13 research outputs found

    Selection and Evaluation of a Silver Nanoparticle Imaging Agent for Dual-Energy Mammography

    Get PDF
    Over the past decade, contrast-enhanced (CE) dual-energy (DE) x-ray breast imaging has emerged as an exciting, new modality to provide high quality anatomic and functional information of the breast. The combination of these data in a single imaging procedure represents a powerful tool for the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. The most widely used implementation of CEDE imaging is k-edge imaging, whereby two x-ray spectra are placed on either side of the k-edge of the contrast material. Currently, CEDE imaging is performed with iodinated contrast agents. The lower energies used in clinical DE breast imaging systems compared to imaging systems for other organs suggest that an alternative material may be better suited. We developed an analytical model to compare the contrast of various elements in the periodic table. The model predicts that materials with atomic numbers from 42 to 52 should provide the best contrast in DE breast imaging while still providing high-quality anatomical images. Upon consideration, silver was chosen for more detailed study. Through simulation and experimental validation, we determined that not only does silver perform better than iodine when imaged at their respective optimal conditions, but silver is able to provide higher levels of contrast than iodine when imaged with current protocols that are optimal for iodine. Therefore, a silver agent could be translated to the clinic without modification of existing imaging systems or techniques. A prototype silver agent was designed. The agent consists of (i) a silver core for DE contrast, (ii) a silica shell to prevent the release of toxic silver cations, and (iii) a polyethylene glycol layer to improve the biocompatibility of the entire nanostructure. DE imaging with the particles showed a 9-fold increase in contrast when injected into mice, while displaying no acutely toxic effects. The prototype silica-silver nanoparticles represent a first step in developing a biologically stable contrast agent that is specifically suited for DE breast imaging

    Predicting Task-­specific Performance for Iterative Reconstruction in Computed Tomography

    Get PDF
    <p>The cross-sectional images of computed tomography (CT) are calculated from a series of projections using reconstruction methods. Recently introduced on clinical CT scanners, iterative reconstruction (IR) method enables potential patient dose reduction with significantly reduced image noise, but is limited by its "waxy" texture and nonlinear nature. To balance the advantages and disadvantages of IR, evaluations are needed with diagnostic accuracy as the endpoint. Moreover, evaluations need to take into consideration the type of the imaging task (detection and quantification), the properties of the task (lesion size, contrast, edge profile, etc.), and other acquisition and reconstruction parameters. </p><p>To evaluate detection tasks, the more acceptable method is observer studies, which involve image preparation, graphical user interface setup, manual detection and scoring, and statistical analyses. Because such evaluation can be time consuming, mathematical models have been proposed to efficiently predict observer performance in terms of a detectability index (d'). However, certain assumptions such as system linearity may need to be made, thus limiting the application of the models to potentially nonlinear IR. For evaluating quantification tasks, conventional method can also be time consuming as it usually involves experiments with anthropomorphic phantoms. A mathematical model similar to d' was therefore proposed for the prediction of volume quantification performance, named the estimability index (e'). However, this prior model was limited in its modeling of the task, modeling of the volume segmentation process, and assumption of system linearity.</p><p>To expand prior d' and e' models to the evaluations of IR performance, the first part of this dissertation developed an experimental methodology to characterize image noise and resolution in a manner that was relevant to nonlinear IR. Results showed that this method was efficient and meaningful in characterizing the system performance accounting for the non-linearity of IR at multiple contrast and noise levels. It was also shown that when certain criteria were met, the measurement error could be controlled to be less than 10% to allow challenging measuring conditions with low object contrast and high image noise.</p><p>The second part of this dissertation incorporated the noise and resolution characterizations developed in the first part into the d' calculations, and evaluated the performance of IR and conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) for detection tasks. Results showed that compared to FBP, IR required less dose to achieve a threshold performance accuracy level, therefore potentially reducing the required dose. The dose saving potential of IR was not constant, but dependent on the task properties, with subtle tasks (small size and low contrast) enabling more dose saving than conspicuous tasks. Results also showed that at a fixed dose level, IR allowed more subtle tasks to exceed a threshold performance level, demonstrating the overall superior performance of IR for detection tasks.</p><p>The third part of this dissertation evaluated IR performance in volume quantification tasks with conventional experimental method. The volume quantification performance of IR was measured using an anthropomorphic chest phantom and compared to FBP in terms of accuracy and precision. Results showed that across a wide range of dose and slice thickness, IR led to accuracy significantly different from that of FBP, highlighting the importance of calibrating or expanding current segmentation software to incorporate the image characteristics of IR. Results also showed that despite IR's great noise reduction in uniform regions, IR in general had quantification precision similar to that of FBP, possibly due to IR's diminished noise reduction at edges (such as nodule boundaries) and IR's loss of resolution at low dose levels. </p><p>The last part of this dissertation mathematically predicted IR performance in volume quantification tasks with an e' model that was extended in three respects, including the task modeling, the segmentation software modeling, and the characterizations of noise and resolution properties. Results showed that the extended e' model correlated with experimental precision across a range of image acquisition protocols, nodule sizes, and segmentation software. In addition, compared to experimental assessments of quantification performance, e' was significantly reduced in computational time, such that it can be easily employed in clinical studies to verify quantitative compliance and to optimize clinical protocols for CT volumetry.</p><p>The research in this dissertation has two important clinical implications. First, because d' values reflect the percent of detection accuracy and e' values reflect the quantification precision, this work provides a framework for evaluating IR with diagnostic accuracy as the endpoint. Second, because the calculations of d' and e' models are much more efficient compared to conventional observer studies, the clinical protocols with IR can be optimized in a timely fashion, and the compliance of clinical performance can be examined routinely.</p>Dissertatio

    Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: Advanced Models of Imaging Physics and Prior Information

    Get PDF
    Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) represents a rapidly developing imaging modality that provides three-dimensional (3D) volumetric images with sub-millimeter spatial resolution and soft-tissue visibility from a single gantry rotation. CBCT tends to have small footprint, mechanical simplicity, open geometry, and low cost compared to conventional diagnostic CT. Because of these features, CBCT has been used in a variety of specialty diagnostic applications, image-guided radiation therapy (on-board CBCT), and surgical guidance (e.g., C-arm based CBCT). However, the current generation of CBCT systems face major challenges in low-contrast, soft-tissue image quality – for example, in the detection of acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), which requires a fairly high level of image uniformity, spatial resolution, and contrast resolution. Moreover, conventional approaches in both diagnostic and image-guided interventions that involve a series of imaging studies fail to leverage the wealth of patient-specific anatomical information available from previous scans. Leveraging the knowledge gained from prior images holds the potential for major gains in image quality and dose reduction. Model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) attempts to make more efficient use of the measurement data by incorporating a forward model of physical detection processes. Moreover, MBIR allows incorporation of various forms of prior information into image reconstruction, ranging from image smoothness and sharpness to patient-specific anatomical information. By leveraging such advantages, MBIR has demonstrated improved tradeoffs between image quality and radiation dose in multi-detector CT in the past decade and has recently shown similar promise in CBCT. However, the full potential of MBIR in CBCT is yet to be realized. This dissertation explores the capabilities of MBIR in improving image quality (especially low-contrast, soft-tissue image quality) and reducing radiation dose in CBCT. The presented work encompasses new MBIR methods that: i) modify the noise model in MBIR to compensate for noise amplification from artifact correction; ii) design regularization by explicitly incorporating task-based imaging performance as the objective; iii) mitigate truncation effects in a computationally efficient manner; iv) leverage a wealth of patient-specific anatomical information from a previously acquired image; and v) prospectively estimate the optimal amount of prior image information for accurate admission of specific anatomical changes. Specific clinical challenges are investigated in the detection of acute ICH and surveillance of lung nodules. The results show that MBIR can substantially improve low-contrast, soft-tissue image quality in CBCT and enable dose reduction techniques in sequential imaging studies. The thesis demonstrates that novel MBIR methods hold strong potential to overcome conventional barriers to CBCT image quality and open new clinical applications that would benefit from high-quality 3D imaging

