In-Context Ability Transfer for Question Decomposition in Complex QA

Answering complex questions is a challenging task that requires question decomposition and multistep reasoning for arriving at the solution. While existing supervised and unsupervised approaches are specialized to a certain task and involve training, recently proposed prompt-based approaches offer generalizable solutions to tackle a wide variety of complex question-answering (QA) tasks. However, existing prompt-based approaches that are effective for complex QA tasks involve expensive hand annotations from experts in the form of rationales and are not generalizable to newer complex QA scenarios and tasks. We propose, icat (In-Context Ability Transfer) which induces reasoning capabilities in LLMs without any LLM fine-tuning or manual annotation of in-context samples. We transfer the ability to decompose complex questions to simpler questions or generate step-by-step rationales to LLMs, by careful selection from available data sources of related tasks. We also propose an automated uncertainty-aware exemplar selection approach for selecting examples from transfer data sources. Finally, we conduct large-scale experiments on a variety of complex QA tasks involving numerical reasoning, compositional complex QA, and heterogeneous complex QA which require decomposed reasoning. We show that ICAT convincingly outperforms existing prompt-based solutions without involving any model training, showcasing the benefits of re-using existing abilities.Comment: 10 page

Improvements to the complex question answering models

x, 128 leaves : ill. ; 29 cmIn recent years the amount of information on the web has increased dramatically. As a result, it has become a challenge for the researchers to find effective ways that can help us query and extract meaning from these large repositories. Standard document search engines try to address the problem by presenting the users a ranked list of relevant documents. In most cases, this is not enough as the end-user has to go through the entire document to find out the answer he is looking for. Question answering, which is the retrieving of answers to natural language questions from a document collection, tries to remove the onus on the end-user by providing direct access to relevant information. This thesis is concerned with open-domain complex question answering. Unlike simple questions, complex questions cannot be answered easily as they often require inferencing and synthesizing information from multiple documents. Hence, we considered the task of complex question answering as query-focused multi-document summarization. In this thesis, to improve complex question answering we experimented with both empirical and machine learning approaches. We extracted several features of different types (i.e. lexical, lexical semantic, syntactic and semantic) for each of the sentences in the document collection in order to measure its relevancy to the user query. We have formulated the task of complex question answering using reinforcement framework, which to our best knowledge has not been applied for this task before and has the potential to improve itself by fine-tuning the feature weights from user feedback. We have also used unsupervised machine learning techniques (random walk, manifold ranking) and augmented semantic and syntactic information to improve them. Finally we experimented with question decomposition where instead of trying to find the answer of the complex question directly, we decomposed the complex question into a set of simple questions and synthesized the answers to get our final result

Answering Complex Questions by Joining Multi-Document Evidence with Quasi Knowledge Graphs

Direct answering of questions that involve multiple entities and relations is a challenge for text-based QA. This problem is most pronounced when answers can be found only by joining evidence from multiple documents. Curated knowledge graphs (KGs) may yield good answers, but are limited by their inherent incompleteness and potential staleness. This paper presents QUEST, a method that can answer complex questions directly from textual sources on-the-fly, by computing similarity joins over partial results from different documents. Our method is completely unsupervised, avoiding training-data bottlenecks and being able to cope with rapidly evolving ad hoc topics and formulation style in user questions. QUEST builds a noisy quasi KG with node and edge weights, consisting of dynamically retrieved entity names and relational phrases. It augments this graph with types and semantic alignments, and computes the best answers by an algorithm for Group Steiner Trees. We evaluate QUEST on benchmarks of complex questions, and show that it substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines

ExTaSem! Extending, Taxonomizing and Semantifying Domain Terminologies

We introduce EXTASEM!, a novel approach for the automatic learning of lexical taxonomies from domain terminologies. First, we exploit a very large semantic network to collect thousands of in-domain textual definitions. Second, we extract (hyponym, hypernym) pairs from each definition with a CRF-based algorithm trained on manuallyvalidated data. Finally, we introduce a graph induction procedure which constructs a full-fledged taxonomy where each edge is weighted according to its domain pertinence. EXTASEM! achieves state-of-the-art results in the following taxonomy evaluation experiments: (1) Hypernym discovery, (2) Reconstructing gold standard taxonomies, and (3) Taxonomy quality according to structural measures. We release weighted taxonomies for six domains for the use and scrutiny of the communit