2,125 research outputs found
On the Unification of Process Semantics: Logical Semantics
We continue with the task of obtaining a unifying view of process semantics
by considering in this case the logical characterization of the semantics. We
start by considering the classic linear time-branching time spectrum developed
by R.J. van Glabbeek. He provided a logical characterization of most of the
semantics in his spectrum but, without following a unique pattern. In this
paper, we present a uniform logical characterization of all the semantics in
the enlarged spectrum. The common structure of the formulas that constitute all
the corresponding logics gives us a much clearer picture of the spectrum,
clarifying the relations between the different semantics, and allows us to
develop generic proofs of some general properties of the semantics.Comment: In Proceedings SOS 2011, arXiv:1108.279
Conflict vs causality in event structures
Event structures are one of the best known models for concurrency. Many variants of the basic model and many possible notions of equivalence for them have been devised in the literature. In this paper, we study how the spectrum of equivalences for Labelled Prime Event Structures built by Van Glabbeek and Goltz changes if we consider two simplified notions of event structures: the first is obtained by removing the causality relation (Coherence Spaces) and the second by removing the conflict relation (Elementary Event Structures). As expected, in both cases the spectrum turns out to be simplified, since some notions of equivalence coincide in the simplified settings; actually, we prove that removing causality simplifies the spectrum considerably more than removing conflict. Furthermore, while the labeling of events and their cardinality play no role when removing causality, both the labeling function and the cardinality of the event set dramatically influence the spectrum of equivalences in the conflict-free setting
Flexible refinement
To help make refinement more usable in practice we introduce a general, flexible model of refinement. This is defined in terms of what contexts an entity can appear in, and what observations can be made of it in those contexts.
Our general model is expressed in terms of an operational semantics, and by exploiting the well-known isomorphism between state-based relational semantics and event-based labelled transition semantics we were able to take particular models from both the state- and event-based literature, reflect on them and gradually evolve our general model. We are also able to view our general model both as a testing semantics and as a logical theory with refinement as implication.
Our general model can used as a bridge between different particular special models and using this bridge we compare the definition of determinism found in different special models. We do this because the reduction of nondeterminism underpins many definitions of refinement found in a variety of special models. To our surprise we find that the definition of determinism commonly used in the process algebra literature to be at odds with determinism as defined in other special models. In order to rectify this situation we return to the intuitions expressed by Milner in CCS and by formalising these intuitions we are able to define determinism in process algebra in such a way that it no longer at odds with the definitions we have taken from other special models. Using our abstract definition of determinism we are able to construct a new model, interactive branching programs, that is an implementable subset of process algebra. Later in the chapter we show explicitly how five special models, taken from the literature, are instances of our general model. This is done simply by fixing the sets of contexts and observations involved. Next we define vertical refinement on our general model. Vertical refinement can be seen both as a generalisation of what, in the literature, has been called action refinement or non-atomic refinement. Alternatively, by viewing a layer as a logical theory, vertical refinement is a theory morphism, formalised as a Galois connection.
By constructing a vertical refinement between broadcast processes and interactive branching programs we can see how interactive branching programs can be implemented on a platform providing broadcast communication. But we have been unable to extend this theory morphism to implement all of process algebra using broadcast communication. Upon investigation we show the problem arises with the examples that caused the problem with the definition of determinism on process algebra. Finally we illustrate the usefulness of our flexible general model by formally developing a single entity that contains events that use handshake communication and events that use broadcast communication
Graded Monads and Graded Logics for the Linear Time - Branching Time Spectrum
State-based models of concurrent systems are traditionally considered under a variety of notions of process equivalence. In the case of labelled transition systems, these equivalences range from trace equivalence to (strong) bisimilarity, and are organized in what is known as the linear time - branching time spectrum. A combination of universal coalgebra and graded monads provides a generic framework in which the semantics of concurrency can be parametrized both over the branching type of the underlying transition systems and over the granularity of process equivalence. We show in the present paper that this framework of graded semantics does subsume the most important equivalences from the linear time - branching time spectrum. An important feature of graded semantics is that it allows for the principled extraction of characteristic modal logics. We have established invariance of these graded logics under the given graded semantics in earlier work; in the present paper, we extend the logical framework with an explicit propositional layer and provide a generic expressiveness criterion that generalizes the classical Hennessy-Milner theorem to coarser notions of process equivalence. We extract graded logics for a range of graded semantics on labelled transition systems and probabilistic systems, and give exemplary proofs of their expressiveness based on our generic criterion
A Definition Scheme for Quantitative Bisimulation
FuTS, state-to-function transition systems are generalizations of labeled
transition systems and of familiar notions of quantitative semantical models as
continuous-time Markov chains, interactive Markov chains, and Markov automata.
A general scheme for the definition of a notion of strong bisimulation
associated with a FuTS is proposed. It is shown that this notion of
bisimulation for a FuTS coincides with the coalgebraic notion of behavioral
equivalence associated to the functor on Set given by the type of the FuTS. For
a series of concrete quantitative semantical models the notion of bisimulation
as reported in the literature is proven to coincide with the notion of
quantitative bisimulation obtained from the scheme. The comparison includes
models with orthogonal behaviour, like interactive Markov chains, and with
multiple levels of behavior, like Markov automata. As a consequence of the
general result relating FuTS bisimulation and behavioral equivalence we obtain,
in a systematic way, a coalgebraic underpinning of all quantitative
bisimulations discussed.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2015, arXiv:1509.0816
A robust semantics hides fewer errors
In this paper we explore how formal models are interpreted and to what degree meaning is captured in the formal semantics and to what degree it remains in the informal interpretation of the semantics. By applying a robust approach to the definition of refinement and semantics, favoured by the event-based community, to state-based theory we are able to move some aspects from the informal interpretation into the formal semantics
A Unifying Approach to Decide Relations for Timed Automata and their Game Characterization
In this paper we present a unifying approach for deciding various
bisimulations, simulation equivalences and preorders between two timed automata
states. We propose a zone based method for deciding these relations in which we
eliminate an explicit product construction of the region graphs or the zone
graphs as in the classical methods. Our method is also generic and can be used
to decide several timed relations. We also present a game characterization for
these timed relations and show that the game hierarchy reflects the hierarchy
of the timed relations. One can obtain an infinite game hierarchy and thus the
game characterization further indicates the possibility of defining new timed
relations which have not been studied yet. The game characterization also helps
us to come up with a formula which encodes the separation between two states
that are not timed bisimilar. Such distinguishing formulae can also be
generated for many relations other than timed bisimilarity.Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS/SOS 2013, arXiv:1307.690
Musings on Encodings and Expressiveness
This paper proposes a definition of what it means for one system description
language to encode another one, thereby enabling an ordering of system
description languages with respect to expressive power. I compare the proposed
definition with other definitions of encoding and expressiveness found in the
literature, and illustrate it on a case study: comparing the expressive power
of CCS and CSP.Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS/SOS 2012, arXiv:1208.244
Combining behavioural types with security analysis
Today's software systems are highly distributed and interconnected, and they
increasingly rely on communication to achieve their goals; due to their
societal importance, security and trustworthiness are crucial aspects for the
correctness of these systems. Behavioural types, which extend data types by
describing also the structured behaviour of programs, are a widely studied
approach to the enforcement of correctness properties in communicating systems.
This paper offers a unified overview of proposals based on behavioural types
which are aimed at the analysis of security properties
- ā¦