59 research outputs found

    Building data management capabilities to address data protection regulations: Learnings from EU-GDPR

    Get PDF
    The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (EU-GDPR) has initiated a paradigm shift in data protection toward greater choice and sovereignty for individuals and more accountability for organizations. Its strict rules have inspired data protection regulations in other parts of the world. However, many organizations are facing difficulty complying with the EU-GDPR: these new types of data protection regulations cannot be addressed by an adaptation of contractual frameworks, but require a fundamental reconceptualization of how companies store and process personal data on an enterprise-wide level. In this paper, we introduce the resource-based view as a theoretical lens to explain the lengthy trajectories towards compliance and argue that these regulations require companies to build dedicated, enterprise-wide data management capabilities. Following a design science research approach, we propose a theoretically and empirically grounded capability model for the EU-GDPR that integrates the interpretation of legal texts, findings from EU-GDPR-related publications, and practical insights from focus groups with experts from 22 companies and four EU-GDPR projects. Our study advances interdisciplinary research at the intersection between IS and law: First, the proposed capability model adds to the regulatory compliance management literature by connecting abstract compliance requirements to three groups of capabilities and the resources required for their implementation, and second, it provides an enterprise-wide perspective that integrates and extends the fragmented body of research on EU-GDPR. Practitioners may use the capability model to assess their current status and set up systematic approaches toward compliance with an increasing number of data protection regulations

    Value creation through strategic social media use in HR management

    Get PDF
    The aim of this research is to understand how social media use is impacting communication processes within organisations. This study focuses on the HR communication process: traditionally, a one-way broadcast from management to employees with limited feedback mechanisms and limited employees’ participation in content creation. Social media, as a current IT phenomenon, penetrates personal, professional and political lives. One of the hallmarks of social media is its embedded democratisation: access, means, and ability to “speak” for everyone. Social media’s democratic approach to communication challenges established top-down organisational communications. This research analyses social media use in organisations to identify under which conditions social media use becomes strategic and leads to the development of new capabilities. The source data for the qualitative comparative case study is collected in a series of one-to-one and group interviews and is then analysed within the framework of three major theoretical lenses. First, the view of HRM as a communication system is used as a setting for the data analysis. Second, rhetorical practices for internal communications were used for describing how social media is used within HRM. Finally, Resource Based View is used as an explanatory lens for the impact and value of social media use in the intra- and inter-organisational communication process. The research has theoretical and practical implications. The findings challenge the top-down approach to organisational communications and show that democratised social media use can lead to improved relationships within organisations. Contingent on the purpose and the level of embeddedness in the business processes, social media use can lead to the development of capabilities, and thus become strategic. The practical implications stem from the recognition of the potential of social media to (1) establish new and unexpected relationships between employees and (2) support the emergence of new capabilities to combine and deploy human and information resources

    Bridging the Gap at Ecosystem Level : Enhancing Business Model Innovation in Internet of Things-Enabled Platform Ecosystems

