Recent Advances in Steganography

Steganography is the art and science of communicating which hides the existence of the communication. Steganographic technologies are an important part of the future of Internet security and privacy on open systems such as the Internet. This book's focus is on a relatively new field of study in Steganography and it takes a look at this technology by introducing the readers various concepts of Steganography and Steganalysis. The book has a brief history of steganography and it surveys steganalysis methods considering their modeling techniques. Some new steganography techniques for hiding secret data in images are presented. Furthermore, steganography in speeches is reviewed, and a new approach for hiding data in speeches is introduced

인공지능 보안

학위논문 (박사) -- 서울대학교 대학원 : 자연과학대학 협동과정 생물정보학전공, 2021. 2. 윤성로.With the development of machine learning (ML), expectations for artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have increased daily. In particular, deep neural networks have demonstrated outstanding performance in many fields. However, if a deep-learning (DL) model causes mispredictions or misclassifications, it can cause difficulty, owing to malicious external influences. This dissertation discusses DL security and privacy issues and proposes methodologies for security and privacy attacks. First, we reviewed security attacks and defenses from two aspects. Evasion attacks use adversarial examples to disrupt the classification process, and poisoning attacks compromise training by compromising the training data. Next, we reviewed attacks on privacy that can exploit exposed training data and defenses, including differential privacy and encryption. For adversarial DL, we study the problem of finding adversarial examples against ML-based portable document format (PDF) malware classifiers. We believe that our problem is more challenging than those against ML models for image processing, owing to the highly complex data structure of PDFs, compared with traditional image datasets, and the requirement that the infected PDF should exhibit malicious behavior without being detected. We propose an attack using generative adversarial networks that effectively generates evasive PDFs using a variational autoencoder robust against adversarial examples. For privacy in DL, we study the problem of avoiding sensitive data being misused and propose a privacy-preserving framework for deep neural networks. Our methods are based on generative models that preserve the privacy of sensitive data while maintaining a high prediction performance. Finally, we study the security aspect in biological domains to detect maliciousness in deoxyribonucleic acid sequences and watermarks to protect intellectual properties. In summary, the proposed DL models for security and privacy embrace a diversity of research by attempting actual attacks and defenses in various fields.인공지능 모델을 사용하기 위해서는 개인별 데이터 수집이 필수적이다. 반면 개인의 민감한 데이터가 유출되는 경우에는 프라이버시 침해의 소지가 있다. 인공지능 모델을 사용하는데 수집된 데이터가 외부에 유출되지 않도록 하거나, 익명화, 부호화 등의 보안 기법을 인공지능 모델에 적용하는 분야를 Private AI로 분류할 수 있다. 또한 인공지능 모델이 노출될 경우 지적 소유권이 무력화될 수 있는 문제점과, 악의적인 학습 데이터를 이용하여 인공지능 시스템을 오작동할 수 있고 이러한 인공지능 모델 자체에 대한 위협은 Secure AI로 분류할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 학습 데이터에 대한 공격을 기반으로 신경망의 결손 사례를 보여준다. 기존의 AEs 연구들은 이미지를 기반으로 많은 연구가 진행되었다. 보다 복잡한 heterogenous한 PDF 데이터로 연구를 확장하여 generative 기반의 모델을 제안하여 공격 샘플을 생성하였다. 다음으로 이상 패턴을 보이는 샘플을 검출할 수 있는 DNA steganalysis 방어 모델을 제안한다. 마지막으로 개인 정보 보호를 위해 generative 모델 기반의 익명화 기법들을 제안한다. 요약하면 본 논문은 인공지능 모델을 활용한 공격 및 방어 알고리즘과 신경망을 활용하는데 발생되는 프라이버시 이슈를 해결할 수 있는 기계학습 알고리즘에 기반한 일련의 방법론을 제안한다.Abstract i List of Figures vi List of Tables xiii 1 Introduction 1 2 Background 6 2.1 Deep Learning: a brief overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 Security Attacks on Deep Learning Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.2.1 Evasion Attacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.2 Poisoning Attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.3 Defense Techniques Against Deep Learning Models . . . . . . . . . 26 2.3.1 Defense Techniques against Evasion Attacks . . . . . . . . 27 2.3.2 Defense against Poisoning Attacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.4 Privacy issues on Deep Learning Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.4.1 Attacks on Privacy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 2.4.2 Defenses Against Attacks on Privacy . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3 Attacks on Deep Learning Models 47 3.