Formal Linguistic Models and Knowledge Processing. A Structuralist Approach to Rule-Based Ontology Learning and Population

2013 - 2014The main aim of this research is to propose a structuralist approach for knowledge processing by means of ontology learning and population, achieved starting from unstructured and structured texts. The method suggested includes distributional semantic approaches and NL formalization theories, in order to develop a framework, which relies upon deep linguistic analysis... [edited by author]XIII n.s

Computational approaches to semantic change (Volume 6)

Semantic change — how the meanings of words change over time — has preoccupied scholars since well before modern linguistics emerged in the late 19th and early 20th century, ushering in a new methodological turn in the study of language change. Compared to changes in sound and grammar, semantic change is the least understood. Ever since, the study of semantic change has progressed steadily, accumulating a vast store of knowledge for over a century, encompassing many languages and language families. Historical linguists also early on realized the potential of computers as research tools, with papers at the very first international conferences in computational linguistics in the 1960s. Such computational studies still tended to be small-scale, method-oriented, and qualitative. However, recent years have witnessed a sea-change in this regard. Big-data empirical quantitative investigations are now coming to the forefront, enabled by enormous advances in storage capability and processing power. Diachronic corpora have grown beyond imagination, defying exploration by traditional manual qualitative methods, and language technology has become increasingly data-driven and semantics-oriented. These developments present a golden opportunity for the empirical study of semantic change over both long and short time spans

Unsupervised and Knowledge-free Learning of Compound Splits and Periphrases

Abstract. We present an approach for knowledge-free and unsupervised recognition of compound nouns for languages that use one-wordcompounds such as Germanic and Scandinavian languages. Our approach works by creating a candidate list of compound splits based on the word list of a large corpus. Then, we filter this list using the following criteria: (a) frequencies of compounds and parts, (b) length of parts. In a second step, we search the corpus for periphrases, that is a reformulation of the (single-word) compound using the parts and very high frequency words (which are usually prepositions or determiners). This step excludes spurious candidate splits at cost of recall. To increase recall again, we train a trie-based classifier that also allows splitting multipart-compounds iteratively. We evaluate our method for both steps and with various parameter settings for German against a manually created gold standard, showing promising results above 80 % precision for the splits and about half of the compounds periphrased correctly. Our method is language independent to a large extent, since we use neither knowledge about the language nor other language-dependent preprocessing tools. For compounding languages, this method can drastically alleviate the lexicon acquisition bottleneck, since even rare or yet unseen compounds can now be periphrased: the analysis then only needs to have the parts described in the lexicon, not the compound itself.