    Get PDF
    Digitaalinen murros haastaa yrityksiĂ€ ja yhteisöjĂ€ tarjoamaan innovatiivisia palveluita asiakkailleen ja lisÀÀmÀÀn omaa kannattavuuttaan uusia liiketoimintamalleja luomalla. Esineiden internet (IoT) on tunnistettu potentiaaliseksi uudenlaisen arvon mahdollistajaksi. Odotetuista hyödyistĂ€ huolimatta onnistuneesti toteutettuja IoT:llĂ€ varustettuja alustaekosysteemejĂ€ on toistaiseksi vĂ€hĂ€n. IoT-tutkimus on pÀÀosin keskittynyt teknologisten edistysaskeleiden ottamiseen, kun taas liiketoimintamallien innovaatioiden merkitys on suurelta osin sivuutettu. On kuitenkin muistettava, ettĂ€ teknologian onnistunut kĂ€yttöönotto on suurelta osin kiinni hyvin mÀÀritellystĂ€ liiketoimintamallista ja sen arvolupauksen onnistuneisuudesta Sosiaalisen vaihdannan teoria (SET) on olennainen IoT:llĂ€ varustettujen alustaekosysteemien kontekstissa. Sen mukaan toimijoiden tulee kokea arvon vaihtaminen oikeudenmukaiseksi eli kokea saamansa arvo riittĂ€vĂ€ksi tekemiinsĂ€ panostuksiin nĂ€hden. TĂ€tĂ€ teoreettista viitekehystĂ€ hyödynnettiin tĂ€ssĂ€ tutkimuksessa selvitettĂ€essĂ€, miten digitaalisen murroksen aikoina liiketoimintamallien innovointia (BMI) voitaisiin parantaa IoT:llĂ€ varustetuissa alustaekosysteemeissĂ€. Siten toimijoiden pysyvyyttĂ€ voitaisiin parantaa ja verkostojen ulkoisvaikutuksia lisĂ€tĂ€. TĂ€mĂ€n tutkimuksen tulokset lisÀÀvĂ€t teoreettista ymmĂ€rrystĂ€ arvon vaihtamisesta IoT:tĂ€ hyödyntĂ€vien alustaekosysteemien kontekstissa. Tutkimuksessa tunnistettiin sosiaalisen arvon dimensiolle kaksi erilaista tulkintaa. Tutkimuksen perusteella voidaan myös todeta, etteivĂ€t teoriat – saati kĂ€ytĂ€nnön tekijĂ€t – huomioi ehdollista arvoa alustakontekstissa. Tutkimus tunnisti monitieteellisesti IoT:n ja alustaekosysteemien liiketoimintamalli-innovaatioiden luomiseen tarvittavat osat. LisĂ€ksi tutkimuksessa luotiin uusi malli BMI:lle, joka yhdistÀÀ kaksi uutta työkalua eli ekosysteemin arvotaseen ja alustakanvaasin. KĂ€yttĂ€mĂ€llĂ€ mallia iteratiivisesti strategisena työkaluna luodaan arvokasta nĂ€kemystĂ€ ekosysteemin toimijoille, minkĂ€ avulla he voivat luoda yhdessĂ€ yhteisen arvolupauksen ja mahdollistaa positiiviset verkostovaikutukset. LisĂ€ksi tĂ€mĂ€ tutkimus edistÀÀ tutkimusmenetelmiĂ€ esittĂ€mĂ€llĂ€ uuden tavan tarkentaa konseptien ominaisuuksia kirjallisuuskatsauksen avulla. Parannettu menetelmĂ€ on yhdistelmĂ€ lumipallomenetelmÀÀ, Porter sanarunkohaku-algoritmia ja temaattista analyysiĂ€. NĂ€itĂ€ hyödyntĂ€mĂ€llĂ€ voidaan luoda kattava ja strukturoitu synteesi oleellisesta kirjallisuudesta ja edistÀÀ monivivahteisempaa ja syvempÀÀ ymmĂ€rrystĂ€ tutkimusaiheesta. MenetelmÀÀ voidaan hyödyntÀÀ myös muilla tutkimusalueilla tĂ€smĂ€llisten kirjallisuuskatsausten tekemiseen. TĂ€mĂ€ tutkimus avaa vĂ€ylĂ€n arvolupausten arvioinnin tutkimiseen IoT:llĂ€ varustetuissa alustaekosysteemeissĂ€. LisÀÀ tutkimusta kuitenkin tarvitaan ennen kuin liiketoimintamahdollisuudet realisoituvat odotetusti. Ehdotettua mallia tulee tutkia vielĂ€ useammilla ja pidempikestoisilla tapaustutkimuksilla. LisĂ€ksi monialainen tutkimus voisi tunnistaa yhtĂ€lĂ€isyyksiĂ€ ja eroavaisuuksia IoT:llĂ€ varustettujen alustaekosysteemien haasteissa ja mahdollisuuksissa. LisĂ€ksi tulisi tutkia, miten uudet ja tulevat teknologiat vaikuttavat arvolupauksen muodostamiseen ja arvon tuottamiseen. TĂ€mĂ€n tutkimuksen tuloksissa korostetaan ekosysteemissĂ€ toimimisen vaatimaa kulttuurimuutosta. Perinteisesti yritykset ovat keskittyneet oman voittonsa maksimoimiseen, mutta ekosysteemeissĂ€ tulisi keskittyĂ€ koko ekosysteemin kokonaisarvon maksimoimiseen. TĂ€mĂ€n kulttuurimuutoksen tarvetta ja sitĂ€, miten muutos voitaisiin saada aikaan, tulisi tutkia lisÀÀ. Yhteenvetona voidaankin todeta, ettĂ€ tĂ€mĂ€ tutkimus edistÀÀ niin liiketoimintamallien innovoinnin teoriaa kuin kĂ€ytĂ€ntöjĂ€kin IoT:llĂ€ varustetuissa alustaekosysteemeissĂ€. Se tarjoaa BMI-mallin, joka rakentuu ekosysteemin arvotaseen ympĂ€rille. Se mahdollistaa ketterĂ€n mallin, jolla IoT:llĂ€ varustetun alustaekosysteemin toimijat voivat iteratiivisesti luoda ja kehittÀÀ arvolupaustaan. TĂ€mĂ€ tutkimus myös kirkastaa kĂ€sittelemiÀÀn konsepteja ja tarjoaa tuoreen lĂ€hestymistavan kirjallisuuskatsauksen tekemiseen. TĂ€mĂ€ tutkimus voi auttaa yrityksiĂ€ ja yhteisöjĂ€ ymmĂ€rtĂ€mÀÀn liiketoimintamallien innovoinnin merkityksen ja nĂ€in johtaa ne luomaan