1,059 research outputs found

    ๋Œ€ํ˜• ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ UAS์™€ TLS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™,2019. 8. ์ด๋™๊ทผ.๋Œ€ํ˜•์žฌ๋‚œ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ „์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋Œ€์‘๋‹จ๊ณ„๊นŒ์ง€ ์ „๊ณผ์ •์˜ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ด๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๋Œ€์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธ๋ช…, ์žฌ์‚ฐ, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ˜•์žฌ๋‚œ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ ๋Œ€์‘ ๊ณผ์ • ์ค‘ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์— ์ง‘์ค‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€ํ˜•ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์ธ ์ธก์ •์ด ์–ด๋ ต๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์ด์ „์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง, ์›๊ฒฉํƒ์‚ฌ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ๊ทผ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” UAS (Unmanned Aerial System)๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ์˜ ๋น„๊ต์™€ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. UAS๋Š” UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜์ƒ์„ ์ทจ๋“ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ณผ์ •์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. UAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ์ ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ฒŒ TLS (Terrestrial Laser Scanning)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ธก๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ทธ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ ๋˜ํ•œ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹์ƒ, ๊ฑด์ถ•, ํ† ๋ชฉ, ๋ฌธํ™”์žฌ, ์ง€ํ˜•์ธก๋Ÿ‰ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€ํ˜•ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ๋˜ํ•œ TLS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ• ํ›„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ๋น„์šฉ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ œ์•ฝ์‚ฌํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ™œ์šฉ์ด ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํฌ๊ฒŒ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” UAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊ณผ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰์ด๋‹ค. UAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋น„ํ–‰๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” TLS ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ UAS ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ ๋น„๊ต์™€ ๋ถ„์„์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ M3C2์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์ด๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์œตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ UAS, TLS, ์œตํ•ฉ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์„ธ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด์™€ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์š” ๋น„ํ–‰๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋น„ํ–‰๊ณ ๋„์™€ ์˜์ƒ์˜ ์ค‘๋ณต๋„์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด์™ธ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ง€์ƒ๊ธฐ์ค€์  ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ์™ธ์—๋„ ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ํ‘œ์ •, ์ง๋ฒŒ์˜ ํ”๋“ค๋ฆผ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด 56๊ฐœ์˜ ์ผ€์ด์Šค ์ค‘ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์™€๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๊ณ ๋„์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ๋‚˜๋Š” ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” DW (Distance covered on the ground by on image in Width direction)์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋„์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 56๊ฐœ์˜ ์ผ€์ด์Šค ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ •ํ™•๋„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์œ ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด์™€ ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์€ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋“ค์—์„œ๋Š” ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ œ๊ฐ๊ฐ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ UAS ์ตœ์  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. M3C2์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ UAS์™€ TLS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด, ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์žฅ๋‹จ์ ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ •ํ™•๋„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, UAS๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ RMSE๋Š” 0.032m, TLS์˜ RMSE๋Š” 0.202m๋กœ UAS์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์œตํ•ฉํ•œ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ RMSE๋Š” 0.030m๋กœ์จ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ์ค‘์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, UAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๋„์ถœ๋จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋Œ€ํ˜•ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, UAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๋ชจํ˜• ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊นŒ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„๋œ ๋น„์šฉ์ด TLS์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ ์€ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ์†Œ๋น„๋œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€ํ˜•์žฌ๋‚œ ์‹œ ๋น„๊ต์  ๋‹จ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์ถœํ•œ UAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ๋Œ€ํ˜• ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์‚ฐ์ •๊ณผ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์— ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.Damage to people, property, and the environment must be minimized through systematic and efficient handling of large-scale disasters throughout the entire process from prevention to the response stage. This study focused on the waste quantity calculations that are part of the response process during large-scale disasters. Studies on large-scale waste quantity calculations have been performed in the past, but actual measurements are difficult. Therefore, many studies are being performed on using information from previous