17,196 research outputs found
Towards declarative diagnosis of constraint programs over finite domains
The paper proposes a theoretical approach of the debugging of constraint
programs based on a notion of explanation tree. The proposed approach is an
attempt to adapt algorithmic debugging to constraint programming. In this
theoretical framework for domain reduction, explanations are proof trees
explaining value removals. These proof trees are defined by inductive
definitions which express the removals of values as consequences of other value
removals. Explanations may be considered as the essence of constraint
programming. They are a declarative view of the computation trace. The
diagnosis consists in locating an error in an explanation rooted by a symptom.Comment: In M. Ronsse, K. De Bosschere (eds), proceedings of the Fifth
International Workshop on Automated Debugging (AADEBUG 2003), September 2003,
Ghent. cs.SE/030902
Tracing and Explaining Execution of CLP(FD) Programs
Previous work in the area of tracing CLP(FD) programs mainly focuses on
providing information about control of execution and domain modification. In
this paper, we present a trace structure that provides information about
additional important aspects. We incorporate explanations in the trace
structure, i.e. reasons for why certain solver actions occur. Furthermore, we
come up with a format for describing the execution of the filtering algorithms
of global constraints. Some new ideas about the design of the trace are also
presented. For example, we have modeled our trace as a nested block structure
in order to achieve a hierarchical view. Also, new ways about how to represent
and identify different entities such as constraints and domain variables are
presented.Comment: 16 pages; Alexandre Tessier, editor; WLPE 2002,
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cs.SE/020705
Logic-Based Decision Support for Strategic Environmental Assessment
Strategic Environmental Assessment is a procedure aimed at introducing
systematic assessment of the environmental effects of plans and programs. This
procedure is based on the so-called coaxial matrices that define dependencies
between plan activities (infrastructures, plants, resource extractions,
buildings, etc.) and positive and negative environmental impacts, and
dependencies between these impacts and environmental receptors. Up to now, this
procedure is manually implemented by environmental experts for checking the
environmental effects of a given plan or program, but it is never applied
during the plan/program construction. A decision support system, based on a
clear logic semantics, would be an invaluable tool not only in assessing a
single, already defined plan, but also during the planning process in order to
produce an optimized, environmentally assessed plan and to study possible
alternative scenarios. We propose two logic-based approaches to the problem,
one based on Constraint Logic Programming and one on Probabilistic Logic
Programming that could be, in the future, conveniently merged to exploit the
advantages of both. We test the proposed approaches on a real energy plan and
we discuss their limitations and advantages.Comment: 17 pages, 1 figure, 26th Int'l. Conference on Logic Programming
(ICLP'10
Experience with mural in formalising Dust-Expert
The mural system was an outcome of a significant effort to develop a support tool for the effective use of a full formal methods development cycle. Experience with it, however, has been limited to a small number of illustrative examples that have been carried out by those closely associated with its development and implementation. This paper aims to remedy this situation by describing the experience of using mural for specifying Dust-Expert, an expert system for the relief venting of dust explosions in chemical processes. The paper begins by summarising the main requirements for Dust-Expert, and then gives a ¯avour of the VDM speci®cation that was formalised using mural.
The experience of using mural is described with respect to users' expectations that a formal methods tool should: (i) spot any inconsistencies; (ii) help manage and organise the specifications and allow one to easily add, access, update and delete specifications; (iii) help manage and carry out the refinement process; (iv) help manage and organise theories; (v) help manage and carry out proofs. The paper concludes by highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of mural that could be of interest to those developing the next generation of formal methods development tools
- …