Using ACL2 to Verify Loop Pipelining in Behavioral Synthesis

Behavioral synthesis involves compiling an Electronic System-Level (ESL) design into its Register-Transfer Level (RTL) implementation. Loop pipelining is one of the most critical and complex transformations employed in behavioral synthesis. Certifying the loop pipelining algorithm is challenging because there is a huge semantic gap between the input sequential design and the output pipelined implementation making it infeasible to verify their equivalence with automated sequential equivalence checking techniques. We discuss our ongoing effort using ACL2 to certify loop pipelining transformation. The completion of the proof is work in progress. However, some of the insights developed so far may already be of value to the ACL2 community. In particular, we discuss the key invariant we formalized, which is very different from that used in most pipeline proofs. We discuss the needs for this invariant, its formalization in ACL2, and our envisioned proof using the invariant. We also discuss some trade-offs, challenges, and insights developed in course of the project.Comment: In Proceedings ACL2 2014, arXiv:1406.123

Hybrid Multiresolution Simulation & Model Checking: Network-On-Chip Systems

abstract: Designers employ a variety of modeling theories and methodologies to create functional models of discrete network systems. These dynamical models are evaluated using verification and validation techniques throughout incremental design stages. Models created for these systems should directly represent their growing complexity with respect to composition and heterogeneity. Similar to software engineering practices, incremental model design is required for complex system design. As a result, models at early increments are significantly simpler relative to real systems. While experimenting (verification or validation) on models at early increments are computationally less demanding, the results of these experiments are less trustworthy and less rewarding. At any increment of design, a set of tools and technique are required for controlling the complexity of models and experimentation. A complex system such as Network-on-Chip (NoC) may benefit from incremental design stages. Current design methods for NoC rely on multiple models developed using various modeling frameworks. It is useful to develop frameworks that can formalize the relationships among these models. Fine-grain models are derived using their coarse-grain counterparts. Moreover, validation and verification capability at various design stages enabled through disciplined model conversion is very beneficial. In this research, Multiresolution Modeling (MRM) is used for system level design of NoC. MRM aids in creating a family of models at different levels of scale and complexity with well-formed relationships. In addition, a variant of the Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS) formalism is proposed which supports model checking. Hierarchical models of Network-on-Chip components may be created at different resolutions while each model can be validated using discrete-event simulation and verified via state exploration. System property expressions are defined in the DEVS language and developed as Transducers which can be applied seamlessly for model checking and simulation purposes. Multiresolution Modeling with verification and validation capabilities of this framework complement one another. MRM manages the scale and complexity of models which in turn can reduces V&V time and effort and conversely the V&V helps ensure correctness of models at multiple resolutions. This framework is realized through extending the DEVS-Suite simulator and its applicability demonstrated for exemplar NoC models.Dissertation/ThesisDoctoral Dissertation Computer Science 201

Synchronous Digital Circuits as Functional Programs

Functional programming techniques have been used to describe synchronous digital circuits since the early 1980s and have proven successful at describing certain types of designs. Here we survey the systems and formal underpinnings that constitute this tradition. We situate these techniques with respect to other formal methods for hardware design and discuss the work yet to be done

Emerging trends proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics: TPHOLs 2004

technical reportThis volume constitutes the proceedings of the Emerging Trends track of the 17th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLs 2004) held September 14-17, 2004 in Park City, Utah, USA. The TPHOLs conference covers all aspects of theorem proving in higher order logics as well as related topics in theorem proving and verification. There were 42 papers submitted to TPHOLs 2004 in the full research cate- gory, each of which was refereed by at least 3 reviewers selected by the program committee. Of these submissions, 21 were accepted for presentation at the con- ference and publication in volume 3223 of Springer?s Lecture Notes in Computer Science series. In keeping with longstanding tradition, TPHOLs 2004 also offered a venue for the presentation of work in progress, where researchers invite discussion by means of a brief introductory talk and then discuss their work at a poster session. The work-in-progress papers are held in this volume, which is published as a 2004 technical report of the School of Computing at the University of Utah

Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design – FMCAD 2022

The Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD) is an annual conference on the theory and applications of formal methods in hardware and system verification. FMCAD provides a leading forum to researchers in academia and industry for presenting and discussing groundbreaking methods, technologies, theoretical results, and tools for reasoning formally about computing systems. FMCAD covers formal aspects of computer-aided system design including verification, specification, synthesis, and testing

Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design – FMCAD 2022

The Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD) is an annual conference on the theory and applications of formal methods in hardware and system verification. FMCAD provides a leading forum to researchers in academia and industry for presenting and discussing groundbreaking methods, technologies, theoretical results, and tools for reasoning formally about computing systems. FMCAD covers formal aspects of computer-aided system design including verification, specification, synthesis, and testing

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationOver the last decade, cyber-physical systems (CPSs) have seen significant applications in many safety-critical areas, such as autonomous automotive systems, automatic pilot avionics, wireless sensor networks, etc. A Cps uses networked embedded computers to monitor and control physical processes. The motivating example for this dissertation is the use of fault- tolerant routing protocol for a Network-on-Chip (NoC) architecture that connects electronic control units (Ecus) to regulate sensors and actuators in a vehicle. With a network allowing Ecus to communicate with each other, it is possible for them to share processing power to improve performance. In addition, networked Ecus enable flexible mapping to physical processes (e.g., sensors, actuators), which increases resilience to Ecu failures by reassigning physical processes to spare Ecus. For the on-chip routing protocol, the ability to tolerate network faults is important for hardware reconfiguration to maintain the normal operation of a system. Adding a fault-tolerance feature in a routing protocol, however, increases its design complexity, making it prone to many functional problems. Formal verification techniques are therefore needed to verify its correctness. This dissertation proposes a link-fault-tolerant, multiflit wormhole routing algorithm, and its formal modeling and verification using two different methodologies. An improvement upon the previously published fault-tolerant routing algorithm, a link-fault routing algorithm is proposed to relax the unrealistic node-fault assumptions of these algorithms, while avoiding deadlock conservatively by appropriately dropping network packets. This routing algorithm, together with its routing architecture, is then modeled in a process-algebra language LNT, and compositional verification techniques are used to verify its key functional properties. As a comparison, it is modeled using channel-level VHDL which is compiled to labeled Petri-nets (LPNs). Algorithms for a partial order reduction method on LPNs are given. An optimal result is obtained from heuristics that trace back on LPNs to find causally related enabled predecessor transitions. Key observations are made from the comparison between these two verification methodologies

Structural model checking

The introduction of symbolic approaches, based on Binary Decision Diagrams (BDD), to Model Checking has led to significant improvements in Formal Verification, by allowing the analysis of very large systems, such as complex circuit designs. These were previously beyond the reach of traditional, explicit methods, due to the state space explosion phenomenon. However, after the initial success, the BDD technology has peaked, due to a similar problem, the BDD explosion.;We present a new approach to symbolic Model Checking that is based on exploiting the system structure. This technique is characterized by several unique features, including an encoding of states with Multiway Decision Diagrams (MDD) and of transitions with boolean Kronecker matrices. This approach naturally captures the property of event locality, inherently present in the class of globally asynchronous/locally synchronous systems.;The most important contribution of our work is the saturation algorithm for state space construction. Using saturation, the peak size of the MDD (luring the exploration is drastically reduced, often to sizes equal or comparable to the final MDD size, which makes it optimal in these terms. Subsequently, saturation can achieve similar reductions in runtimes. When compared to the leading state-of-the art tools based on traditional symbolic approaches, saturation is up to 100,000 times faster and uses up to 1,000 times less memory. This enables our approach to study much larger systems than ever considered. Following the success in state space exploration, we extend the applicability of the saturation algorithm to CTL Model Checking, and also to efficient generation of shortest length counterexamples for safety properties, with similar results.;This approach to automatic verification is implemented in the tool SMART. We test the new model checker on a real life, industrial size application: the NASA Runway Safety Monitor (RSM). The analysis exposes a number of potential problems with the decision procedure designed to signal all hazardous situations during takeoff and landing procedures on runways. Attempts to verify RSM with other model checkers (NuSMV, SPIN) fail due to excessive memory consumption, showing that our structural method is superior to existing symbolic approaches

Conception, optimisation, et vérification formelle de techniques de tolérance aux fautes pour circuits