instances to perform modeling and using technologies such as remote sensing to estimate waste quantities. This study calculated waste quantities based on UAS (unmanned aerial system), which is a technology that is often used these days. It evaluated the accuracy of this technology, and it analyzed and compared the technology with existing technologies. UAS can be seen as an overall process of using UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) to capture images and analyzing them. Studies have been conducted in the past on using UAS to build 3D spatial information and evaluate accuracy, and they are being used integrally in a variety of fields. Similarly, 3D spatial information can be built using TLS (Terrestrial Laser Scanning), and these are chiefly used in the surveying field. This methods accuracy is excellent, and it is widely used in a variety of fields such as vegetation, construction, civil engineering, cultural assets, and topographical surveys. Large-scale waste can also be calculated by using TLS to build a 3D spatial information, but it is seen as unfeasible to use due to cost and time limitations. This study is broadly divided into 3 parts. The first part is examining the feasibility of using UAS to build a 3D spatial information and calculate waste quantity. The process up to the point of using UAS to build a 3D spatial information was analyzed in detail, and optimal flight variables and other variables were found in order to examine the feasibility of calculating waste quantity. The second part is comparing and analyzing 3D spatial information based on TLS and UAS technology. The 3D spatial information were compared and analyzed using the M3C2 algorithm, and the optimal waste quantity calculation methods were found. Finally, the third part is analyzing a combination of the 3D spatial information and the 3D spatial information efficiency. The two technologies were combined to build a 3D spatial information, and their efficiency was analyzed to find the differences between the three methodologies (UAS, TLS, and the combined method), as well as find the optimal waste quantity calculation method. The major flight variables are the flight altitude and image overlap. Another variable is the number of ground control points. In addition to this, the camera interior orientation and degree of gimbal shaking were analyzed. Through this study, the optimal variables among 56 cases were found. Unlike past studies, it was discovered that the results were contrary to previous studies due to the DW (Distance covered on the ground by on image in Width direction) in waste regions with a lot of altitude differences. Normally, as the altitude becomes lower, the accuracy of the 3D spatial information becomes higher, but in this study it was found that the accuracy became lower as the altitude became lower. The accuracy of all 56 cases was analyzed, and it was found that there is a correlation between accuracy and the amount of waste. As the accuracy of the 3D spatial information increased, the calculated waste amounts became similar. Conversely, in 3D spatial information with low accuracy, it was found that the waste amounts were different. Through this sequential process, the optimal UAS variables for calculating waste amounts were found, and it was possible to confirm the feasibility of calculating waste amounts based on 3D spatial iformation. The M3C2 algorithm was used to compare the UAS and TLS-based 3D spatial information, and by doing so, it was possible to confirm the advantages and disadvantages of each model. As for accuracy, the RMSE of the UAS-based 3D spatial information was 0.032 m, and the RMSE of the TLS model was 0.202, making the UAS models accuracy higher. The RMSE of the 3D spatial information which combined the two technologies was 0.030 m, and it showed the highest accuracy of the three methodologies. However, in terms of efficiency, the analyzed results were able to confirm that the UAS-based 3D spatial information had the optimal technology and methodology for large-scale waste amount calculations by creating a model which shows high accuracy in a short time. In addition, cost analysis results were able to confirm that the cost of building the UAS-based 3D spatial information was lower than that of TLS. During large-scale disasters, it is necessary to respond in a relatively short time to minimize damage and perform a variety of decision-making. The UAS-based 3D spatial information building method found in this study can be used for large-scale waste amount calculations and spatial decision-making.I. Introduction 1 II. Literature Review 7 1. Studies on Applying the UAS to Disaster Management 7 2. Accuracy of UAS-based 3D Model Construction 14 3. Disaster Waste Quantity 26 III. Materials and Methods 34 1. Optimal Flight Parameters for UAV Generating 3D Spatial Information 36 1.1. Design of UAV Flight 36 1.2. Photogrammetric Processing for the Acquisition of 3D Spatial Information 41 1.3. Assessment of the 3D Spatial Information Accuracy 43 1.4. Computation of the Amount of Waste 45 2. Comparison and Analysis of TLS and UAS Methodology for Optimal Volume Computation 47 2.1. TLS and UAS-based 3D Spatial Information Generation and Volume Computation 49 2.2. Comparison and Analysis of 3D Spatial Information 55 3. Multispace Fusion Methodology-based 3D Spatial Information Generating and Efficiency Analysis 57 3.1. Multispace Fusion Methodology-based 3D Spatial Information 57 3.2. Efficiency Analysis of 3D Spatial Information for Responding to Large-scale Disasters 58 III. Result and Discussion 59 1. Optimal Flight Parameters for UAV Generating 3D Spatial Information and Investigation of Feasibility 59 1.1. Generation of 3D Spatial Information using UAS 59 1.2. Assessment of the 3D Spatial Information Accuracy 64 1.3. Computation of the Amount of Waste and Optimal flights parameters 76 2. Comparison and Analysis of TLS and UAS-based 3D Spatial Information 84 2.1. Generation of 3D Spatial Information and Volume Computation using UAS 84 2.2. Spatial Comparison and Analysis 88 3. Multispace Fusion Methodology-based 3D Spatial Information Generating and Efficiency Analysis 93 3.1. Multispace Fusion Methodology-based 3D Spatial Information 93 3.2. 3D Spatial information Efficiency Analysis for Responding to Large-scale Disasters 96 IV. Conclusion 100 V. Bibliography 103Docto