kestĂ€vĂ€mpiĂ€ ja kannattavampia ekosysteemejĂ€.Digital transformation is challenging businesses and societies to offer innovative services to customers and to increase profitability through the development of new business models. The Internet of Things (IoT) has been identified as a potent enabler for novel services and businesses. However, despite the potential benefits, successful implementation of IoT-enabled platform ecosystems remains scarce. Research on IoT has mainly focused on technological advancements, while the importance of business model innovation has been largely overlooked. The research in the field of IoT has predominantly focused on technological advancements, disregarding the critical aspect of business model innovation. However, successful implementation of technology largely relies on a well-defined business model that delivers outstanding value propositions. Social Exchange Theory (SET) is a theoretical framework that is pertinent in the context of IoT-enabled platform ecosystems. According to SET, actors in value exchange should find the distribution of value equitable vis-Ă -vis the effort invested in value creation. Therefore, in the present research, SET is adopted as a conceptual framework to explore how ecosystem-level business model innovation (BMI) in IoT-enabled platform ecosystems could be enhanced to increase actor retention, and to internalize network externalities to increase the positive network effects during times of digital transformation. The contribution of this research extends beyond the theoretical development of value exchange in the context of IoT-enabled platform ecosystems. This research identifies two different views of social value and recognizes that in the ecosystem context, conditional value is often overlooked in theoretical discussion and neglected by practitioners. This research also contributes to BMI theories in the IoT-enabled platform ecosystem context by identifying, in an interdisciplinary manner, the required building blocks, i.e., characteristics of a platform ecosystem BMI, and IoT. Further, a model for BMI is created, which combines two novel frameworks, namely, the Ecosystem Value Balance and the Platform Canvas. This provides ecosystem actors with valuable insights to co-create a joint value proposition and enable positive network effects by utilizing the model iteratively as a strategic tool. In addition, this research advances research methodologies by presenting a novel approach to clarifying concepts through literature reviews. The method involves a combination of snowballing, Porter stemming, and thematic analysis, which enables a comprehensive and structured synthesis of relevant literature and promotes a more nuanced and deeper understanding of the research topic. This approach can be applied in other research fields, too, to achieve more rigorous and accurate literature reviews. Although this research opens up avenues for researching value proposition evaluation in IoT-enabled ecosystems, more attention to the business opportunities that can be realized is necessary. The proposed model needs validation with more and longer-term cases, and a cross-industry study could explore potential similarities and differences in the challenges and opportunities of IoT platform ecosystems. Moreover, further research is required to validate the proposed model, explore potential similarities and differences in IoT platform ecosystems, and investigate the role of emerging technologies in shaping the value proposition and value creation processes. Further, the research emphasizes the need for cultural change in companies operating in ecosystems, as traditionally companies have focused on maximizing their profits instead of maximizing the overall value for the whole ecosystem. In conclusion, this research contributes to the theory and practice of business model innovation in IoT-enabled platform ecosystems by offering a BMI model which relies on value balance in ecosystem contexts and proposes a model for IoT platform ecosystem actors to co-create joint value propositions. It also clarifies related concepts and offers a novel approach to literature reviews. This research can help businesses and societies to understand the importance of business model innovation and to create a more sustainable and profitable ecosystem

