2,421 research outputs found
On Ladder Logic Bombs in Industrial Control Systems
In industrial control systems, devices such as Programmable Logic Controllers
(PLCs) are commonly used to directly interact with sensors and actuators, and
perform local automatic control. PLCs run software on two different layers: a)
firmware (i.e. the OS) and b) control logic (processing sensor readings to
determine control actions). In this work, we discuss ladder logic bombs, i.e.
malware written in ladder logic (or one of the other IEC 61131-3-compatible
languages). Such malware would be inserted by an attacker into existing control
logic on a PLC, and either persistently change the behavior, or wait for
specific trigger signals to activate malicious behaviour. For example, the LLB
could replace legitimate sensor readings with manipulated values. We see the
concept of LLBs as a generalization of attacks such as the Stuxnet attack. We
introduce LLBs on an abstract level, and then demonstrate several designs based
on real PLC devices in our lab. In particular, we also focus on stealthy LLBs,
i.e. LLBs that are hard to detect by human operators manually validating the
program running in PLCs. In addition to introducing vulnerabilities on the
logic layer, we also discuss countermeasures and we propose two detection
techniques.Comment: 11 pages, 14 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorith
Unsupervised Anomaly-based Malware Detection using Hardware Features
Recent works have shown promise in using microarchitectural execution
patterns to detect malware programs. These detectors belong to a class of
detectors known as signature-based detectors as they catch malware by comparing
a program's execution pattern (signature) to execution patterns of known
malware programs. In this work, we propose a new class of detectors -
anomaly-based hardware malware detectors - that do not require signatures for
malware detection, and thus can catch a wider range of malware including
potentially novel ones. We use unsupervised machine learning to build profiles
of normal program execution based on data from performance counters, and use
these profiles to detect significant deviations in program behavior that occur
as a result of malware exploitation. We show that real-world exploitation of
popular programs such as IE and Adobe PDF Reader on a Windows/x86 platform can
be detected with nearly perfect certainty. We also examine the limits and
challenges in implementing this approach in face of a sophisticated adversary
attempting to evade anomaly-based detection. The proposed detector is
complementary to previously proposed signature-based detectors and can be used
together to improve security.Comment: 1 page, Latex; added description for feature selection in Section 4,
results unchange
Fortifying Applications Against Xpath Injection Attacks
Code injection derives from a software vulnerability that allows a malicious user to inject custom code into the server engine. In recent years, there have been a great number of such exploits targeting web applications. In this paper we propose an approach that prevents a specific kind of code injection attacks known as xpath injection in a novel way. To detect an attack, our scheme uses location-specific identifiers to validate the executable xpath code. These identifiers represent all the unique fragments of this code along with their call sites within the application
Recommended from our members
On the Infeasibility of Modeling Polymorphic Shellcode
Polymorphic malcode remains a troubling threat. The ability formal code to automatically transform into semantically equivalent variants frustrates attempts to rapidly construct a single, simple, easily verifiable representation. We present a quantitative analysis of the strengths and limitations of shellcode polymorphism and consider its impact on current intrusion detection practice. We focus on the nature of shellcode decoding routines. The empirical evidence we gather helps show that modeling the class of self-modifying code is likely intractable by known methods, including both statistical constructs and string signatures. In addition, we develop and present measures that provide insight into the capabilities, strengths, and weaknesses of polymorphic engines. In order to explore countermeasures to future polymorphic threats, we show how to improve polymorphic techniques and create a proof-of-concept engine expressing these improvements. Our results indicate that the class of polymorphic behavior is too greatly spread and varied to model effectively. Our analysis also supplies a novel way to understand the limitations of current signature-based techniques. We conclude that modeling normal content is ultimately a more promising defense mechanism than modeling malicious or abnormal content
Recommended from our members
Randomized Instruction Sets and Runtime Environments: Past Research and Future Directions
Instruction set randomization offers a way to combat code-injection attacks by separating code from data (specifically, by randomizing legitimate code's execution environment). The author describes the motivation behind this approach and two application environments
- …