    Infective/inflammatory disorders

    Get PDF

    The radiological investigation of musculoskeletal tumours : chairperson's introduction

    No full text

    Information Fusion of Magnetic Resonance Images and Mammographic Scans for Improved Diagnostic Management of Breast Cancer

    Get PDF
    Medical imaging is critical to non-invasive diagnosis and treatment of a wide spectrum of medical conditions. However, different modalities of medical imaging employ/apply di erent contrast mechanisms and, consequently, provide different depictions of bodily anatomy. As a result, there is a frequent problem where the same pathology can be detected by one type of medical imaging while being missed by others. This problem brings forward the importance of the development of image processing tools for integrating the information provided by different imaging modalities via the process of information fusion. One particularly important example of clinical application of such tools is in the diagnostic management of breast cancer, which is a prevailing cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Currently, the diagnosis of breast cancer relies mainly on X-ray mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which are both important throughout different stages of detection, localization, and treatment of the disease. The sensitivity of mammography, however, is known to be limited in the case of relatively dense breasts, while contrast enhanced MRI tends to yield frequent 'false alarms' due to its high sensitivity. Given this situation, it is critical to find reliable ways of fusing the mammography and MRI scans in order to improve the sensitivity of the former while boosting the specificity of the latter. Unfortunately, fusing the above types of medical images is known to be a difficult computational problem. Indeed, while MRI scans are usually volumetric (i.e., 3-D), digital mammograms are always planar (2-D). Moreover, mammograms are invariably acquired under the force of compression paddles, thus making the breast anatomy undergo sizeable deformations. In the case of MRI, on the other hand, the breast is rarely constrained and imaged in a pendulous state. Finally, X-ray mammography and MRI exploit two completely di erent physical mechanisms, which produce distinct diagnostic contrasts which are related in a non-trivial way. Under such conditions, the success of information fusion depends on one's ability to establish spatial correspondences between mammograms and their related MRI volumes in a cross-modal cross-dimensional (CMCD) setting in the presence of spatial deformations (+SD). Solving the problem of information fusion in the CMCD+SD setting is a very challenging analytical/computational problem, still in need of efficient solutions. In the literature, there is a lack of a generic and consistent solution to the problem of fusing mammograms and breast MRIs and using their complementary information. Most of the existing MRI to mammogram registration techniques are based on a biomechanical approach which builds a speci c model for each patient to simulate the effect of mammographic compression. The biomechanical model is not optimal as it ignores the common characteristics of breast deformation across different cases. Breast deformation is essentially the planarization of a 3-D volume between two paddles, which is common in all patients. Regardless of the size, shape, or internal con guration of the breast tissue, one can predict the major part of the deformation only by considering the geometry of the breast tissue. In contrast with complex standard methods relying on patient-speci c biomechanical modeling, we developed a new and relatively simple approach to estimate the deformation and nd the correspondences. We consider the total deformation to consist of two components: a large-magnitude global deformation due to mammographic compression and a residual deformation of relatively smaller amplitude. We propose a much simpler way of predicting the global deformation which compares favorably to FEM in terms of its accuracy. The residual deformation, on the other hand, is recovered in a variational framework using an elastic transformation model. The proposed algorithm provides us with a computational pipeline that takes breast MRIs and mammograms as inputs and returns the spatial transformation which establishes the correspondences between them. This spatial transformation can be applied in different applications, e.g., producing 'MRI-enhanced' mammograms (which is capable of improving the quality of surgical care) and correlating between different types of mammograms. We investigate the performance of our proposed pipeline on the application of enhancing mammograms by means of MRIs and we have shown improvements over the state of the art
    corecore