Unsupervised Discovery of Gendered Language through Latent-Variable Modeling

Studying the ways in which language is gendered has long been an area of interest in sociolinguistics. Studies have explored, for example, the speech of male and female characters in film and the language used to describe male and female politicians. In this paper, we aim not to merely study this phenomenon qualitatively, but instead to quantify the degree to which the language used to describe men and women is different and, moreover, different in a positive or negative way. To that end, we introduce a generative latent-variable model that jointly represents adjective (or verb) choice, with its sentiment, given the natural gender of a head (or dependent) noun. We find that there are significant differences between descriptions of male and female nouns and that these differences align with common gender stereotypes: Positive adjectives used to describe women are more often related to their bodies than adjectives used to describe men.Comment: To appear in ACL 201

Computational Sociolinguistics: A Survey

Language is a social phenomenon and variation is inherent to its social nature. Recently, there has been a surge of interest within the computational linguistics (CL) community in the social dimension of language. In this article we present a survey of the emerging field of "Computational Sociolinguistics" that reflects this increased interest. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of CL research on sociolinguistic themes, featuring topics such as the relation between language and social identity, language use in social interaction and multilingual communication. Moreover, we demonstrate the potential for synergy between the research communities involved, by showing how the large-scale data-driven methods that are widely used in CL can complement existing sociolinguistic studies, and how sociolinguistics can inform and challenge the methods and assumptions employed in CL studies. We hope to convey the possible benefits of a closer collaboration between the two communities and conclude with a discussion of open challenges.Comment: To appear in Computational Linguistics. Accepted for publication: 18th February, 201

Social Measurement and Causal Inference with Text

The digital age has dramatically increased access to large-scale collections of digitized text documents. These corpora include, for example, digital traces from social media, decades of archived news reports, and transcripts of spoken interactions in political, legal, and economic spheres. For social scientists, this new widespread data availability has potential for improved quantitative analysis of relationships between language use and human thought, actions, and societal structure. However, the large-scale nature of these collections means that traditional manual approaches to analyzing content are extremely costly and do not scale. Furthermore, incorporating unstructured text data into quantitative analysis is difficult due to texts’ high-dimensional nature and linguistic complexity. This thesis blends (a) the computational strengths of natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning to automate and scale-up quantitative text analysis with (b) two themes central to social scientific studies but often under-addressed in NLP: measurement—creating quantifiable summaries of empirical phenomena—and causal inference—estimating the effects of interventions. First, we address measuring class prevalence in document collections; we contribute a generative probabilistic modeling approach to prevalence estimation and show empirically that our model is more robust to shifts in class priors between training and inference. Second, we examine cross- document entity-event measurement; we contribute an empirical pipeline and a novel latent disjunction model to identify the names of civilians killed by police from our corpus of web-scraped news reports. Third, we gather and categorize applications that use text to reduce confounding from causal estimates and contribute a list of open problems as well as guidance about data processing and evaluation decisions in this area. Finally, we contribute a new causal research design to estimate the natural indirect and direct effects of social group signals (e.g. race or gender) on conversational outcomes with separate aspects of language as causal mediators; this chapter is motivated by a theoretical case study of U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments and the effect of an advocate’s gender on interruptions from justices. We conclude by discussing the relationship between measurement and causal inference with text and future work at this intersection

Politische Maschinen: Maschinelles Lernen für das Verständnis von sozialen Maschinen

This thesis investigates human-algorithm interactions in sociotechnological ecosystems. Specifically, it applies machine learning and statistical methods to uncover political dimensions of algorithmic influence in social media platforms and automated decision making systems. Based on the results, the study discusses the legal, political and ethical consequences of algorithmic implementations.Diese Arbeit untersucht Mensch-Algorithmen-Interaktionen in sozio-technologischen Ökosystemen. Sie wendet maschinelles Lernen und statistische Methoden an, um politische Dimensionen des algorithmischen Einflusses auf Socialen Medien und automatisierten Entscheidungssystemen aufzudecken. Aufgrund der Ergebnisse diskutiert die Studie die rechtlichen, politischen und ethischen Konsequenzen von algorithmischen Anwendungen

Survey of Social Bias in Vision-Language Models

In recent years, the rapid advancement of machine learning (ML) models, particularly transformer-based pre-trained models, has revolutionized Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Computer Vision (CV) fields. However, researchers have discovered that these models can inadvertently capture and reinforce social biases present in their training datasets, leading to potential social harms, such as uneven resource allocation and unfair representation of specific social groups. Addressing these biases and ensuring fairness in artificial intelligence (AI) systems has become a critical concern in the ML community. The recent introduction of pre-trained vision-and-language (VL) models in the emerging multimodal field demands attention to the potential social biases present in these models as well. Although VL models are susceptible to social bias, there is a limited understanding compared to the extensive discussions on bias in NLP and CV. This survey aims to provide researchers with a high-level insight into the similarities and differences of social bias studies in pre-trained models across NLP, CV, and VL. By examining these perspectives, the survey aims to offer valuable guidelines on how to approach and mitigate social bias in both unimodal and multimodal settings. The findings and recommendations presented here can benefit the ML community, fostering the development of fairer and non-biased AI models in various applications and research endeavors