    Applications of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) in Hydrology: A Review

    Get PDF
    In less than two decades, UASs (unmanned aerial systems) have revolutionized the field of hydrology, bridging the gap between traditional satellite observations and ground-based measurements and allowing the limitations of manned aircraft to be overcome. With unparalleled spatial and temporal resolutions and product-tailoring possibilities, UAS are contributing to the acquisition of large volumes of data on water bodies, submerged parameters and their interactions in different hydrological contexts and in inaccessible or hazardous locations. This paper provides a comprehensive review of 122 works on the applications of UASs in surface water and groundwater research with a purpose-oriented approach. Concretely, the review addresses: (i) the current applications of UAS in surface and groundwater studies, (ii) the type of platforms and sensors mainly used in these tasks, (iii) types of products generated from UAS-borne data, (iv) the associated advantages and limitations, and (v) knowledge gaps and future prospects of UASs application in hydrology. The first aim of this review is to serve as a reference or introductory document for all researchers and water managers who are interested in embracing this novel technology. The second aim is to unify in a single document all the possibilities, potential approaches and results obtained by different authors through the implementation of UASs

    Review article: The use of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPASs) for natural hazards monitoring and management

    Get PDF
    The number of scientific studies that consider possible applications of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPASs) for the management of natural hazards effects and the identification of occurred damages strongly increased in the last decade. Nowadays, in the scientific community, the use of these systems is not a novelty, but a deeper analysis of the literature shows a lack of codified complex methodologies that can be used not only for scientific experiments but also for normal codified emergency operations. RPASs can acquire on-demand ultra-high-resolution images that can be used for the identification of active processes such as landslides or volcanic activities but can also define the effects of earthquakes, wildfires and floods. In this paper, we present a review of published literature that describes experimental methodologies developed for the study and monitoring of natural hazard

    Efficient Semantic Segmentation on Edge Devices

    Full text link
    Semantic segmentation works on the computer vision algorithm for assigning each pixel of an image into a class. The task of semantic segmentation should be performed with both accuracy and efficiency. Most of the existing deep FCNs yield to heavy computations and these networks are very power hungry, unsuitable for real-time applications on portable devices. This project analyzes current semantic segmentation models to explore the feasibility of applying these models for emergency response during catastrophic events. We compare the performance of real-time semantic segmentation models with non-real-time counterparts constrained by aerial images under oppositional settings. Furthermore, we train several models on the Flood-Net dataset, containing UAV images captured after Hurricane Harvey, and benchmark their execution on special classes such as flooded buildings vs. non-flooded buildings or flooded roads vs. non-flooded roads. In this project, we developed a real-time UNet based model and deployed that network on Jetson AGX Xavier module

    Rice Response to Nitrogen Fertilization and Comparison of Unmanned Aerial Systems and Active Crop Canopy Sensors Vegetative Index to Estimate Rice Yield Potential