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.1.1 Threat Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.1.2 Portable Document Format (PDF) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.1.3 PDF Malware Classifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.1.4 Evasion Attacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 3.2 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.2.1 Feature Extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.2.2 Feature Selection Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 3.2.3 Seed Selection for Mutation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 3.2.4 Evading Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 3.2.5 Model architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.2.6 PDF Repacking and Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.3.1 Datasets and Model Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.3.2 Target Classifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 3.3.3 CVEs for Various Types of PDF Malware . . . . . . . . . . 72 3.3.4 Malicious Signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 3.3.5 AntiVirus Engines (VirusTotal) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 3.3.6 Feature Mutation Result for Contagio . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 3.3.7 Feature Mutation Result for CVEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 3.3.8 Malicious Signature Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 3.3.9 Evasion Speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 3.3.10 AntiVirus Engines (VirusTotal) Result . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 3.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4 Defense on Deep Learning Models 88 4.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 4.1.1 Message-Hiding Regions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 4.1.2 DNA Steganography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 4.1.3 Example of Message Hiding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 4.1.4 DNA Steganalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 4.2 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 4.2.1 Notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.2.2 Proposed Model Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 4.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 4.3.1 Experiment Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 4.3.2 Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 4.3.3 Dataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 4.3.4 Model Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 4.3.5 Message Hiding Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 4.3.6 Evaluation Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 4.3.7 Performance Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 4.3.8 Analyzing Malicious Code in DNA Sequences . . . . . . . 112 4.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 5 Privacy: Generative Models for Anonymizing Private Data 115 5.1 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 5.1.1 Notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 5.1.2 Anonymization using GANs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 5.1.3 Security Principle of Anonymized GANs . . . . . . . . . . 123 5.2 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 5.2.1 Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 5.2.2 Target Classifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 5.2.3 Model Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 5.2.4 Evaluation Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 5.2.5 Comparison to Differential Privacy . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 5.2.6 Performance Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 5.3 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 6 Privacy: Privacy-preserving Inference for Deep Learning Models 132 6.1 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 6.1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 6.1.2 Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 6.1.3 Deep Private Generation Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 6.1.4 Security Principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 6.1.5 Threat to the Classifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 6.2 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 6.2.1 Datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 6.2.2 Experimental Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 6.2.3 Target Classifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 6.2.4 Model Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 6.2.5 Model Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 6.2.6 Performance Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 6.3 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 7 Conclusion 153 7.0.1 Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 7.0.2 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 Bibliography 157 Abstract in Korean 195Docto

