4,346 research outputs found
Undecidability and Finite Automata
Using a novel rewriting problem, we show that several natural decision
problems about finite automata are undecidable (i.e., recursively unsolvable).
In contrast, we also prove three related problems are decidable. We apply one
result to prove the undecidability of a related problem about k-automatic sets
of rational numbers
The Decidability Frontier for Probabilistic Automata on Infinite Words
We consider probabilistic automata on infinite words with acceptance defined
by safety, reachability, B\"uchi, coB\"uchi, and limit-average conditions. We
consider quantitative and qualitative decision problems. We present extensions
and adaptations of proofs for probabilistic finite automata and present a
complete characterization of the decidability and undecidability frontier of
the quantitative and qualitative decision problems for probabilistic automata
on infinite words
Model-checking branching-time properties of probabilistic automata and probabilistic one-counter automata
This paper studies the problem of model-checking of probabilistic automaton
and probabilistic one-counter automata against probabilistic branching-time
temporal logics (PCTL and PCTL). We show that it is undecidable for these
problems.
We first show, by reducing to emptiness problem of probabilistic automata,
that the model-checking of probabilistic finite automata against branching-time
temporal logics are undecidable. And then, for each probabilistic automata, by
constructing a probabilistic one-counter automaton with the same behavior as
questioned probabilistic automata the undecidability of model-checking problems
against branching-time temporal logics are derived, herein.Comment: Comments are welcom
Undecidable properties of self-affine sets and multi-tape automata
We study the decidability of the topological properties of some objects
coming from fractal geometry. We prove that having empty interior is
undecidable for the sets defined by two-dimensional graph-directed iterated
function systems. These results are obtained by studying a particular class of
self-affine sets associated with multi-tape automata. We first establish the
undecidability of some language-theoretical properties of such automata, which
then translate into undecidability results about their associated self-affine
sets.Comment: 10 pages, v2 includes some corrections to match the published versio
Automaton Semigroups and Groups: On the Undecidability of Problems Related to Freeness and Finiteness
In this paper, we study algorithmic problems for automaton semigroups and
automaton groups related to freeness and finiteness. In the course of this
study, we also exhibit some connections between the algebraic structure of
automaton (semi)groups and their dynamics on the boundary. First, we show that
it is undecidable to check whether the group generated by a given invertible
automaton has a positive relation, i.e. a relation p = 1 such that p only
contains positive generators. Besides its obvious relation to the freeness of
the group, the absence of positive relations has previously been studied and is
connected to the triviality of some stabilizers of the boundary. We show that
the emptiness of the set of positive relations is equivalent to the dynamical
property that all (directed positive) orbital graphs centered at non-singular
points are acyclic.
Gillibert showed that the finiteness problem for automaton semigroups is
undecidable. In the second part of the paper, we show that this undecidability
result also holds if the input is restricted to be bi-reversible and invertible
(but, in general, not complete). As an immediate consequence, we obtain that
the finiteness problem for automaton subsemigroups of semigroups generated by
invertible, yet partial automata, so called automaton-inverse semigroups, is
also undecidable.
Erratum: Contrary to a statement in a previous version of the paper, our
approach does not show that that the freeness problem for automaton semigroups
is undecidable. We discuss this in an erratum at the end of the paper
Undecidability of recognized by measure many 1-way quantum automata
Let and be the
languages recognized by {\em measure many 1-way quantum finite automata
(MMQFA)} (or,{\em enhanced 1-way quantum finite automata(EQFA)})
with strict, resp. non-strict cut-point . We consider the languages
equivalence problem, showing that
\begin{itemize}
\item {both strict and non-strict languages equivalence are undecidable;}
\item {to do this, we provide an additional proof of the undecidability of
non-strict and strict emptiness of MMQFA(EQFA), and then reducing the languages
equivalence problem to emptiness problem;}
\item{Finally, some other Propositions derived from the above results are
collected.}
\end{itemize}Comment: Readability improved, title change
Verification for Timed Automata extended with Unbounded Discrete Data Structures
We study decidability of verification problems for timed automata extended
with unbounded discrete data structures. More detailed, we extend timed
automata with a pushdown stack. In this way, we obtain a strong model that may
for instance be used to model real-time programs with procedure calls. It is
long known that the reachability problem for this model is decidable. The goal
of this paper is to identify subclasses of timed pushdown automata for which
the language inclusion problem and related problems are decidable
MTL-Model Checking of One-Clock Parametric Timed Automata is Undecidable
Parametric timed automata extend timed automata (Alur and Dill, 1991) in that
they allow the specification of parametric bounds on the clock values. Since
their introduction in 1993 by Alur, Henzinger, and Vardi, it is known that the
emptiness problem for parametric timed automata with one clock is decidable,
whereas it is undecidable if the automaton uses three or more parametric
clocks. The problem is open for parametric timed automata with two parametric
clocks. Metric temporal logic, MTL for short, is a widely used specification
language for real-time systems. MTL-model checking of timed automata is
decidable, no matter how many clocks are used in the timed automaton. In this
paper, we prove that MTL-model checking for parametric timed automata is
undecidable, even if the automaton uses only one clock and one parameter and is
deterministic.Comment: In Proceedings SynCoP 2014, arXiv:1403.784
(Un)decidable Problems about Reachability of Quantum Systems
We study the reachability problem of a quantum system modelled by a quantum
automaton. The reachable sets are chosen to be boolean combinations of (closed)
subspaces of the state space of the quantum system. Four different reachability
properties are considered: eventually reachable, globally reachable, ultimately
forever reachable, and infinitely often reachable. The main result of this
paper is that all of the four reachability properties are undecidable in
general; however, the last three become decidable if the reachable sets are
boolean combinations without negation
- …