CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN ROMANIA

The purpose of this paper is to identify the main opportunities and limitations of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The survey was defined with the aim to involve the highest possible number of relevant CSR topics and give the issue a more wholesome perspective. It provides a basis for further comprehension and deeper analyses of specific CSR areas. The conditions determining the success of CSR in Romania have been defined in the paper on the basis of the previously cumulative knowledge as well as the results of various researches. This paper provides knowledge which may be useful in the programs promoting CSR.Corporate social responsibility, Supportive policies, Romania

Communities at a Crossroads. Material semiotics for online sociability in the fade of cyberculture

How to conceptualize online sociability in the 21st century? To answer this question, Communities at a Crossroads looks back at the mid-2000s. With the burst of the creative-entrepreneur alliance, the territorialization of the internet and the commercialization of interpersonal ties, that period constituted a turning point for digital communitarian cultures. Many of the techno-libertarian culture\u2019s utopias underpinning the ideas for online sociability faced systematic counter evidence. This change in paradigm has still consequences today. Avoiding both empty invocations of community and swift conclusions of doom, Annalisa Pelizza investigates the theories of actions that have underpinned the development of techno-social digital assemblages after the \u2018golden age\u2019 of online communities. Communities at a Crossroads draws upon the analysis of Ars Electronica\u2019s Digital Communities archive, which is the largest of its kind worldwide, and in doing so presents a multi-faceted picture of internet sociability between the two centuries. Privileging an anti-essentialist, performative approach over sociological understandings of online communities, Communities at a Crossroads proposes a radical epistemological turn. It argues that in order to conceptualize contemporary online sociability, we need first to abandon the techno-libertarian communalist rhetoric. Then, it is necessary to move beyond the foundational distinction between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft, and adopt a material semiotic approach. In the end, we might have to relinquish the effort to define online or digital communities and engage in more meaningful mapping exercises

Tracing back Communities. An Analysis of Ars Electronica's Digital Communities archive from an ANT perspective

Since long before the popularization of the Web, community-making has been a significant driving force for the development of the Internet. As a consequence, in mid 1990s online communities became a key object of study at the intersection of social sciences, organizational studies and computer sciences. Today, about fifteen years after these early studies, the concept \u2018online community\u2019 seems to be at stake. As a matter of fact, while communitarian ties enabled by digital media are more and more invocated, in late 2000s the Internet is revealing itself as a much more bureaucratic and profit-oriented domain than ever, to the point that it is not clear whether there exist online ties that are specific enough to be called \u2018communitarian\u2019. In order to analyse such an opaque and unstable object of study as current techno-social assemblages, innovative methods specifically developed to study fuzzy objects have to be devised and some epistemological questions have to be addressed. This research starts indeed from the impasse that the digital communitarian culture is experiencing at the end of the 2000s and borrows some epistemological insights from the Actor-Network Theory. By analyzing the entry forms submitted to the world\u2019s leading competition for digital communities, Prix Ars Electronica, this research thus calls into question some \u2018black-boxed\u2019 concepts like \u2018cyberculture\u2019, \u2018digital revolution\u2019, \u2018empowerment\u2019 and \u2018online community\u2019 itself. On one hand, the results bring into question both leading sociological positions and hype-generated commonplaces. On the other hand, the results offer evidence to those arguments according to which current ICT developments represent the beginning of a new phase of technological enclosure

Entrepreneurial inference in the high-technology start-up: a model for optimised decision making and principled praxis

This study investigates antecedents to inquiry and creative decision making in situations characterised by unpredictable, rapid technological change; focussing on the kind of change witnessed since the advent of massively interconnected ‘Web2.0’ technologies. How agents of business creation interact with such technologies are viewed through the lenses of traditional theory, systems theory and process theory; each of which leads to novel theoretical and practical conclusions relating to change and agency. The ‘high-tech’ entrepreneur operating in the technologically dynamic setting of the technology start-up was chosen as the agent of analysis. Grounded theory was used to effect a textual analysis of interview narratives provided by fifteen such entrepreneurial respondents, each of whom responded to three research questions relating to change, decision making and creativity. Three conceptually dominant core categories - sensemaking, structured inquiry and principled praxis - emerged as analysis of the data advanced, suggesting a three-tiered, progressive structure to the inquiry. Sensemaking centred around foundational concepts relating to the generation and early formation of enterprise building such as narrative, structure-agency, and habitus; and in so doing exhibited synergy with a number of existing sociological theories concerning group and individual action in organizational settings. Structured inquiry focussed on concepts relating to individual and group inquiry and modes of learning in high-velocity, technological settings; and Principled praxis emerged as a consolidated ‘master conceptual category’, premised upon an aggregate/idealised mode of praxis where sense had been made and inquiry was well-defined. The concept of Principled praxis therefore represented the cumulative emergent outcome of the research endeavour, from which a theoretical construct of the ideal entrepreneurial mindset could be advanced. The construct was applied towards the formulation of a set of best-practice decision-making heuristics. Informed by a critical systems approach to the analysis, elements of practical reasoning as well as ethical components guided by the philosophies of Kant and the pragmatism of Peirce contributed to the philosophical justification of the emergent theory. An adaptive form of ‘entrepreneurial inference’ for the new ‘information’ economy is hereby proposed; the aim of which is to encourage ethically sound decision making according to a critically informed set of best-practice heuristics

