Approaches to implement and evaluate aggregated search

La recherche d'information agrégée peut être vue comme un troisième paradigme de recherche d'information après la recherche d'information ordonnée (ranked retrieval) et la recherche d'information booléenne (boolean retrieval). Les deux paradigmes les plus explorés jusqu'à aujourd'hui retournent un ensemble ou une liste ordonnée de résultats. C'est à l'usager de parcourir ces ensembles/listes et d'en extraire l'information nécessaire qui peut se retrouver dans plusieurs documents. De manière alternative, la recherche d'information agrégée ne s'intéresse pas seulement à l'identification des granules (nuggets) d'information pertinents, mais aussi à l'assemblage d'une réponse agrégée contenant plusieurs éléments. Dans nos travaux, nous analysons les travaux liés à la recherche d'information agrégée selon un schéma général qui comprend 3 parties: dispatching de la requête, recherche de granules d'information et agrégation du résultat. Les approches existantes sont groupées autours de plusieurs perspectives générales telle que la recherche relationnelle, la recherche fédérée, la génération automatique de texte, etc. Ensuite, nous nous sommes focalisés sur deux pistes de recherche selon nous les plus prometteuses: (i) la recherche agrégée relationnelle et (ii) la recherche agrégée inter-verticale. * La recherche agrégée relationnelle s'intéresse aux relations entre les granules d'information pertinents qui servent à assembler la réponse agrégée. En particulier, nous nous sommes intéressés à trois types de requêtes notamment: requête attribut (ex. président de la France, PIB de l'Italie, maire de Glasgow, ...), requête instance (ex. France, Italie, Glasgow, Nokia e72, ...) et requête classe (pays, ville française, portable Nokia, ...). Pour ces requêtes qu'on appelle requêtes relationnelles nous avons proposés trois approches pour permettre la recherche de relations et l'assemblage des résultats. Nous avons d'abord mis l'accent sur la recherche d'attributs qui peut aider à répondre aux trois types de requêtes. Nous proposons une approche à large échelle capable de répondre à des nombreuses requêtes indépendamment de la classe d'appartenance. Cette approche permet l'extraction des attributs à partir des tables HTML en tenant compte de la qualité des tables et de la pertinence des attributs. Les différentes évaluations de performances effectuées prouvent son efficacité qui dépasse les méthodes de l'état de l'art. Deuxièmement, nous avons traité l'agrégation des résultats composés d'instances et d'attributs. Ce problème est intéressant pour répondre à des requêtes de type classe avec une table contenant des instances (lignes) et des attributs (colonnes). Pour garantir la qualité du résultat, nous proposons des pondérations sur les instances et les attributs promouvant ainsi les plus représentatifs. Le troisième problème traité concerne les instances de la même classe (ex. France, Italie, Allemagne, ...). Nous proposons une approche capable d'identifier massivement ces instances en exploitant les listes HTML. Toutes les approches proposées fonctionnent à l'échelle Web et sont importantes et complémentaires pour la recherche agrégée relationnelle. Enfin, nous proposons 4 prototypes d'application de recherche agrégée relationnelle. Ces derniers peuvent répondre des types de requêtes différents avec des résultats relationnels. Plus précisément, ils recherchent et assemblent des attributs, des instances, mais aussi des passages et des images dans des résultats agrégés. Un exemple est la requête ``Nokia e72" dont la réponse sera composée d'attributs (ex. prix, poids, autonomie batterie, ...), de passages (ex. description, reviews, ...) et d'images. Les résultats sont encourageants et illustrent l'utilité de la recherche agrégée relationnelle. * La recherche agrégée inter-verticale s'appuie sur plusieurs moteurs de recherche dits verticaux tel que la recherche d'image, recherche vidéo, recherche Web traditionnelle, etc. Son but principal est d'assembler des résultats provenant de toutes ces sources dans une même interface pour répondre aux besoins des utilisateurs. Les moteurs de recherche majeurs et la communauté scientifique nous offrent déjà une série d'approches. Notre contribution consiste en une étude sur l'évaluation et les avantages de ce paradigme. Plus précisément, nous comparons 4 types d'études qui simulent des situations de recherche sur un total de 100 requêtes et 9 sources différentes. Avec cette étude, nous avons identifiés clairement des avantages de la recherche agrégée inter-verticale et nous avons pu déduire de nombreux enjeux sur son évaluation. En particulier, l'évaluation traditionnelle utilisée en RI, certes la moins rapide, reste la plus réaliste. Pour conclure, nous avons proposé des différents approches et études sur deux pistes prometteuses de recherche dans le cadre de la recherche d'information agrégée. D'une côté, nous avons traité trois problèmes importants de la recherche agrégée relationnelle qui ont porté à la construction de 4 prototypes d'application avec des résultats encourageants. De l'autre côté, nous avons mis en place 4 études sur l'intérêt et l'évaluation de la recherche agrégée inter-verticale qui ont permis d'identifier les enjeux d'évaluation et les avantages du paradigme. Comme suite à long terme de ce travail, nous pouvons envisager une recherche d'information qui intègre plus de granules relationnels et plus de multimédia.Aggregated search or aggregated retrieval can be seen as a third paradigm for information retrieval following the Boolean retrieval paradigm and the ranked retrieval paradigm. In the first two, we are returned respectively sets and ranked lists of search results. It is up to the time-poor user to scroll this set/list, scan within different documents and assemble his/her information need. Alternatively, aggregated search not only aims the identification of relevant information nuggets, but also the assembly of these nuggets into a coherent answer. In this work, we present at first an analysis of related work to aggregated search which is analyzed with a general framework composed of three steps: query dispatching, nugget retrieval and result aggregation. Existing work is listed aside different related domains such as relational search, federated search, question answering, natural language generation, etc. Within the possible research directions, we have then focused on two directions we believe promise the most namely: relational aggregated search and cross-vertical aggregated search. * Relational aggregated search targets relevant information, but also relations between relevant information nuggets which are to be used to assemble reasonably the final answer. In particular, there are three types of queries which would easily benefit from this paradigm: attribute queries (e.g. president of France, GDP of Italy, major of Glasgow, ...), instance queries (e.g. France, Italy, Glasgow, Nokia e72, ...) and class queries (countries, French cities, Nokia mobile phones, ...). We call these queries as relational queries and we tackle with three important problems concerning the information retrieval and aggregation for these types of queries. First, we propose an attribute retrieval approach after arguing that attribute retrieval is one of the crucial problems to be solved. Our approach relies on the HTML tables in the Web. It is capable to identify useful and relevant tables which are used to extract relevant attributes for whatever queries. The different experimental results show that our approach is effective, it can answer many queries with high coverage and it outperforms state of the art techniques. Second, we deal with result aggregation where we are given relevant instances and attributes for a given query. The problem is particularly interesting for class queries where the final answer will be a table with many instances and attributes. To guarantee the quality of the aggregated result, we propose the use of different weights on instances and attributes to promote the most representative and important ones. The third problem we deal with concerns instances of the same class (e.g. France, Germany, Italy ... are all instances of the same class). Here, we propose an approach that can massively extract instances of the same class from HTML lists in the Web. All proposed approaches are applicable at Web-scale and they can play an important role for relational aggregated search. Finally, we propose 4 different prototype applications for relational aggregated search. They can answer different types of queries with relevant and relational information. Precisely, we not only retrieve attributes and their values, but also passages and images which are assembled into a final focused answer. An example is the query ``Nokia e72" which will be answered with attributes (e.g. price, weight, battery life ...), passages (e.g. description, reviews ...) and images. Results are encouraging and they illustrate the utility of relational aggregated search. * The second research direction that we pursued concerns cross-vertical aggregated search, which consists of assembling results from different vertical search engines (e.g. image search, video search, traditional Web search, ...) into one single interface. Here, different approaches exist in both research and industry. Our contribution concerns mostly evaluation and the interest (advantages) of this paradigm. We propose 4 different studies which simulate different search situations. Each study is tested with 100 different queries and 9 vertical sources. Here, we could clearly identify new advantages of this paradigm and we could identify different issues with evaluation setups. In particular, we observe that traditional information retrieval evaluation is not the fastest but it remains the most realistic. To conclude, we propose different studies with respect to two promising research directions. On one hand, we deal with three important problems of relational aggregated search following with real prototype applications with encouraging results. On the other hand, we have investigated on the interest and evaluation of cross-vertical aggregated search. Here, we could clearly identify some of the advantages and evaluation issues. In a long term perspective, we foresee a possible combination of these two kinds of approaches to provide relational and cross-vertical information retrieval incorporating more focus, structure and multimedia in search results

