Visual Aesthetics in Digital Games: A Comparative Analysis Between Photorealism and Stylized Graphicsgraphics

This dissertation starts from the assumption that every digital game has some kind of visual display. Based on that, it investigates photorealistic and stylized graphics, two popular visual styles in digital games, in order to comprehend the process of creating a prototype that incorporates those styles, as well as the technological artistic challenges of implementing each style in a solo development scenario, with the goal of assisting in the practice of designing this type of content. A literature review on digital game appearance and the development of both photorealistic and stylized styles was conducted to ground the development of a prototype. The result of the prototype creation is documented, so its findings can lead to the expansion of knowledge that can be used in practice and can inform practitioners and other designers

Analyse de l'espace des chemins pour la composition des ombres et lumières

La réalisation des films d'animation 3D s'appuie de nos jours sur les techniques de rendu physiquement réaliste, qui simulent la propagation de la lumière dans chaque scène. Dans ce contexte, les graphistes 3D doivent jouer avec les effets de lumière pour accompagner la mise en scène, dérouler la narration du film, et transmettre son contenu émotionnel aux spectateurs. Cependant, les équations qui modélisent le comportement de la lumière laissent peu de place à l'expression artistique. De plus, l'édition de l'éclairage par essai-erreur est ralentie par les longs temps de rendu associés aux méthodes physiquement réalistes, ce qui rend fastidieux le travail des graphistes. Pour pallier ce problème, les studios d'animation ont souvent recours à la composition, où les graphistes retravaillent l'image en associant plusieurs calques issus du processus de rendu. Ces calques peuvent contenir des informations géométriques sur la scène, ou bien isoler un effet lumineux intéressant. L'avantage de la composition est de permettre une interaction en temps réel, basée sur les méthodes classiques d'édition en espace image. Notre contribution principale est la définition d'un nouveau type de calque pour la composition, le calque d'ombre. Un calque d'ombre contient la quantité d'énergie perdue dans la scène à cause du blocage des rayons lumineux par un objet choisi. Comparée aux outils existants, notre approche présente plusieurs avantages pour l'édition. D'abord, sa signification physique est simple à concevoir : lorsque l'on ajoute le calque d'ombre et l'image originale, toute ombre due à l'objet choisi disparaît. En comparaison, un masque d'ombre classique représente la fraction de rayons bloqués en chaque pixel, une information en valeurs de gris qui ne peut servir que d'approximation pour guider la composition. Ensuite, le calque d'ombre est compatible avec l'éclairage global : il enregistre l'énergie perdue depuis les sources secondaires, réfléchies au moins une fois dans la scène, là où les méthodes actuelles ne considèrent que les sources primaires. Enfin, nous démontrons l'existence d'une surestimation de l'éclairage dans trois logiciels de rendu différents lorsque le graphiste désactive les ombres pour un objet ; notre définition corrige ce défaut. Nous présentons un prototype d'implémentation des calques d'ombres à partir de quelques modifications du Path Tracing, l'algorithme de choix en production. Il exporte l'image originale et un nombre arbitraire de calques d'ombres liés à différents objets en une passe de rendu, requérant un temps supplémentaire de l'ordre de 15% dans des scènes à géométrie complexe et contenant plusieurs milieux participants. Des paramètres optionnels sont aussi proposés au graphiste pour affiner le rendu des calques d'ombres.The production of 3D animated motion picture now relies on physically realistic rendering techniques, that simulate light propagation within each scene. In this context, 3D artists must leverage lighting effects to support staging, deploy the film's narrative, and convey its emotional content to viewers. However, the equations that model the behavior of light leave little room for artistic expression. In addition, editing illumination by trial-and-error is tedious due to the long render times that physically realistic rendering requires. To remedy these problems, most animation studios resort to compositing, where artists rework a frame by associating multiple layers exported during rendering. These layers can contain geometric information on the scene, or isolate a particular lighting effect. The advantage of compositing is that interactions take place in real time, and are based on conventional image space operations. Our main contribution is the definition of a new type of layer for compositing, the shadow layer. A shadow layer contains the amount of energy lost in the scene due to the occlusion of light rays by a given object. Compared to existing tools, our approach presents several advantages for artistic editing. First, its physical meaning is straightforward: when a shadow layer is added to the original image, any shadow created by the chosen object disappears. In comparison, a traditional shadow matte represents the ratio of occluded rays at a pixel, a grayscale information that can only serve as an approximation to guide compositing operations. Second, shadow layers are compatible with global illumination: they pick up energy lost from secondary light sources that are scattered at least once in the scene, whereas the current methods only consider primary sources. Finally, we prove the existence of an overestimation of illumination in three different renderers when an artist disables the shadow of an object; our definition fixes this shortcoming. We present a prototype implementation for shadow layers obtained from a few modifications of path tracing, the main rendering algorithm in production. It exports the original image and any number of shadow layers associated with different objects in a single rendering pass, with an additional 15% time in scenes containing complex geometry and multiple participating media. Optional parameters are also proposed to the artist to fine-tune the rendering of shadow layers

