27,657 research outputs found

    Upper bounds on the k-forcing number of a graph

    Full text link
    Given a simple undirected graph GG and a positive integer kk, the kk-forcing number of GG, denoted Fk(G)F_k(G), is the minimum number of vertices that need to be initially colored so that all vertices eventually become colored during the discrete dynamical process described by the following rule. Starting from an initial set of colored vertices and stopping when all vertices are colored: if a colored vertex has at most kk non-colored neighbors, then each of its non-colored neighbors becomes colored. When k=1k=1, this is equivalent to the zero forcing number, usually denoted with Z(G)Z(G), a recently introduced invariant that gives an upper bound on the maximum nullity of a graph. In this paper, we give several upper bounds on the kk-forcing number. Notable among these, we show that if GG is a graph with order nβ‰₯2n \ge 2 and maximum degree Ξ”β‰₯k\Delta \ge k, then Fk(G)≀(Ξ”βˆ’k+1)nΞ”βˆ’k+1+min⁑{Ξ΄,k}F_k(G) \le \frac{(\Delta-k+1)n}{\Delta - k + 1 +\min{\{\delta,k\}}}. This simplifies to, for the zero forcing number case of k=1k=1, Z(G)=F1(G)≀ΔnΞ”+1Z(G)=F_1(G) \le \frac{\Delta n}{\Delta+1}. Moreover, when Ξ”β‰₯2\Delta \ge 2 and the graph is kk-connected, we prove that Fk(G)≀(Ξ”βˆ’2)n+2Ξ”+kβˆ’2F_k(G) \leq \frac{(\Delta-2)n+2}{\Delta+k-2}, which is an improvement when k≀2k\leq 2, and specializes to, for the zero forcing number case, Z(G)=F1(G)≀(Ξ”βˆ’2)n+2Ξ”βˆ’1Z(G)= F_1(G) \le \frac{(\Delta -2)n+2}{\Delta -1}. These results resolve a problem posed by Meyer about regular bipartite circulant graphs. Finally, we present a relationship between the kk-forcing number and the connected kk-domination number. As a corollary, we find that the sum of the zero forcing number and connected domination number is at most the order for connected graphs.Comment: 15 pages, 0 figure

    Dynamic approach to k-forcing

    Get PDF
    The k-forcing number of a graph is a generalization of the zero forcing number. In this note, we give a greedy algorithm to approximate the k-forcing number of a graph. Using this dynamic approach, we give corollaries which improve upon two theorems from a recent paper of Amos, Caro, Davila and Pepper [2], while also answering an open problem posed by Meyer [9]
    • …
    corecore