What is the incidence of methotrexate or leflunomide discontinuation related to cytopenia, liver enzyme elevation or kidney function decline?

OBJECTIVES: To examine incidence of treatment changes due to abnormal blood-test results and, to explore rates of treatment changes due to liver, kidney and haematological blood-test abnormalities in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD) treated with low-dose methotrexate or leflunomide. METHODS: Data for people with AIRDs prescribed methotrexate or leflunomide were extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants were followed-up from first prescription of methotrexate or leflunomide in primary-care. Primary outcome of interest was drug discontinuation, defined as a prescription gap of ≥ 90 days following an abnormal (or severely abnormal) blood-test result. Dose reduction was examined between consecutive prescriptions. Incidence rates per 1,000 person-years were calculated. RESULTS: 15,670 and 2,689 participants contributing 46,571 and 4,558 person-years follow-up were included in methotrexate and leflunomide cohorts respectively. The incidence of methotrexate and leflunomide discontinuation with abnormal (severely abnormal) blood-test was 42.24(6.16) and 106.53(9.42)/1,000 person-years in year-1, and 22.44(2.84) and 31.69(4.40)/1,000 person-years respectively thereafter. The cumulative incidence of methotrexate and leflunomide discontinuation with abnormal (severely abnormal) blood-tests was 1 in 24(1 in 169), 1 in 9(1 in 106) at 1-year; and 1 in 45(1 in 352), 1 in 32(1 in 227) per-year respectively thereafter. Raised liver enzymes were the commonest abnormality associated with drug discontinuation. Methotrexate and leflunomide dose reduction incidence were comparable in year-1, however, thereafter methotrexate dose was reduced more often than leflunomide (16.60(95% CI; 13.05-21.13) vs. 8.10(95% CI; 4.97-13.20)/1,000 person-years). CONCLUSION: Methotrexate and leflunomide were discontinued for blood-test abnormalities after year-1 of treatment, however, discontinuations for severely abnormal results were uncommon

What is the incidence of methotrexate or leflunomide discontinuation related to cytopenia, liver enzyme elevation or kidney function decline?

OBJECTIVES: To examine incidence of treatment changes due to abnormal blood-test results and, to explore rates of treatment changes due to liver, kidney and haematological blood-test abnormalities in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD) treated with low-dose methotrexate or leflunomide. METHODS: Data for people with AIRDs prescribed methotrexate or leflunomide were extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants were followed-up from first prescription of methotrexate or leflunomide in primary-care. Primary outcome of interest was drug discontinuation, defined as a prescription gap of?=?90 days following an abnormal (or severely abnormal) blood-test result. Dose reduction was examined between consecutive prescriptions. Incidence rates per 1,000 person-years were calculated. RESULTS: 15,670 and 2,689 participants contributing 46,571 and 4,558 person-years follow-up were included in methotrexate and leflunomide cohorts respectively. The incidence of methotrexate and leflunomide discontinuation with abnormal (severely abnormal) blood-test was 42.24(6.16) and 106.53(9.42)/1,000 person-years in year-1, and 22.44(2.84) and 31.69(4.40)/1,000 person-years respectively thereafter. The cumulative incidence of methotrexate and leflunomide discontinuation with abnormal (severely abnormal) blood-tests was 1 in 24(1 in 169), 1 in 9(1 in 106) at 1-year; and 1 in 45(1 in 352), 1 in 32(1 in 227) per-year respectively thereafter. Raised liver enzymes were the commonest abnormality associated with drug discontinuation. Methotrexate and leflunomide dose reduction incidence were comparable in year-1, however, thereafter methotrexate dose was reduced more often than leflunomide (16.60(95% CI; 13.05-21.13) vs. 8.10(95% CI; 4.97-13.20)/1,000 person-years). CONCLUSION: Methotrexate and leflunomide were discontinued for blood-test abnormalities after year-1 of treatment, however, discontinuations for severely abnormal results were uncommon

BET inhibitor trotabresib in heavily pretreated patients with solid tumors and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas

B-cell lymphoma; Cancer therapy; CNS cancerLimfoma de cèl·lules B; Teràpia del càncer; Càncer del SNCLinfoma de células B; Terapia del cáncer; Cáncer del SNCBromodomain and extraterminal proteins (BET) play key roles in regulation of gene expression, and may play a role in cancer-cell proliferation, survival, and oncogenic progression. CC-90010-ST-001 (NCT03220347) is an open-label phase I study of trotabresib, an oral BET inhibitor, in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors and relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Primary endpoints were the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and RP2D of trotabresib. Secondary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD] of ≥4 months’ duration), objective response rate (CR + PR), duration of response or SD, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the pharmacokinetics (PK) of trotabresib. In addition, part C assessed the effects of food on the PK of trotabresib as a secondary endpoint. The dose escalation (part A) showed that trotabresib was well tolerated, had single-agent activity, and determined the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and schedule for the expansion study. Here, we report long-term follow-up results from part A (N = 69) and data from patients treated with the RP2D of 45 mg/day 4 days on/24 days off or an alternate RP2D of 30 mg/day 3 days on/11 days off in the dose-expansion cohorts (parts B [N = 25] and C [N = 41]). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) are reported in almost all patients. The most common severe TRAEs are hematological. Toxicities are generally manageable, allowing some patients to remain on treatment for ≥2 years, with two patients receiving ≥3 years of treatment. Trotabresib monotherapy shows antitumor activity, with an ORR of 13.0% (95% CI, 2.8–33.6) in patients with R/R DLBCL (part B) and an ORR of 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0–8.6) and a CBR of 31.7% (95% CI, 18.1–48.1) in patients with advanced solid tumors (part C). These results support further investigation of trotabresib in combination with other anticancer agents.This study was sponsored by Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company. The study sponsor was involved in the study design, analysis of data, and writing the manuscript. Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Bernard Kerr, PGDipSci, and Agata Shodeke, of Spark, funded by Bristol Myers Squibb

The Optimisation of Pre-Chemotherapy Blood Assessments through Prognostic Modelling

Background: Evidence guiding pre-chemotherapy blood assessments would enable accurate patient-planning and support the growing numbers of patients treated with chemotherapy. The aim of this PhD was to guide chemotherapy providers on the appropriate timing of pre-treatment blood assessments and develop a prognostic model to predict dose delays, mitigating the need for multiple assessments. Methods and analysis: A literature review guided retrospective data collection of risk factors for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy from four hospitals in England. Descriptive analysis was used to demonstrate changes in laboratory values of pre-chemotherapy blood tests, specifically neutrophils, when taken at different times. Using multivariable logistic regression, the relationship between potential risk factors and the outcome of a chemotherapy dose-administration delay was determined. Results: The study included 4,604 patients (2,022 breast cancer patients, 1,904 colorectal cancer patients and 678 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients) between 1 January 2013 and 1 January 2018. Of these, 616 patients had two neutrophil values within 7 days of treatment. 23% of neutrophils assessed 4-6 days prior to treatment did not meet the required threshold; these were repeated nearer to the treatment time. Among all patients, 628 (14%) experienced a second cycle treatment delay of 7 days or more. Significant variability was noted in the rate of delays at different hospitals ranging from 8% for hospital 4 to 22% for hospital 1 (P<0.005). Fourteen risk factors were pre-selected for the development of the prognostic model and fair predictive performance (concordance index 0.67) with good calibration was found. A net benefit analysis demonstrated the model was most beneficial in predicting patients receiving treatment for colorectal cancer; here the model would have value in 50% of all patients. Conclusions: The use of prognostic modelling offers an alternative to understanding a patient’s likeliness to encounter a dose delay, aiding service providers to plan accordingly and negating the need for inappropriate blood tests

Limited efficacy of APRIL CAR in patients with multiple myeloma indicate challenges in the use of natural ligands for CAR T-cell therapy

BACKGROUND: We used a proliferating ligand (APRIL) to construct a ligand-based third generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) able to target two myeloma antigens, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and transmembrane activator and CAML interactor. METHODS: The APRIL CAR was evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03287804, AUTO2) in patients with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma. Eleven patients received 13 doses, the first 15×106 CARs, and subsequent patients received 75,225,600 and 900×106 CARs in a 3+3 escalation design. RESULTS: The APRIL CAR was well tolerated. Five (45.5%) patients developed Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome and there was no neurotoxicity. However, responses were only observed in 45.5% patients (1×very good partial response, 3×partial response, 1×minimal response). Exploring the mechanistic basis for poor responses, we then compared the APRIL CAR to two other BCMA CARs in a series of in vitro assays, observing reduced interleukin-2 secretion and lack of sustained tumor control by APRIL CAR regardless of transduction method or co-stimulatory domain. There was also impaired interferon signaling of APRIL CAR and no evidence of autoactivation. Thus focusing on APRIL itself, we confirmed similar affinity to BCMA and protein stability in comparison to BCMA CAR binders but reduced binding by cell-expressed APRIL to soluble BCMA and reduced avidity to tumor cells. This indicated either suboptimal folding or stability of membrane-bound APRIL attenuating CAR activation. CONCLUSIONS: The APRIL CAR was well tolerated, but the clinical responses observed in AUTO2 were disappointing. Subsequently, when comparing the APRIL CAR to other BCMA CARs, we observed in vitro functional deficiencies due to reduced target binding by cell-expressed ligand

Rucaparib for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL3): post-progression outcomes and updated safety results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND: In ARIEL3, rucaparib maintenance treatment significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo. Here, we report prespecified, investigator-assessed, exploratory post-progression endpoints and updated safety data. METHODS: In this ongoing (enrolment complete) randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients aged 18 years or older who had platinum-sensitive, high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 who had received at least two previous platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and responded to their last platinum-based regimen were randomly assigned (2:1) to oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or placebo in 28-day cycles using a computer-generated sequence (block size of six with stratification based on homologous recombination repair gene mutation status, progression-free interval following penultimate platinum-based regimen, and best response to most recent platinum-based regimen). Patients, investigators, site staff, assessors, and the funder were masked to assignments. The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival has been previously reported. Prespecified, exploratory outcomes of chemotherapy-free interval (CFI), time to start of first subsequent therapy (TFST), time to disease progression on subsequent therapy or death (PFS2), and time to start of second subsequent therapy (TSST) and updated safety were analysed (visit cutoff Dec 31, 2017). Efficacy analyses were done in all patients randomised to three nested cohorts: patients with BRCA mutations, patients with homologous recombination deficiencies, and the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01968213. FINDINGS: Between April 7, 2014, and July 19, 2016, 564 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to rucaparib (n=375) or placebo (n=189). Median follow-up was 28·1 months (IQR 22·0-33·6). In the intention-to-treat population, median CFI was 14·3 months (95% CI 13·0-17·4) in the rucaparib group versus 8·8 months (8·0-10·3) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·43 [95% CI 0·35-0·53]; p<0·0001), median TFST was 12·4 months (11·1-15·2) versus 7·2 months (6·4-8·6; HR 0·43 [0·35-0·52]; p<0·0001), median PFS2 was 21·0 months (18·9-23·6) versus 16·5 months (15·2-18·4; HR 0·66 [0·53-0·82]; p=0·0002), and median TSST was 22·4 months (19·1-24·5) versus 17·3 months (14·9-19·4; HR 0·68 [0·54-0·85]; p=0·0007). CFI, TFST, PFS2, and TSST were also significantly longer with rucaparib than placebo in the BRCA-mutant and homologous recombination-deficient cohorts. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event of grade 3 or higher was anaemia or decreased haemoglobin (80 [22%] patients in the rucaparib group vs one [1%] patient in the placebo group). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 83 (22%) patients in the rucaparib group and 20 (11%) patients in the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths have been previously reported in this trial; there were no new treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: In these exploratory analyses over a median follow-up of more than 2 years, rucaparib maintenance treatment led to a clinically meaningful delay in starting subsequent therapy and provided lasting clinical benefits versus placebo in all three analysis cohorts. Updated safety data were consistent with previous reports. FUNDING: Clovis Oncology

Antiviral Therapy for Chronic HCV Infection - Tolerability and Outcome

This thesis describes the safety and outcome of antiviral therapy for chronic HCV infection. In the first chapters, the authors investigated (hematological) adverse events during interferon-based therapy among patients with compensated cirrhosis. By using a patient-tailored approach, interferon-based treatment can be optimized. The authors also assessed the trends in pat