    Get PDF
    Nitrogen (N) fertilization is a key component in producing profitable, maximized rice grain yields because yield is directly affected by N fertilizer applications. Economical optimum N rate (EONR) is used to estimate where the N fertilization rate impacts rice grain yield but is still economically efficient. Three common response models, linear-plateau, quadratic-plateau, and quadratic models were used to determine the response of rice to N fertilizer to determine the optimum N fertilization rate. The objective of the first part of this study was to evaluate the models by assessing the coefficients of determination (R2), maximum rice grain yields each model produced, and the estimated EONRs of fertilization. Coefficients of determination (R2) of the linear-plateau, quadratic-plateau, and quadratic were found to be similar (0.77, 0.79, 0.78). Other factors beyond just R2 alone need to be taken into consideration when choosing which response model best fits a data set and should be used to estimate the EONR of fertilization for an individual variety. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) is a known indication of yield potential, one component needed to determine mid-season N requirements. The GreenSeeker has been the pre-dominant tool used to collect NDVI measurements. Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) have shown potential to collect NDVI measurements also. The objectives of the second part of this study were to: 1) evaluate the relationship between GreenSeeker (an active sensor) derived NDVI and UAS (a passive sensor) derived NDVI, and 2) evaluate the ability of GreenSeeker and UAS derived NDVI to estimate rice yield potential. This research was done in 2017 and 2018 at 5 locations in Louisiana. Remote sensor data was taken between panicle initiation and panicle differentiation using a GreenSeeker and UAS mounted remote sensor. All 5 locations showed a highly significant correlation between GreenSeeker and UAS derived NDVI. The linear relationship between GreenSeeker and UAS derived NDVI to rice grain yield were not similar. The different relationships could have been caused by the differences between ground and air-borne based sensors. More research will need to be conducted before UAS mounted sensors can be used to accurately predict mid-season N needs in rice

    Guidelines for the Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems in Flood Emergency Response

    Get PDF
    There is increasing interest in using Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in flood risk management activities including in response to flood events. However, there is little evidence that they are used in a structured and strategic manner to best effect. An effective response to flooding is essential if lives are to be saved and suffering alleviated. This study evaluates how UAS can be used in the preparation for and response to flood emergencies and develops guidelines for their deployment before, during and after a flood event. A comprehensive literature review and interviews, with people with practical experience of flood risk management, compared the current organizational and operational structures for flood emergency response in both England and India, and developed a deployment analysis matrix of existing UAS applications. An online survey was carried out in England to assess how the technology could be further developed to meet flood emergency response needs. The deployment analysis matrix has the potential to be translated into an Indian context and other countries. Those organizations responsible for overseeing flood risk management activities including the response to flooding events will have to keep abreast of the rapid technological advances in UAS if they are to be used to best effect

