446 research outputs found
Validation and Evaluation
In this technical report, we present prototypical implementations of
innovative tools and methods for personalized and contextualized (multimedia)
search, collaborative ontology evolution, ontology evaluation and cost models,
and dynamic access and trends in distributed (semantic) knowledge, developed
according to the working plan outlined in Technical Report TR-B-12-04. The
prototypes complete the next milestone on the path to an integral Corporate
Semantic Web architecture based on the three pillars Corporate Ontology
Engineering, Corporate Semantic Collaboration, and Corporate Semantic Search,
as envisioned in TR-B-08-09
Evaluation Methodologies for Visual Information Retrieval and Annotation
Die automatisierte Evaluation von Informations-Retrieval-Systemen erlaubt
Performanz und Qualität der Informationsgewinnung zu bewerten. Bereits in
den 60er Jahren wurden erste Methodologien fĂĽr die system-basierte
Evaluation aufgestellt und in den Cranfield Experimenten ĂĽberprĂĽft.
Heutzutage gehören Evaluation, Test und Qualitätsbewertung zu einem aktiven
Forschungsfeld mit erfolgreichen Evaluationskampagnen und etablierten
Methoden. Evaluationsmethoden fanden zunächst in der Bewertung von
Textanalyse-Systemen Anwendung. Mit dem rasanten Voranschreiten der
Digitalisierung wurden diese Methoden sukzessive auf die Evaluation von
Multimediaanalyse-Systeme übertragen. Dies geschah häufig, ohne die
Evaluationsmethoden in Frage zu stellen oder sie an die veränderten
Gegebenheiten der Multimediaanalyse anzupassen. Diese Arbeit beschäftigt
sich mit der system-basierten Evaluation von Indizierungssystemen fĂĽr
Bildkollektionen. Sie adressiert drei Problemstellungen der Evaluation von
Annotationen: Nutzeranforderungen fĂĽr das Suchen und Verschlagworten von
Bildern, Evaluationsmaße für die Qualitätsbewertung von
Indizierungssystemen und Anforderungen an die Erstellung visueller
Testkollektionen. Am Beispiel der Evaluation automatisierter
Photo-Annotationsverfahren werden relevante Konzepte mit Bezug zu
Nutzeranforderungen diskutiert, Möglichkeiten zur Erstellung einer
zuverlässigen Ground Truth bei geringem Kosten- und Zeitaufwand vorgestellt
und Evaluationsmaße zur Qualitätsbewertung eingeführt, analysiert und
experimentell verglichen. Traditionelle MaĂźe zur Ermittlung der Performanz
werden in vier Dimensionen klassifiziert. EvaluationsmaĂźe vergeben
üblicherweise binäre Kosten für korrekte und falsche Annotationen. Diese
Annahme steht im Widerspruch zu der Natur von Bildkonzepten. Das gemeinsame
Auftreten von Bildkonzepten bestimmt ihren semantischen Zusammenhang und
von daher sollten diese auch im Zusammenhang auf ihre Richtigkeit hin
ĂĽberprĂĽft werden. In dieser Arbeit wird aufgezeigt, wie semantische
Ähnlichkeiten visueller Konzepte automatisiert abgeschätzt und in den
Evaluationsprozess eingebracht werden können. Die Ergebnisse der Arbeit
inkludieren ein Nutzermodell fĂĽr die konzeptbasierte Suche von Bildern,
eine vollständig bewertete Testkollektion und neue Evaluationsmaße für die
anforderungsgerechte Qualitätsbeurteilung von Bildanalysesystemen.Performance assessment plays a major role in the research on Information
Retrieval (IR) systems. Starting with the Cranfield experiments in the
early 60ies, methodologies for the system-based performance assessment
emerged and established themselves, resulting in an active research field
with a number of successful benchmarking activities. With the rise of the
digital age, procedures of text retrieval evaluation were often transferred
to multimedia retrieval evaluation without questioning their direct
applicability. This thesis investigates the problem of system-based
performance assessment of annotation approaches in generic image
collections. It addresses three important parts of annotation evaluation,
namely user requirements for the retrieval of annotated visual media,
performance measures for multi-label evaluation, and visual test
collections. Using the example of multi-label image annotation evaluation,
I discuss which concepts to employ for indexing, how to obtain a reliable
ground truth to moderate costs, and which evaluation measures are
appropriate. This is accompanied by a thorough analysis of related work on
system-based performance assessment in Visual Information Retrieval (VIR).