Digital light

Light symbolises the highest good, it enables all visual art, and today it lies at the heart of billion-dollar industries. The control of light forms the foundation of contemporary vision. Digital Light brings together artists, curators, technologists and media archaeologists to study the historical evolution of digital light-based technologies. Digital Light provides a critical account of the capacities and limitations of contemporary digital light-based technologies and techniques by tracing their genealogies and comparing them with their predecessor media. As digital light remediates multiple historical forms (photography, print, film, video, projection, paint), the collection draws from all of these histories, connecting them to the digital present and placing them in dialogue with one another.Light is at once universal and deeply historical. The invention of mechanical media (including photography and cinematography) allied with changing print technologies (half-tone, lithography) helped structure the emerging electronic media of television and video, which in turn shaped the bitmap processing and raster display of digital visual media. Digital light is, as Stephen Jones points out in his contribution, an oxymoron: light is photons, particulate and discrete, and therefore always digital. But photons are also waveforms, subject to manipulation in myriad ways. From Fourier transforms to chip design, colour management to the translation of vector graphics into arithmetic displays, light is constantly disciplined to human purposes. In the form of fibre optics, light is now the infrastructure of all our media; in urban plazas and handheld devices, screens have become ubiquitous, and also standardised. This collection addresses how this occurred, what it means, and how artists, curators and engineers confront and challenge the constraints of increasingly normalised digital visual media.While various art pieces and other content are considered throughout the collection, the focus is specifically on what such pieces suggest about the intersection of technique and technology. Including accounts by prominent artists and professionals, the collection emphasises the centrality of use and experimentation in the shaping of technological platforms. Indeed, a recurring theme is how techniques of previous media become technologies, inscribed in both digital software and hardware. Contributions include considerations of image-oriented software and file formats; screen technologies; projection and urban screen surfaces; histories of computer graphics, 2D and 3D image editing software, photography and cinematic art; and transformations of light-based art resulting from the distributed architectures of the internet and the logic of the database.Digital Light brings together high profile figures in diverse but increasingly convergent fields, from academy award-winner and co-founder of Pixar, Alvy Ray Smith to feminist philosopher Cathryn Vasseleu

Digital Light

Light symbolises the highest good, it enables all visual art, and today it lies at the heart of billion-dollar industries. The control of light forms the foundation of contemporary vision. Digital Light brings together artists, curators, technologists and media archaeologists to study the historical evolution of digital light-based technologies. Digital Light provides a critical account of the capacities and limitations of contemporary digital light-based technologies and techniques by tracing their genealogies and comparing them with their predecessor media. As digital light remediates multiple historical forms (photography, print, film, video, projection, paint), the collection draws from all of these histories, connecting them to the digital present and placing them in dialogue with one another. Light is at once universal and deeply historical. The invention of mechanical media (including photography and cinematography) allied with changing print technologies (half-tone, lithography) helped structure the emerging electronic media of television and video, which in turn shaped the bitmap processing and raster display of digital visual media. Digital light is, as Stephen Jones points out in his contribution, an oxymoron: light is photons, particulate and discrete, and therefore always digital. But photons are also waveforms, subject to manipulation in myriad ways. From Fourier transforms to chip design, colour management to the translation of vector graphics into arithmetic displays, light is constantly disciplined to human purposes. In the form of fibre optics, light is now the infrastructure of all our media; in urban plazas and handheld devices, screens have become ubiquitous, and also standardised. This collection addresses how this occurred, what it means, and how artists, curators and engineers confront and challenge the constraints of increasingly normalised digital visual media. While various art pieces and other content are considered throughout the collection, the focus is specifically on what such pieces suggest about the intersection of technique and technology. Including accounts by prominent artists and professionals, the collection emphasises the centrality of use and experimentation in the shaping of technological platforms. Indeed, a recurring theme is how techniques of previous media become technologies, inscribed in both digital software and hardware. Contributions include considerations of image-oriented software and file formats; screen technologies; projection and urban screen surfaces; histories of computer graphics, 2D and 3D image editing software, photography and cinematic art; and transformations of light-based art resulting from the distributed architectures of the internet and the logic of the database. Digital Light brings together high profile figures in diverse but increasingly convergent fields, from academy award-winner and co-founder of Pixar, Alvy Ray Smith to feminist philosopher Cathryn Vasseleu