    Mapping Topobathymetry in a Shallow Tidal Environment Using Low-Cost Technology

    Get PDF
    Detailed knowledge of nearshore topography and bathymetry is required for a wide variety of purposes, including ecosystem protection, coastal management, and flood and erosion monitoring and research, among others. Both topography and bathymetry are usually studied separately; however, many scientific questions and challenges require an integrated approach. LiDAR technology is often the preferred data source for the generation of topobathymetric models, but because of its high cost, it is necessary to exploit other data sources. In this regard, the main goal of this study was to present a methodological proposal to generate a topobathymetric model, using low-cost unmanned platforms (unmanned aerial vehicle and unmanned surface vessel) in a very shallow/shallow and turbid tidal environment (Bahia Blanca estuary, Argentina). Moreover, a cross-analysis of the topobathymetric and the tide level data was conducted, to provide a classification of hydrogeomorphic zones. As a main result, a continuous terrain model was built, with a spatial resolution of approximately 0.08 m (topography) and 0.50 m (bathymetry). Concerning the structure from motion-derived topography, the accuracy gave a root mean square error of 0.09 m for the vertical plane. The best interpolated bathymetry (inverse distance weighting method), which was aligned to the topography (as reference), showed a root mean square error of 0.18 m (in average) and a mean absolute error of 0.05 m. The final topobathymetric model showed an adequate representation of the terrain, making it well suited for examining many landforms. This study helps to confirm the potential for remote sensing of shallow tidal environments by demonstrating how the data source heterogeneity can be exploited.Fil: Genchi, Sibila Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientรญficas y Tรฉcnicas. Centro Cientรญfico Tecnolรณgico Conicet - Bahรญa Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Geografรญa y Turismo; ArgentinaFil: Vitale, Alejandro Josรฉ. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientรญficas y Tรฉcnicas. Centro Cientรญfico Tecnolรณgico Conicet - Bahรญa Blanca. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografรญa. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografรญa; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Geografรญa y Turismo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ingenierรญa Elรฉctrica y de Computadoras; ArgentinaFil: Perillo, Gerardo Miguel E.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientรญficas y Tรฉcnicas. Centro Cientรญfico Tecnolรณgico Conicet - Bahรญa Blanca. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografรญa. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografรญa; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Geologรญa; ArgentinaFil: Seitz, Carina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientรญficas y Tรฉcnicas. Centro Cientรญfico Tecnolรณgico Conicet - Bahรญa Blanca. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografรญa. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografรญa; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Geologรญa; ArgentinaFil: Delrieux, Claudio Augusto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientรญficas y Tรฉcnicas. Centro Cientรญfico Tecnolรณgico Conicet - Bahรญa Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ingenierรญa Elรฉctrica y de Computadoras; Argentin

    The application of Earth Observation for mapping soil saturation and the extent and distribution of artificial drainage on Irish farms

    Get PDF
    Artificial drainage is required to make wet soils productive for farming. However, drainage may have unintended environmental consequences, for example, through increased nutrient loss to surface waters or increased flood risk. It can also have implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Accurate data on soil drainage properties could help mitigate the impact of these consequences. Unfortunately, few countries maintain detailed inventories of artificially-drained areas because of the costs involved in compiling such data. This is further confounded by often inadequate knowledge of drain location and function at farm level. Increasingly, Earth Observation (EO) data is being used map drained areas and detect buried drains. The current study is the first harmonised effort to map the location and extent of artificially-drained soils in Ireland using a suite of EO data and geocomputational techniques. To map artificially-drained areas, support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) machine learning image classifications were implemented using Landsat 8 multispectral imagery and topographical data. The RF classifier achieved overall accuracy of 91% in a binary segmentation of artifically-drained and poorly-drained classes. Compared with an existing soil drainage map, the RF model indicated that ~44% of soils in the study area could be classed as โ€œdrainedโ€. As well as spatial differences, temporal changes in drainage status where detected within a 3 hectare field, where drains installed in 2014 had an effect on grass production. Using the RF model, the area of this field identified as โ€œdrainedโ€ increased from a low of 25% in 2011 to 68% in 2016. Landsat 8 vegetation indices were also successfully applied to monitoring the recovery of pasture following extreme saturation (flooding). In conjunction with this, additional EO techniques using unmanned aerial systems (UAS) were tested to map overland flow and detect buried drains. A performance assessment of UAS structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and aerial LiDAR was undertaken for modelling surface runoff (and associated nutrient loss). Overland flow models were created using the SIMWE model in GRASS GIS. Results indicated no statistical difference between models at 1, 2 & 5 m spatial resolution (p< 0.0001). Grass height was identified as an important source of error. Thermal imagery from a UAS was used to identify the locations of artifically drained areas. Using morning and afternoon images to map thermal extrema, significant differences in the rate of heating were identified between drained and undrained locations. Locations of tiled and piped drains were identified with 59 and 64% accuracy within the study area. Together these methods could enable better management of field drainage on farms, identifying drained areas, as well as the need for maintenance or replacement. They can also assess whether treatments have worked as expected or whether the underlying saturation problems continues. Through the methods developed and described herein, better characterisation of drainage status at field level may be achievable

    A Routine and Post-disaster Road Corridor Monitoring Framework for the Increased Resilience of Road Infrastructures

    Get PDF
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore