164 research outputs found
Uniform Labeled Transition Systems for Nondeterministic, Probabilistic, and Stochastic Process Calculi
Labeled transition systems are typically used to represent the behavior of
nondeterministic processes, with labeled transitions defining a one-step state
to-state reachability relation. This model has been recently made more general
by modifying the transition relation in such a way that it associates with any
source state and transition label a reachability distribution, i.e., a function
mapping each possible target state to a value of some domain that expresses the
degree of one-step reachability of that target state. In this extended
abstract, we show how the resulting model, called ULTraS from Uniform Labeled
Transition System, can be naturally used to give semantics to a fully
nondeterministic, a fully probabilistic, and a fully stochastic variant of a
CSP-like process language.Comment: In Proceedings PACO 2011, arXiv:1108.145
A uniform framework for modelling nondeterministic, probabilistic, stochastic, or mixed processes and their behavioral equivalences
Labeled transition systems are typically used as behavioral models of concurrent processes, and the labeled transitions define the a one-step state-to-state reachability relation. This model can be made generalized by modifying the transition relation to associate a state reachability distribution, rather than a single target state, with any pair of source state and transition label. The state reachability distribution becomes a function mapping each possible target state to a value that expresses the degree of one-step reachability of that state. Values are taken from a preordered set equipped with a minimum that denotes unreachability. By selecting suitable preordered sets, the resulting model, called ULTraS from Uniform Labeled Transition System, can be specialized to capture well-known models of fully nondeterministic processes (LTS), fully
probabilistic processes (ADTMC), fully stochastic processes (ACTMC), and of nondeterministic and probabilistic (MDP) or nondeterministic and stochastic (CTMDP) processes. This uniform treatment of different behavioral models extends to behavioral equivalences. These can be defined on ULTraS by relying on appropriate measure functions that expresses the degree of reachability of a set of states when performing
single-step or multi-step computations. It is shown that the specializations of bisimulation, trace, and testing
equivalences for the different classes of ULTraS coincide with the behavioral equivalences defined in the literature over traditional models
A uniform definition of stochastic process calculi
We introduce a unifying framework to provide the semantics of process algebras, including their quantitative variants useful for modeling quantitative aspects of behaviors. The unifying framework is then used to describe some of the most representative stochastic process algebras. This
provides a general and clear support for an understanding of their similarities and differences. The framework is based on State to Function Labeled Transition Systems, FuTSs for short, that are state-transition structures where each transition is a triple of the form (s; Ī±;P). The first andthe second components are the source state, s, and the label, Ī±, of the transition, while the third component is the continuation function, P, associating a value of a suitable type to each state s0. For example, in the case of stochastic process algebras the value of the continuation function on s0 represents the rate of the negative exponential distribution characterizing the duration/delay of the action performed to reach state s0 from s. We first provide the semantics of a simple formalism used to describe Continuous-Time Markov Chains, then we model a number of process algebras that permit parallel composition of models according to the two main interaction paradigms (multiparty and one-to-one synchronization). Finally, we deal with formalisms where actions and rates are kept separate and address the issues related to the coexistence of stochastic, probabilistic, and non-deterministic behaviors. For each formalism, we establish the formal correspondence between the FuTSs semantics and its original semantics
A Stochastic Broadcast Pi-Calculus
In this paper we propose a stochastic broadcast PI-calculus which can be used
to model server-client based systems where synchronization is always governed
by only one participant. Therefore, there is no need to determine the joint
synchronization rates. We also take immediate transitions into account which is
useful to model behaviors with no impact on the temporal properties of a
system. Since immediate transitions may introduce non-determinism, we will show
how these non-determinism can be resolved, and as result a valid CTMC will be
obtained finally. Also some practical examples are given to show the
application of this calculus.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2011, arXiv:1107.074
A Definition Scheme for Quantitative Bisimulation
FuTS, state-to-function transition systems are generalizations of labeled
transition systems and of familiar notions of quantitative semantical models as
continuous-time Markov chains, interactive Markov chains, and Markov automata.
A general scheme for the definition of a notion of strong bisimulation
associated with a FuTS is proposed. It is shown that this notion of
bisimulation for a FuTS coincides with the coalgebraic notion of behavioral
equivalence associated to the functor on Set given by the type of the FuTS. For
a series of concrete quantitative semantical models the notion of bisimulation
as reported in the literature is proven to coincide with the notion of
quantitative bisimulation obtained from the scheme. The comparison includes
models with orthogonal behaviour, like interactive Markov chains, and with
multiple levels of behavior, like Markov automata. As a consequence of the
general result relating FuTS bisimulation and behavioral equivalence we obtain,
in a systematic way, a coalgebraic underpinning of all quantitative
bisimulations discussed.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2015, arXiv:1509.0816
A Hierarchy of Scheduler Classes for Stochastic Automata
Stochastic automata are a formal compositional model for concurrent
stochastic timed systems, with general distributions and non-deterministic
choices. Measures of interest are defined over schedulers that resolve the
nondeterminism. In this paper we investigate the power of various theoretically
and practically motivated classes of schedulers, considering the classic
complete-information view and a restriction to non-prophetic schedulers. We
prove a hierarchy of scheduler classes w.r.t. unbounded probabilistic
reachability. We find that, unlike Markovian formalisms, stochastic automata
distinguish most classes even in this basic setting. Verification and strategy
synthesis methods thus face a tradeoff between powerful and efficient classes.
Using lightweight scheduler sampling, we explore this tradeoff and demonstrate
the concept of a useful approximative verification technique for stochastic
automata
Bisimulation of Labelled State-to-Function Transition Systems Coalgebraically
Labeled state-to-function transition systems, FuTS for short, are
characterized by transitions which relate states to functions of states over
general semirings, equipped with a rich set of higher-order operators. As such,
FuTS constitute a convenient modeling instrument to deal with process languages
and their quantitative extensions in particular. In this paper, the notion of
bisimulation induced by a FuTS is addressed from a coalgebraic point of view. A
correspondence result is established stating that FuTS-bisimilarity coincides
with behavioural equivalence of the associated functor. As generic examples,
the equivalences underlying substantial fragments of major examples of
quantitative process algebras are related to the bisimilarity of specific FuTS.
The examples range from a stochastic process language, PEPA, to a language for
Interactive Markov Chains, IML, a (discrete) timed process language, TPC, and a
language for Markov Automata, MAL. The equivalences underlying these languages
are related to the bisimilarity of their specific FuTS. By the correspondence
result coalgebraic justification of the equivalences of these calculi is
obtained. The specific selection of languages, besides covering a large variety
of process interaction models and modelling choices involving quantities,
allows us to show different classes of FuTS, namely so-called simple FuTS,
combined FuTS, nested FuTS, and general FuTS
- ā¦