Criticism in the absence of criticism

English abstract: Criticism is defined as the examination and judgment about someone or something. This definition includes, at first, an analytical task -with a particular methodology related to it- and, at second, a synthetic activity, translated into a value judgment on what is previously analyzed. Criticism can be done in different ways and depths: from the basic critical thinking -essentially descriptive- to the most truthful one –the poetic criticism-, that transcends pure description or analysis and refers itself to the internal coherence of the object. Any criticism that seeks to reduce the distance to the truth will address both to the intrinsic object relationships -or own laws- and to the extrinsic ones. Furthermore, an objective criticism provides a knowledge of the object regardless of the observer or frame of reference. This provides an effective method and a guaranteed way to approach to the knowledge of the object. Does this mean that without a regular critical method no criticism is undertaken? The proposal of this paper is to explain how a critical thought can be undertaken in the absence of criticism, in which there is no explicit value judgment. Taking the hypothesis that there is criticism in the absence of criticism, an architectural work –either being a building, a writing on architecture, etc.- that implies a tacit criticism could work on two levels: as a practical result –built, literary, etc.- and as a critical thought. The hypothesis proposes that such duality, criticism and practice, may come together in a single work. Although not in any. The existence of criticism in the absence of criticism will depend on the nature of the object and, with no doubt, on the speaker and receiver. At first glance, the guarantees provided by this criticism in the absence of criticism seem less tan through the orthodox one, in which the subject is the weakest part of the chain. However, the absence of explicit value judgment can lead to a series of stimuli –coherency, aesthetic, recreational or other- that, in certain contexts, do more viable the approach to the knowledge than through the conventional method. Spanish abstract: La crítica se define como el examen y juicio acerca de alguien o algo. Esta definición comprende, por un lado, una tarea analítica -con una determinada metodología asociada- y, por otro, una actividad sintética, traducida en un juicio de valor acerca de lo previamente analizado. La crítica puede hacerse de distinta forma y con distinto grado de profundidad: desde la más básica –fundamentalmente, la crítica descriptiva- hasta la más veraz -la crítica poética-, que trasciende la descripción o el análi sis puro y se refiere a la coherencia interna del objeto de estudio. Toda crítica que pretenda reducir la distancia de aproximación a la verdad se ocupará tanto de las relaciones intrínsecas o leyes propias del objeto como de las eelaciones extrínsecas al mismo. Por otro lado, una crítica objetiva facilita el conocimiento del objeto de estudio independientemente del observador o del marco de referencia, lo que la convierte en un método eficaz y con garantías para la aproximación al conocimiento del objeto. Pero ¿significa esto que sin crítica ortodoxa no puede existir crítica?. La propuesta de esta comunicación es dilucidar hasta qué punto puede emprenderse una crítica en ausencia de crítica, es decir, una crítica en la que no sea explícito el juicio de valor. Tomando como hipótesis el hecho de que exista crítica en ausencia de crítica, una obra arquitectónica –ya sea un edificio construido, un escrito sobre arquitectura, etc.- que implique una crítica tácita podría funcionar a dos niveles: como producto práctico -edificado, literario, etc.- y como reflexión crítica. La hipótesis planteada propone que tal dualidad, la crítica y la práctica, pueda confluir en una misma obra. Aunque no en cualquiera. La existencia de crítica en ausencia de crítica dependerá de la naturaleza de la obra y, sin lugar a dudas, del emisor y el receptor del mensaje crítico. A primera vista, las garantías que ofrece la crítica en ausencia de crítica parecen menores que mediante la crítica ortodoxa, para la que el sujeto es la parte más débil de la cadena. Sin embargo, la ausencia de juicio de valor explícito puede comportar una serie de estímulos – de coherencia, estéticos, lúdicos, prácticos o de otra índole- que, en determinados contextos, hagan más viable y clara la comprensión de la obra que a través del método convencional