CIRCUS 2001 Conference Proceedings: New Synergies in Digital Creativity. Conference for Content Integrated Research in Creative User Systems

CIRCUS (Content Integrated Research For Creative User Systems) was an ESPRIT Working Group, originally set up in 1988 as one of the very last additional actions in Framework 4, under DG III. Its purpose was to develop models for collaborative work between artists (the term here used in its widest sense) and technologists (ditto) and to promote these models by whatever means available. While some have criticised this aim as implicitly promoting a 1950s agenda of building bridges across C.P. Snow’s ‘two cultures’, there is no such intention here, rather that technology, particularly computer and communications technology (ICT) , is irresistibly intruding into what is normally thought of as creative work (and so practised by artists) and that, like any new technique, this has to be understood by its potential practitioners in terms of its true strengths and limitations. The specific problem that computer technology poses is that it is in principle malleable to such an extent that the limitations on its form and functionality are still barely understood, yet the people charged with the task of making the technology available have little or no understanding of the needs of creative users. What the artist usually sees is a tool which is in principle capable of being harnessed to creative ends but in practice resists being so applied. Quite often the tool is shaped more by blind economic forces than by a clear response to a specific, here creative, need. CIRCUS came into existence as a forum in which both artists and technologists could work out how best to play to the strengths of ICT and how to apply both creative and technological solutions (possibly both together) to its limitations. In particular the then new Framework V programme invited projects in such areas as new media but required them to be addressed in essentially the same old way, by technologists working towards commercialisation. The only obvious exception to this was in the area of cultural heritage which, incidentally, CIRCUS was also capable of reviewing. The scope for effective participation by artists was thus limited by an essentially technological agenda although everybody at the time, the participants of CIRCUS and programme managers in DG III, believed that we could do far better than this, and to develop new models of working which could inform the nature of Framework VI or even the later stages of F V. It is fair to say that everyone involved was excited by the idea of doing something quite new (and iconoclastic), not least the expanding of the expertise base on which future Frameworks could draw. It is also fair to say that, while not ultimately wholly original, the CIRCUS agenda was an ambitious one and the WG has had a chequered history peppered with misunderstandings perpetrated by the very people who might have thought would give the WG their strongest support. The CIRCUS idea has been aired before, specifically at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, the MIT Media Lab (and its imitators), and a recent IEEE forum. However a near total change in participation, fuelled by natural migration and a switch to DG XIII, has resulted in the CIRCUS agenda being restarted on at least one occasion and a fairly regular questioning of the principles on whose elucidation we are engaged. While this is no bad thing in principle, in practice we haven’t learned anything new from these periodic bouts of self-examination other than a reinforcement of the values our goals. On the other hand it is evident that we have made progress and have moved on a long way from where we started. A recent experience of a workshop whose agenda appeared to be to form another version of CIRCUS, this time with an overwhelmingly technological (DG III) membership, demonstrates they have a CIRCUS-worth of work to do before they will have reached where we are now. (Foreword of CIRCUS for Beginners

Design & Cinema: an analysis of the graphic language as a narrative strategy in Hollywood's contemporary films

Graphic design elements have always been part of cinema’s hybrid language, as a material of expression manifested through the visual channel, together with the cinematographic image. This graphic language is present throughout an entire filmic narrative in the form of verbal, pictorial and schematic elements applied to extra-diegetic titles and animations, as well as intra-diegetic printed or handmade graphic props, which together form a movie’s graphic identity and aid in conveying meaning to the narrative. The objective of this research is to investigate the intentional and strategic use of the graphic language in movies – also referred to as graphic configurations – as decisive or secondary elements in unfolding a narrative, contextualised into Hollywood’s contemporary cinema. Through qualitative and quantitative methods, the research develops into historical and theoretical investigations, drawing constant parallels between cinema’s and design’s fields of study, which leads to the proposal of a system for analysing a movie’s graphic strategy, by systematically recording the appearance of graphic configurations in movies and interpreting their meaning based on a set of categories and rules. This system is verified through the application to four detailed case studies, which together with the other findings present in the research, culminate in ten major conventions or guidelines for the further use of graphic configurations in the construction of any narrative film. The major conclusions also include the identification of the three main functions and levels of representation acquired by the graphic language in movies