    Exploring ‘People’ as the key element in enterprise architecture implementation: A Critical Realist Perspective

    Get PDF
    TOGAF (2009) describes the purpose of Enterprise Architecture (EA) is to optimise enterprisewide systems - the often-fragmented legacy of data processes (both manual and automated) - into an integrated environment that is responsive to change and supports the delivery of the business strategy (The Open Group Architecture Framework [TOGAF], 2009). However, for a number of reasons organisations still have difficulties establishing an effective EA (Raadt & Vliet, 2008; Gartner, 2009; and Janssen & Klievink, 2012, among others) and various reports suggest up to two thirds of implementations do not fulfil expectations (Roeleven, 2010). Being organisation wide with a strong governance element EA has significant social implications and social dependence, yet many implementations wrongly treat EA as solely a technical program. This thesis argues that the lack of focus on the ‘people’ element of EA could be the reason why many organisations still struggle with EA implementation. Recognising the importance of people in EA implementation requires acceptance of implementation as a social program, heavily influenced by the structural and cultural systems surrounding the architecture. In order to address the need for greater recognition of the role of people and the social aspects of EA implementation, this thesis adopts critical realism (CR) and its most recognised methodology, the morphogenetic approach (MA). Realism emphasises ontology and strongly argues that ontology, methodology and epistemology are closely linked – as Fleetwood (2005, p. 197) suggests, ontology matters: “The way we think the world is (ontology) influences: what we think can be known about it (epistemology); how we think it can be investigated (methodology and research techniques); the kinds of theories we think can be constructed about it; and the political and policy stances we are prepared to take”. In order to examine the social implications of technology implementation it makes sense to adopt a wellrecognized social theory like critical realism. This social realist approach proposes an analytical separation between structure, culture and agency (people) in order to examine their interactions over time. The MA suggests three important cycles – structural conditioning, social interaction and structural elaboration that provide a platform for examining possible change. Archer also importantly suggests that the emergent properties of collectivities and individuals differ. Such a model has clear value for examining the “people” acceptance of the new impositions and opportunities provided by the EA implementation. It acknowledges the sociocultural consequences of interactions between the structure and the culture to provide particular situational logics that direct, but do not determine the actions of people. The MA emphasises strongly the role of time in situation examination suggesting that structure and culture predate subsequent actions by involved agents. The thesis describes particular situational logics or mechanisms emanating from the interaction between structural and cultural systems that encourage particular behaviours in response to the EA program. These actions are then further examined in the sequence of MA cycles. Since mechanisms are only effective if people adopt them or not, another important element in this study is the part played by “reflexivity”. Reflexivity highlights the linkage between people concerns, projects and practices as people act in order to promote their concerns, and form projects to advance or to protect what they care about most. Reflexivity is an important mechanism for explaining how people’s ultimate concerns impact on their approach to the impositions of EA. An Australian university implementing EA (termed UX for anonymity) has been used as a case study in this research – this fortuitous timing allowed a careful and detailed examination of implementation over a 3-year period from initial rollout to ultimate acceptance. The study describes the challenging environment of university implementation where “academic freedom” is paramount and individual and group autonomies are threatened by EA – the study presents the important mechanisms and situational logics that direct people’s actions within the complex social context of a university. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were used as the primary method of data collection across UX stakeholders. A range of interviews were held throughout the study period with the university IT Governance Committee, the University Architecture Board, the CIO, and the Enterprise Business Group, as well as individual end-users such as teaching staff, researchers, students, and administrative staff of the faculties, schools and service centres. The MA provided a basic structure for unravelling the social complexity and helped guide the interview questions to identify the generative mechanisms hidden in the real domain, and to highlight the conditions that encourage individual and collective acceptance of EA practices. The reflexivity indicator developed by Archer –ICONI– is used throughout to explain how personal projects are formed and how they mediate the exercise of structural/cultural constraints and enablement within EA implementation. Passive participation in regular EA implementation meetings at UX was also important and useful to unearth possible perceived causal possibilities emanating from within the program itself and evident within the social context of implementation. Underpinned by a critical realist perspective, the thesis demonstrates that the MA is a powerful analytical tool to uncover the hidden mechanisms (the situational logics of structures and cultures) and social responses that enable success of EA implementation. The research examines the particular situational logics evident within the University under study and how these provide opportunities and constraints to the acceptance of EA over time. Equally important was reflexivity theory in attaining knowledge and understanding about what it is about people’s internal relations that makes EA implementation succeed. This thesis offers organisations a means to focus on the deeper issues of EA implementation programs by understanding the social complexity surrounding the architecture. The recognition of people as a key element in EA implementation provides a useful explanation of how the key stakeholders (and their power, influence and interests) may constrain and enable EA implementation. By including reflexivity as an important mechanism, organisations will be in a better position to understand the role of people and their interactions with preexisting structures and cultures operating over different time periods – reflexivity suggesting that “people” always have the possibility to do otherwise than expected, largely dependent on their personal history and their current personal projects and ultimate concerns
    • 

    corecore