand, we offer valuable solution approaches for direct applications of practical interest or when the problems considered arise as sub-problems in broader contexts