On some modifications and applications of the post correspondence problem

The Post Correspondence Problem was introduced by Emil Post in 1946. The problem considers pairs of lists of sequences of symbols, or words, where each word has its place on the list determined by its index. The Post Correspondence Problem asks does there exist a sequence of indices so that, when we write the words in the order of the sequence as single words from both lists, the two resulting words are equal. Post proved the problem to be undecidable, that is, no algorithm deciding it can exist. A variety of restrictions and modifications have been introduced to the original formulation of the problem, that have then been shown to be either decidable or undecidable. Both the original Post Correspondence Problem and its modifications have been widely used in proving other decision problems undecidable. In this thesis we consider some modifications of the Post Correspondence Problem as well as some applications of it in undecidability proofs. We consider a modification for sequences of indices that are infinite to two directions. We also consider a modification to the original Post Correspondence Problem where instead of the words being equal for a sequence of indices, we take two sequences that are conjugates of each other. Two words are conjugates if we can write one word by taking the other and moving some part of that word from the end to the beginning. Both modifications are shown to be undecidable. We also use the Post Correspondence Problem and its modification for injective morphisms in proving two problems from formal language theory to be undecidable; the first problem is on special shuffling of words and the second problem on fixed points of rational functions

The Identity Correspondence Problem and its Applications

In this paper we study several closely related fundamental problems for words and matrices. First, we introduce the Identity Correspondence Problem (ICP): whether a finite set of pairs of words (over a group alphabet) can generate an identity pair by a sequence of concatenations. We prove that ICP is undecidable by a reduction of Post's Correspondence Problem via several new encoding techniques. In the second part of the paper we use ICP to answer a long standing open problem concerning matrix semigroups: "Is it decidable for a finitely generated semigroup S of square integral matrices whether or not the identity matrix belongs to S?". We show that the problem is undecidable starting from dimension four even when the number of matrices in the generator is 48. From this fact, we can immediately derive that the fundamental problem of whether a finite set of matrices generates a group is also undecidable. We also answer several question for matrices over different number fields. Apart from the application to matrix problems, we believe that the Identity Correspondence Problem will also be useful in identifying new areas of undecidable problems in abstract algebra, computational questions in logic and combinatorics on words.Comment: We have made some proofs clearer and fixed an important typo from the published journal version of this article, see footnote 3 on page 1

Many bounded versions of undecidable problems are NP-hard

Several physically inspired problems have been proven undecidable; examples are the spectral gap problem and the membership problem for quantum correlations. Most of these results rely on reductions from a handful of undecidable problems, such as the halting problem, the tiling problem, the Post correspondence problem or the matrix mortality problem. All these problems have a common property: they have an NP-hard bounded version. This work establishes a relation between undecidable unbounded problems and their bounded NP-hard versions. Specifically, we show that NP-hardness of a bounded version follows easily from the reduction of the unbounded problems. This leads to new and simpler proofs of the NP-hardness of bounded version of the Post correspondence problem, the matrix mortality problem, the positivity of matrix product operators, the reachability problem, the tiling problem, and the ground state energy problem. This work sheds light on the intractability of problems in theoretical physics and on the computational consequences of bounding a parameter.Comment: 10 pages and 7 pages of appendices, 8 figures; v2,v3: minor change

Digital Image

This paper considers the ontological significance of invisibility in relation to the question ‘what is a digital image?’ Its argument in a nutshell is that the emphasis on visibility comes at the expense of latency and is symptomatic of the style of thinking that dominated Western philosophy since Plato. This privileging of visible content necessarily binds images to linguistic (semiotic and structuralist) paradigms of interpretation which promote representation, subjectivity, identity and negation over multiplicity, indeterminacy and affect. Photography is the case in point because until recently critical approaches to photography had one thing in common: they all shared in the implicit and incontrovertible understanding that photographs are a medium that must be approached visually; they took it as a given that photographs are there to be looked at and they all agreed that it is only through the practices of spectatorship that the secrets of the image can be unlocked. Whatever subsequent interpretations followed, the priori- ty of vision in relation to the image remained unperturbed. This undisputed belief in the visibility of the image has such a strong grasp on theory that it imperceptibly bonded together otherwise dissimilar and sometimes contradictory methodol- ogies, preventing them from noticing that which is the most unexplained about images: the precedence of looking itself. This self-evident truth of visibility casts a long shadow on im- age theory because it blocks the possibility of inquiring after everything that is invisible, latent and hidden