Technology shrinking and voltage scaling increase the risk of fault occurrences in digital circuits. To address this challenge, engineers use fault-tolerance techniques to mask or, at least, to detect faults. These techniques are especially needed in safety critical domains (e.g., aerospace, medical, nuclear, etc.), where ensuring the circuit functionality and fault-tolerance is crucial. However, the verification of functional and fault-tolerance properties is a complex problem that cannot be solved with simulation-based methodologies due to the need to check a huge number of executions and fault occurrence scenarios. The optimization of the overheads imposed by fault-tolerance techniques also requires the proof that the circuit keeps its fault-tolerance properties after the optimization.In this work, we propose a verification-based optimization of existing fault-tolerance techniques as well as the design of new techniques and their formal verification using theorem proving. We first investigate how some majority voters can be removed from Triple-Modular Redundant (TMR) circuits without violating their fault-tolerance properties. The developed methodology clarifies how to take into account circuit native error-masking capabilities that may exist due to the structure of the combinational part or due to the way the circuit is used and communicates with the surrounding device.Second, we propose a family of time-redundant fault-tolerance techniques as automatic circuit transformations. They require less hardware resources than TMR alternatives and could be easily integrated in EDA tools. The transformations are based on the novel idea of dynamic time redundancy that allows the redundancy level to be changed "on-the-fly" without interrupting the computation. Therefore, time-redundancy can be used only in critical situations (e.g., above Earth poles where the radiation level is increased), during the processing of crucial data (e.g., the encryption of selected data), or during critical processes (e.g., a satellite computer reboot).Third, merging dynamic time redundancy with a micro-checkpointing mechanism, we have created a double-time redundancy transformation capable of masking transient faults. Our technique makes the recovery procedure transparent and the circuit input/output behavior remains unchanged even under faults. Due to the complexity of that method and the need to provide full assurance of its fault-tolerance capabilities, we have formally certified the technique using the Coq proof assistant. The developed proof methodology can be applied to certify other fault-tolerance techniques implemented through circuit transformations at the netlist level.La miniaturisation de la gravure et l'ajustement dynamique du voltage augmentent le risque de fautes dans les circuits intégrés. Pour pallier cet inconvénient, les ingénieurs utilisent des techniques de tolérance aux fautes pour masquer ou, au moins, détecter les fautes. Ces techniques sont particulièrement utilisées dans les domaines critiques (aérospatial, médical, nucléaire, etc.) où les garanties de bon fonctionnement des circuits et leurs tolérance aux fautes sont cruciales. Cependant, la vérification de propriétés fonctionnelles et de tolérance aux fautes est un problème complexe qui ne peut être résolu par simulation en raison du grand nombre d'exécutions possibles et de scénarios d'occurrence des fautes. De même, l'optimisation des surcoûts matériels ou temporels imposés par ces techniques demande de garantir que le circuit conserve ses propriétés de tolérance aux fautes après optimisation.Dans cette thèse, nous décrivons une optimisation de techniques de tolérance aux fautes classiques basée sur des analyses statiques, ainsi que de nouvelles techniques basées sur la redondance temporelle. Nous présentons comment leur correction peut être vérifiée formellement à l'aide d'un assistant de preuves.Nous étudions d'abord comment certains voteurs majoritaires peuvent être supprimés des circuits basés sur la redondance matérielle triple (TMR) sans violer leurs propriétés de tolérance. La méthodologie développée prend en compte les particularités des circuits (par ex. masquage logique d'erreurs) et des entrées/sorties pour optimiser la technique TMR.Deuxièmement, nous proposons une famille de techniques utilisant la redondance temporelle comme des transformations automatiques de circuits. Elles demandent moins de ressources matérielles que TMR et peuvent être facilement intégrés dans les outils de CAO. Les transformations sont basées sur une nouvelle idée de redondance temporelle dynamique qui permet de modifier le niveau de redondance «à la volée» sans interrompre le calcul. Le niveau de redondance peut être augmenté uniquement dans les situations critiques (par exemple, au-dessus des pôles où le niveau de rayonnement est élevé), lors du traitement de données cruciales (par exemple, le cryptage de données sensibles), ou pendant des processus critiques (par exemple, le redémarrage de l'ordinateur d'un satellite).Troisièmement, en associant la redondance temporelle dynamique avec un mécanisme de micro-points de reprise, nous proposons une transformation avec redondance temporelle double capable de masquer les fautes transitoires. La procédure de recouvrement est transparente et le comportement entrée/sortie du circuit reste identique même lors d'occurrences de fautes. En raison de la complexité de cette méthode, la garantie totale de sa correction a nécessité une certification formelle en utilisant l'assistant de preuves Coq. La méthodologie développée peut être appliquée pour certifier d'autres techniques de tolérance aux fautes exprimées comme des transformations de circuits