Measuring trustworthiness of image data in the internet of things environment

Internet of Things (IoT) image sensors generate huge volumes of digital images every day. However, easy availability and usability of photo editing tools, the vulnerability in communication channels and malicious software have made forgery attacks on image sensor data effortless and thus expose IoT systems to cyberattacks. In IoT applications such as smart cities and surveillance systems, the smooth operation depends on sensors’ sharing data with other sensors of identical or different types. Therefore, a sensor must be able to rely on the data it receives from other sensors; in other words, data must be trustworthy. Sensors deployed in IoT applications are usually limited to low processing and battery power, which prohibits the use of complex cryptography and security mechanism and the adoption of universal security standards by IoT device manufacturers. Hence, estimating the trust of the image sensor data is a defensive solution as these data are used for critical decision-making processes. To our knowledge, only one published work has estimated the trustworthiness of digital images applied to forensic applications. However, that study’s method depends on machine learning prediction scores returned by existing forensic models, which limits its usage where underlying forensics models require different approaches (e.g., machine learning predictions, statistical methods, digital signature, perceptual image hash). Multi-type sensor data correlation and context awareness can improve the trust measurement, which is absent in that study’s model. To address these issues, novel techniques are introduced to accurately estimate the trustworthiness of IoT image sensor data with the aid of complementary non-imagery (numeric) data-generating sensors monitoring the same environment. The trust estimation models run in edge devices, relieving sensors from computationally intensive tasks. First, to detect local image forgery (splicing and copy-move attacks), an innovative image forgery detection method is proposed based on Discrete Cosine Transformation (DCT), Local Binary Pattern (LBP) and a new feature extraction method using the mean operator. Using Support Vector Machine (SVM), the proposed method is extensively tested on four well-known publicly available greyscale and colour image forgery datasets and on an IoT-based image forgery dataset that we built. Experimental results reveal the superiority of our proposed method over recent state-of-the-art methods in terms of widely used performance metrics and computational time and demonstrate robustness against low availability of forged training samples. Second, a robust trust estimation framework for IoT image data is proposed, leveraging numeric data-generating sensors deployed in the same area of interest (AoI) in an indoor environment. As low-cost sensors allow many IoT applications to use multiple types of sensors to observe the same AoI, the complementary numeric data of one sensor can be exploited to measure the trust value of another image sensor’s data. A theoretical model is developed using Shannon’s entropy to derive the uncertainty associated with an observed event and Dempster-Shafer theory (DST) for decision fusion. The proposed model’s efficacy in estimating the trust score of image sensor data is analysed by observing a fire event using IoT image and temperature sensor data in an indoor residential setup under different scenarios. The proposed model produces highly accurate trust scores in all scenarios with authentic and forged image data. Finally, as the outdoor environment varies dynamically due to different natural factors (e.g., lighting condition variations in day and night, presence of different objects, smoke, fog, rain, shadow in the scene), a novel trust framework is proposed that is suitable for the outdoor environments with these contextual variations. A transfer learning approach is adopted to derive the decision about an observation from image sensor data, while also a statistical approach is used to derive the decision about the same observation from numeric data generated from other sensors deployed in the same AoI. These decisions are then fused using CertainLogic and compared with DST-based fusion. A testbed was set up using Raspberry Pi microprocessor, image sensor, temperature sensor, edge device, LoRa nodes, LoRaWAN gateway and servers to evaluate the proposed techniques. The results show that CertainLogic is more suitable for measuring the trustworthiness of image sensor data in an outdoor environment.Doctor of Philosoph