Geographic information extraction from texts

A large volume of unstructured texts, containing valuable geographic information, is available online. This information – provided implicitly or explicitly – is useful not only for scientific studies (e.g., spatial humanities) but also for many practical applications (e.g., geographic information retrieval). Although large progress has been achieved in geographic information extraction from texts, there are still unsolved challenges and issues, ranging from methods, systems, and data, to applications and privacy. Therefore, this workshop will provide a timely opportunity to discuss the recent advances, new ideas, and concepts but also identify research gaps in geographic information extraction

Study on open science: The general state of the play in Open Science principles and practices at European life sciences institutes

Nowadays, open science is a hot topic on all levels and also is one of the priorities of the European Research Area. Components that are commonly associated with open science are open access, open data, open methodology, open source, open peer review, open science policies and citizen science. Open science may a great potential to connect and influence the practices of researchers, funding institutions and the public. In this paper, we evaluate the level of openness based on public surveys at four European life sciences institute

Automated Classification of Argument Stance in Student Essays: A Linguistically Motivated Approach with an Application for Supporting Argument Summarization

This study describes a set of document- and sentence-level classification models designed to automate the task of determining the argument stance (for or against) of a student argumentative essay and the task of identifying any arguments in the essay that provide reasons in support of that stance. A suggested application utilizing these models is presented which involves the automated extraction of a single-sentence summary of an argumentative essay. This summary sentence indicates the overall argument stance of the essay from which the sentence was extracted and provides a representative argument in support of that stance. A novel set of document-level stance classification features motivated by linguistic research involving stancetaking language is described. Several document-level classification models incorporating these features are trained and tested on a corpus of student essays annotated for stance. These models achieve accuracies significantly above those of two baseline models. High-accuracy features used by these models include a dependency subtree feature incorporating information about the targets of any stancetaking language in the essay text and a feature capturing the semantic relationship between the essay prompt text and stancetaking language in the essay text. We also describe the construction of a corpus of essay sentences annotated for supporting argument stance. The resulting corpus is used to train and test two sentence-level classification models. The first model is designed to classify a given sentence as a supporting argument or as not a supporting argument, while the second model is designed to classify a supporting argument as holding a for or against stance. Features motivated by influential linguistic analyses of the lexical, discourse, and rhetorical features of supporting arguments are used to build these two models, both of which achieve accuracies above their respective baseline models. An application illustrating an interesting use-case for the models presented in this dissertation is described. This application incorporates all three classification models to extract a single sentence summarizing both the overall stance of a given text along with a convincing reason in support of that stance