Traditional performance measures are classified into four dimensions and
investigated according to their appropriateness for visual annotation
evaluation. One of the main ideas in this thesis adheres to the common
assumption on the binary nature of the score prediction dimension in
annotation evaluation. However, the predicted concepts and the set of true
indexed concepts interrelate with each other. This work will show how to
utilise these semantic relationships for a fine-grained evaluation
scenario. Outcomes of this thesis result in a user model for concept-based
image retrieval, a fully assessed image annotation test collection, and a
number of novel performance measures for image annotation evaluation
Evaluation Methodologies for Visual Information Retrieval and Annotation
Die automatisierte Evaluation von Informations-Retrieval-Systemen erlaubt
Performanz und Qualität der Informationsgewinnung zu bewerten. Bereits in
den 60er Jahren wurden erste Methodologien fĂĽr die system-basierte
Evaluation aufgestellt und in den Cranfield Experimenten ĂĽberprĂĽft.
Heutzutage gehören Evaluation, Test und Qualitätsbewertung zu einem aktiven
Forschungsfeld mit erfolgreichen Evaluationskampagnen und etablierten
Methoden. Evaluationsmethoden fanden zunächst in der Bewertung von
Textanalyse-Systemen Anwendung. Mit dem rasanten Voranschreiten der
Digitalisierung wurden diese Methoden sukzessive auf die Evaluation von
Multimediaanalyse-Systeme übertragen. Dies geschah häufig, ohne die
Evaluationsmethoden in Frage zu stellen oder sie an die veränderten
Gegebenheiten der Multimediaanalyse anzupassen. Diese Arbeit beschäftigt
sich mit der system-basierten Evaluation von Indizierungssystemen fĂĽr
Bildkollektionen. Sie adressiert drei Problemstellungen der Evaluation von
Annotationen: Nutzeranforderungen fĂĽr das Suchen und Verschlagworten von
Bildern, Evaluationsmaße für die Qualitätsbewertung von
Indizierungssystemen und Anforderungen an die Erstellung visueller
Testkollektionen. Am Beispiel der Evaluation automatisierter
Photo-Annotationsverfahren werden relevante Konzepte mit Bezug zu
Nutzeranforderungen diskutiert, Möglichkeiten zur Erstellung einer
zuverlässigen Ground Truth bei geringem Kosten- und Zeitaufwand vorgestellt
und Evaluationsmaße zur Qualitätsbewertung eingeführt, analysiert und
experimentell verglichen. Traditionelle MaĂźe zur Ermittlung der Performanz
werden in vier Dimensionen klassifiziert. EvaluationsmaĂźe vergeben
üblicherweise binäre Kosten für korrekte und falsche Annotationen. Diese
Annahme steht im Widerspruch zu der Natur von Bildkonzepten. Das gemeinsame
Auftreten von Bildkonzepten bestimmt ihren semantischen Zusammenhang und
von daher sollten diese auch im Zusammenhang auf ihre Richtigkeit hin
ĂĽberprĂĽft werden. In dieser Arbeit wird aufgezeigt, wie semantische
Ähnlichkeiten visueller Konzepte automatisiert abgeschätzt und in den
Evaluationsprozess eingebracht werden können. Die Ergebnisse der Arbeit
inkludieren ein Nutzermodell fĂĽr die konzeptbasierte Suche von Bildern,
eine vollständig bewertete Testkollektion und neue Evaluationsmaße für die
anforderungsgerechte Qualitätsbeurteilung von Bildanalysesystemen.Performance assessment plays a major role in the research on Information
Retrieval (IR) systems. Starting with the Cranfield experiments in the
early 60ies, methodologies for the system-based performance assessment
emerged and established themselves, resulting in an active research field
with a number of successful benchmarking activities. With the rise of the
digital age, procedures of text retrieval evaluation were often transferred
to multimedia retrieval evaluation without questioning their direct
applicability. This thesis investigates the problem of system-based
performance assessment of annotation approaches in generic image
collections. It addresses three important parts of annotation evaluation,
namely user requirements for the retrieval of annotated visual media,
performance measures for multi-label evaluation, and visual test
collections. Using the example of multi-label image annotation evaluation,
I discuss which concepts to employ for indexing, how to obtain a reliable
ground truth to moderate costs, and which evaluation measures are
appropriate. This is accompanied by a thorough analysis of related work on
system-based performance assessment in Visual Information Retrieval (VIR).
Traditional performance measures are classified into four dimensions and
investigated according to their appropriateness for visual annotation
evaluation. One of the main ideas in this thesis adheres to the common
assumption on the binary nature of the score prediction dimension in
annotation evaluation. However, the predicted concepts and the set of true
indexed concepts interrelate with each other. This work will show how to
utilise these semantic relationships for a fine-grained evaluation
scenario. Outcomes of this thesis result in a user model for concept-based
image retrieval, a fully assessed image annotation test collection, and a
number of novel performance measures for image annotation evaluation
Human-machine cooperation in large-scale multimedia retrieval : a survey
Large-Scale Multimedia Retrieval(LSMR) is the task to fast analyze a large amount of multimedia data like images or videos and accurately find the ones relevant to a certain semantic meaning. Although LSMR has been investigated for more than two decades in the fields of multimedia processing and computer vision, a more interdisciplinary approach is necessary to develop an LSMR system that is really meaningful for humans. To this end, this paper aims to stimulate attention to the LSMR problem from diverse research fields. By explaining basic terminologies in LSMR, we first survey several representative methods in chronological order. This reveals that due to prioritizing the generality and scalability for large-scale data, recent methods interpret semantic meanings with a completely different mechanism from humans, though such humanlike mechanisms were used in classical heuristic-based methods. Based on this, we discuss human-machine cooperation, which incorporates knowledge about human interpretation into LSMR without sacrificing the generality and scalability. In particular, we present three approaches to human-machine cooperation (cognitive, ontological, and adaptive), which are attributed to cognitive science, ontology engineering, and metacognition, respectively. We hope that this paper will create a bridge to enable researchers in different fields to communicate about the LSMR problem and lead to a ground-breaking next generation of LSMR systems
Human-Machine Cooperation in Large-Scale Multimedia Retrieval: A Survey
Large-Scale Multimedia Retrieval(LSMR) is the task to fast analyze a large amount of multimedia data like images or videos and accurately find the ones relevant to a certain semantic meaning. Although LSMR has been investigated for more than two decades in the fields of multimedia processing and computer vision, a more interdisciplinary approach is necessary to develop an LSMR system that is really meaningful for humans. To this end, this paper aims to stimulate attention to the LSMR problem from diverse research fields. By explaining basic terminologies in LSMR, we first survey several representative methods in chronological order. This reveals that due to prioritizing the generality and scalability for large-scale data, recent methods interpret semantic meanings with a completely different mechanism from humans, though such humanlike mechanisms were used in classical heuristic-based methods. Based on this, we discuss human-machine cooperation, which incorporates knowledge about human interpretation into LSMR without sacrificing the generality and scalability. In particular, we present three approaches to human-machine cooperation (cognitive, ontological, and adaptive), which are attributed to cognitive science, ontology engineering, and metacognition, respectively. We hope that this paper will create a bridge to enable researchers in different fields to communicate about the LSMR problem and lead to a ground-breaking next generation of LSMR systems
Computer Science & Technology Series : XXI Argentine Congress of Computer Science. Selected papers
CACIC’15 was the 21thCongress in the CACIC series. It was organized by the School of Technology at the UNNOBA (North-West of Buenos Aires National University) in JunĂn, Buenos Aires.
The Congress included 13 Workshops with 131 accepted papers, 4 Conferences, 2 invited tutorials, different meetings related with Computer Science Education (Professors, PhD students, Curricula) and an International School with 6 courses.
CACIC 2015 was organized following the traditional Congress format, with 13 Workshops covering a diversity of dimensions of Computer Science Research. Each topic was supervised by a committee of 3-5 chairs of different Universities.
The call for papers attracted a total of 202 submissions. An average of 2.5 review reports werecollected for each paper, for a grand total of 495 review reports that involved about 191 different reviewers.
A total of 131 full papers, involving 404 authors and 75 Universities, were accepted and 24 of them were selected for this book.Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI
Computer Science & Technology Series : XXI Argentine Congress of Computer Science. Selected papers
CACIC’15 was the 21thCongress in the CACIC series. It was organized by the School of Technology at the UNNOBA (North-West of Buenos Aires National University) in JunĂn, Buenos Aires.
The Congress included 13 Workshops with 131 accepted papers, 4 Conferences, 2 invited tutorials, different meetings related with Computer Science Education (Professors, PhD students, Curricula) and an International School with 6 courses.
CACIC 2015 was organized following the traditional Congress format, with 13 Workshops covering a diversity of dimensions of Computer Science Research. Each topic was supervised by a committee of 3-5 chairs of different Universities.
The call for papers attracted a total of 202 submissions. An average of 2.5 review reports werecollected for each paper, for a grand total of 495 review reports that involved about 191 different reviewers.
A total of 131 full papers, involving 404 authors and 75 Universities, were accepted and 24 of them were selected for this book.Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI
- …