Perceptual quality assessment and processing for visual signals.

視覺信號，包括圖像，視頻等，在采集，壓縮，存儲，傳輸，重新生成的過程中都會被各種各樣的噪聲所影響，因此他們的主觀質量也就會降低。所以，主觀視覺質量在現今的視覺信號處理跟通訊系統中起到了很大的作用。這篇畢業論文主要討論質量評價的算法設計，以及這些衡量標準在視覺信號處理上的應用。這篇論文的工作主要包括以下五個方面。第一部分主要集中在具有完全套考原始圖像的圖像質量評價。首先我們研究人類視覺系統的特征。具體說來，視覺在結構化失真上面的水平特性和顯著特征會被建模然后應用到結構相似度(SSIM)這個衡量標準上。實驗顯示我們的方法明顯的提高了衡量標準典主觀評價的相似度。由這個質量衡量標準的啟發，我們設計了一個主觀圖像壓縮的方法。其中我們提出了一個自適應的塊大小的超分辨率算法指導的下采樣的算法。實驗結果證明提出的圖像壓縮算法無論在主觀還是在客觀層面都構建了高質量的圖像。第二個部分的工作主要討論具有完全參考原始視頻的視頻質量評價。考慮到人類視覺系統的特征，比如時空域的對此敏感函數，眼球的移動，紋理的遮掩特性，空間域的一致性，時間域的協調性，不同塊變換的特性，我們設計了一個自適應塊大小的失真閾值的模型。實驗證明，我們提出的失真閾值模型能夠更精確的描迷人類視覺系統的特性。基于這個自適應塊大小的失真閾值模型，我們設計了一個簡單的主觀質量評價標準。在公共的圓像以及視頻的主觀數據庫上的測試結果證明了這個簡單的評價標準的有效性。因此，我們把這個簡單的質量標準應用于視頻編碼系統中。它可以在同樣的碼率下提供更高主觀質量的視頻。第三部分我們討論具有部分參考信息的圖像質量評價。我們通過描迷重組后的離散余弦變換域的系數的統計分布來衡量圖像的主觀質量。提出的評價標準發掘了相鄰的離散余弦系數的相同統計特性，相鄰的重組離散余弦系數的互信息，以及圖像的能量在不同頻率下的分布。實驗結果證明我們提出的質量標準河以超越其他的具有部分參考信息的質量評價標準，甚至還超過了具有完全參考信息的質量評價標準。而且，提取的特征很容易被編碼以及隱藏到圖像中以便于在圖像通訊中進行質量監控。第四部分我們討論具有部分參考信息的視頻質量評價。我們提取的特征可以很好的描迷空間域的信息失，和時間域的相鄰兩幀間的直方圖的統計特性。在視頻主觀質量的數據庫上的實驗結果，也證明了提出的方法河以超越其他代表性的視頻質量評價標準，甚至是具有完全參考信息的質量評價標準， 譬如PSNR以及SSIM 。我們的方法只需要很少的特征來描迷每一幀視頻圖像。對于每一幀圖像，一個特征用于描迷空間域的特點，另外三個特征用于描述時間域的特點。考慮到計算的復雜度以及壓縮特征所需要的碼率，提出的方法河以很簡單的在視頻的傳輸過程中監控視頻的質量。之前的四部分提到的主觀質量評價標準主要集中在傳統的失真上面， 譬如JPEG 圖像壓縮， H.264視頻壓縮。在最后一部分，我們討論在圖像跟視頻的retargeting過程中的失真。現如今，隨著消費者電子的發展，視覺信號需要在不同分辨率的顯示設備上進行通訊交互。因此， retargeting的算法把同一個原始圖像適應于不同的分辨率的顯示設備。這樣的過程就會引入圖像的失真。我們研究了對于retargeting圖像主觀質量的測試者的分數，從三個方面進行討論測試者對于retargeting圖像失真的反應.圖像retargeting的尺度，圖像retargeting的算法，原始圖像的內容特性。通過大量的主觀實驗測試，我們構建了一個關于圖像retargeting的主觀數據庫。基于這個主觀數據庫，我們評價以及分析了幾個具有代表性的質量評價標準。Visual signals, including images, videos, etc., are affected by a wide variety of distortions during acquisition, compression, storage, processing, transmission, and reproduction processes, which result in perceptual quality degradation. As a result, perceptual quality assessment plays a very important role in today's visual signal processing and communication systems. In this thesis, quality assessment algorithms for evaluating the visual signal perceptual quality, as well as the applications on visual signal processing and communications, are investigated. The work consists of five parts as briefly summarized below.The first part focuses on the full-reference (FR) image quality assessment. The properties of the human visual system (HVS) are firstly investigated. Specifically, the visual horizontal effect (HE) and saliency properties over the structural distortions are modelled and incorporated into the structure similarity index (SSIM). Experimental results show significantly improved performance in matching the subjective ratings. Inspired by the developed FR image metric, a perceptual image compression scheme is developed, where the adaptive block-based super-resolution directed down-sampling is proposed. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed image compression scheme can produce higher quality images in terms of both objective and subjective qualities, compared with the existing methods.The second part concerns the FR video quality assessment. The adaptive block-size transform (ABT) based just-noticeable difference (JND) for visual signals is investigated by considering the HVS characteristics, e.g., spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity function (CSF), eye movement, texture masking, spatial coherence, temporal consistency, properties of different block-size transforms, etc. It is verified that the developed ABT based JND can more accurately depict the HVS property, compared with the state-of-the-art JND models. The ABT based JND is thereby utilized to develop a simple perceptual quality metric for visual signals. Validations on the image and video subjective quality databases proved its effectiveness. As a result, the developed perceptual quality metric is employed for perceptual video coding, which can deliver video sequences of higher perceptual quality at the same bit-rates.The third part discusses the reduced-reference (RR) image quality assessment, which is developed by statistically modelling the coe cient distribution in the reorganized discrete cosine transform (RDCT) domain. The proposed RR metric exploits the identical statistical nature of the adjacent DCT coefficients, the mutual information (MI) relationship between adjacent RDCT coefficients, and the image energy distribution among different frequency components. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed metric outperforms the representative RR image quality metrics, and even the FR quality metric, i.e., peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR). Furthermore, the extracted RR features can be easily encoded and embedded into the distorted images for quality monitoring during image communications.The fourth part investigates the RR video quality assessment. The RR features are extracted to exploit the spatial information loss and the temporal statistical characteristics of the inter-frame histogram. Evaluations on the video subjective quality databases demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the representative RR video quality metrics, and even the FR metrics, such as PSNR, SSIM in matching the subjective ratings. Furthermore, only a small number of RR features is required to represent the original video sequence (each frame requires only 1 and 3 parameters to depict the spatial and temporal characteristics, respectively). By considering the computational complexity and the bit-rates for extracting and representing the RR features, the proposed RR quality metric can be utilized for quality monitoring during video transmissions, where the RR features for perceptual quality analysis can be easily embedded into the videos or transmitted through an ancillary data channel.The aforementioned perceptual quality metrics focus on the traditional distortions, such as JPEG image compression noise, H.264 video compression noise, and so on. In the last part, we investigate the distortions introduced during the image and video retargeting process. Nowadays, with the development of the consumer electronics, more and more visual signals have to communicate between different display devices of different resolutions. The retargeting algorithm is employed to adapt a source image of one resolution to be displayed in a device of a different resolution, which may introduce distortions during the retargeting process. We investigate the subjective responses on the perceptual qualities of the retargeted images, and discuss the subjective results from three perspectives, i.e., retargeting scales, retargeting methods, and source image content attributes. An image retargeting subjective quality database is built by performing a large-scale subjective study of image retargeting quality on a collection of retargeted images. Based on the built database, several representative quality metrics for retargeted images are evaluated and discussed.Detailed summary in vernacular field only.Detailed summary in vernacular field only.Detailed summary in vernacular field only.Detailed summary in vernacular field only.Detailed summary in vernacular field only.Detailed summary in vernacular field only.Ma, Lin."December 2012."Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2013.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 185-197).Abstract also in Chinese.Dedication --- p.iiAcknowledgments --- p.iiiAbstract --- p.viiiPublications --- p.xiNomenclature --- p.xviiContents --- p.xxivList of Figures --- p.xxviiiList of Tables --- p.xxxChapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1Chapter 1.1 --- Motivation and Objectives --- p.1Chapter 1.2 --- Subjective Perceptual Quality Assessment --- p.5Chapter 1.3 --- Objective Perceptual Quality Assessment --- p.10Chapter 1.3.1 --- Visual Modelling Approach --- p.10Chapter 1.3.2 --- Engineering Modelling Approach --- p.15Chapter 1.3.3 --- Perceptual Subjective Quality Databases --- p.19Chapter 1.3.4 --- Performance Evaluation --- p.21Chapter 1.4 --- Thesis Contributions --- p.22Chapter 1.5 --- Organization of the Thesis --- p.24Chapter I --- Full Reference Quality Assessment --- p.26Chapter 2 --- Full Reference Image Quality Assessment --- p.27Chapter 2.1 --- Visual Horizontal Effect for Image Quality Assessment --- p.27Chapter 2.1.1 --- Introduction --- p.27Chapter 2.1.2 --- Proposed Image Quality Assessment Framework --- p.28Chapter 2.1.3 --- Experimental Results --- p.34Chapter 2.1.4 --- Conclusion --- p.36Chapter 2.2 --- Image Compression via Adaptive Block-Based Super-Resolution Directed Down-Sampling --- p.37Chapter 2.2.1 --- Introduction --- p.37Chapter 2.2.2 --- The Proposed Image Compression Framework --- p.38Chapter 2.2.3 --- Experimental Results --- p.42Chapter 2.2.4 --- Conclusion --- p.45Chapter 3 --- Full Reference Video Quality Assessment --- p.46Chapter 3.1 --- Adaptive Block-size Transform based Just-Noticeable Dfference Model for Visual Signals --- p.46Chapter 3.1.1 --- Introduction --- p.46Chapter 3.1.2 --- JND Model based on Transforms of Different Block Sizes --- p.48Chapter 3.1.3 --- Selection Strategy Between Transforms of Different Block Sizes --- p.53Chapter 3.1.4 --- JND Model Evaluation --- p.56Chapter 3.1.5 --- Conclusion --- p.60Chapter 3.2 --- Perceptual Quality Assessment --- p.60Chapter 3.2.1 --- Experimental Results --- p.62Chapter 3.2.2 --- Conclusion --- p.64Chapter 3.3 --- Motion Trajectory Based Visual Saliency for Video Quality Assessment --- p.65Chapter 3.3.1 --- Motion Trajectory based Visual Saliency for VQA --- p.66Chapter 3.3.2 --- New Quaternion Representation (QR) for Each frame --- p.66Chapter 3.3.3 --- Saliency Map Construction by QR --- p.67Chapter 3.3.4 --- Incorporating Visual Saliency with VQAs --- p.68Chapter 3.3.5 --- Experimental Results --- p.69Chapter 3.3.6 --- Conclusion --- p.72Chapter 3.4 --- Perceptual Video Coding --- p.72Chapter 3.4.1 --- Experimental Results --- p.75Chapter 3.4.2 --- Conclusion --- p.76Chapter II --- Reduced Reference Quality Assessment --- p.77Chapter 4 --- Reduced Reference Image Quality Assessment --- p.78Chapter 4.1 --- Introduction --- p.78Chapter 4.2 --- Reorganization Strategy of DCT Coefficients --- p.81Chapter 4.3 --- Relationship Analysis of Intra and Inter RDCT subbands --- p.83Chapter 4.4 --- Reduced Reference Feature Extraction in Sender Side --- p.88Chapter 4.4.1 --- Intra RDCT Subband Modeling --- p.89Chapter 4.4.2 --- Inter RDCT Subband Modeling --- p.91Chapter 4.4.3 --- Image Frequency Feature --- p.92Chapter 4.5 --- Perceptual Quality Analysis in the Receiver Side --- p.95Chapter 4.5.1 --- Intra RDCT Feature Difference Analysis --- p.95Chapter 4.5.2 --- Inter RDCT Feature Difference Analysis --- p.96Chapter 4.5.3 --- Image Frequency Feature Difference Analysis --- p.96Chapter 4.6 --- Experimental Results --- p.98Chapter 4.6.1 --- Efficiency of the DCT Reorganization Strategy --- p.98Chapter 4.6.2 --- Performance of the Proposed RR IQA --- p.99Chapter 4.6.3 --- Performance of the Proposed RR IQA over Each Individual Distortion Type --- p.105Chapter 4.6.4 --- Statistical Significance --- p.107Chapter 4.6.5 --- Performance Analysis of Each Component --- p.109Chapter 4.7 --- Conclusion --- p.111Chapter 5 --- Reduced Reference Video Quality Assessment --- p.113Chapter 5.1 --- Introduction --- p.113Chapter 5.2 --- Proposed Reduced Reference Video Quality Metric --- p.114Chapter 5.2.1 --- Reduced Reference Feature Extraction from Spatial Perspective --- p.116Chapter 5.2.2 --- Reduced Reference Feature Extraction from Temporal Perspective --- p.118Chapter 5.2.3 --- Visual Quality Analysis in Receiver Side --- p.121Chapter 5.3 --- Experimental Results --- p.123Chapter 5.3.1 --- Consistency Test of the Proposed RR VQA over Compressed Video Sequences --- p.124Chapter 5.3.2 --- Consistency Test of the Proposed RR VQA over Video Sequences with Simulated Distortions --- p.126Chapter 5.3.3 --- Performance Evaluation of the Proposed RR VQA on Compressed Video Sequences --- p.129Chapter 5.3.4 --- Performance Evaluation of the Proposed RR VQA on Video Sequences Containing Transmission Distortions --- p.133Chapter 5.3.5 --- Performance Analysis of Each Component --- p.135Chapter 5.4 --- Conclusion --- p.137Chapter III --- Retargeted Visual Signal Quality Assessment --- p.138Chapter 6 --- Image Retargeting Perceptual Quality Assessment --- p.139Chapter 6.1 --- Introduction --- p.139Chapter 6.2 --- Preparation of Database Building --- p.142Chapter 6.2.1 --- Source Image --- p.142Chapter 6.2.2 --- Retargeting Methods --- p.143Chapter 6.2.3 --- Subjective Testing --- p.146Chapter 6.3 --- Data Processing and Analysis for the Database --- p.150Chapter 6.3.1 --- Processing of Subjective Ratings --- p.150Chapter 6.3.2 --- Analysis and Discussion of the Subjective Ratings --- p.153Chapter 6.4 --- Objective Quality Metric for Retargeted Images --- p.162Chapter 6.4.1 --- Quality Metric Performances on the Constructed Image Retargeting Database --- p.162Chapter 6.4.2 --- Subjective Analysis of the Shape Distortion and Content Information Loss --- p.165Chapter 6.4.3 --- Discussion --- p.167Chapter 6.5 --- Conclusion --- p.169Chapter 7 --- Conclusions --- p.170Chapter 7.1 --- Conclusion --- p.170Chapter 7.2 --- Future Work --- p.173Chapter A --- Attributes of the Source Image --- p.176Chapter B --- Retargeted Image Name and the Corresponding Number --- p.179Chapter C --- Source Image Name and the Corresponding Number --- p.183Bibliography --- p.18