6,745 research outputs found
Two-variable first order logic with modular predicates over words
We consider first order formulae over the signature consisting of the symbols of the alphabet, the symbol < (interpreted as a linear order) and the set MOD of modular numerical predicates. We study the expressive power of FO 2 [<, MOD], the two-variable first order logic over this signature, interpreted over finite words. We give an algebraic characterization of the corresponding regular languages in terms of their syntactic morphisms and we also give simple unambiguous regular expressions for them. It follows that one can decide whether a given regular language is captured by FO 2 [<, MOD]. Our proofs rely on a combination of arguments from semigroup theory (stamps), model theory (Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games) and combinatorics
Adding modular predicates to first-order fragments
We investigate the decidability of the definability problem for fragments of
first order logic over finite words enriched with modular predicates. Our
approach aims toward the most generic statements that we could achieve, which
successfully covers the quantifier alternation hierarchy of first order logic
and some of its fragments. We obtain that deciding this problem for each level
of the alternation hierarchy of both first order logic and its two-variable
fragment when equipped with all regular numerical predicates is not harder than
deciding it for the corresponding level equipped with only the linear order and
the successor. For two-variable fragments we also treat the case of the
signature containing only the order and modular predicates.Relying on some
recent results, this proves the decidability for each level of the alternation
hierarchy of the two-variable first order fragmentwhile in the case of the
first order logic the question remains open for levels greater than two.The
main ingredients of the proofs are syntactic transformations of first order
formulas as well as the algebraic framework of finite categories
One Quantifier Alternation in First-Order Logic with Modular Predicates
Adding modular predicates yields a generalization of first-order logic FO
over words. The expressive power of FO[<,MOD] with order comparison and
predicates for has been investigated by Barrington,
Compton, Straubing and Therien. The study of FO[<,MOD]-fragments was initiated
by Chaubard, Pin and Straubing. More recently, Dartois and Paperman showed that
definability in the two-variable fragment FO2[<,MOD] is decidable. In this
paper we continue this line of work.
We give an effective algebraic characterization of the word languages in
Sigma2[<,MOD]. The fragment Sigma2 consists of first-order formulas in prenex
normal form with two blocks of quantifiers starting with an existential block.
In addition we show that Delta2[<,MOD], the largest subclass of Sigma2[<,MOD]
which is closed under negation, has the same expressive power as two-variable
logic FO2[<,MOD]. This generalizes the result FO2[<] = Delta2[<] of Therien and
Wilke to modular predicates. As a byproduct, we obtain another decidable
characterization of FO2[<,MOD]
Covering and separation for logical fragments with modular predicates
For every class of word languages, one may associate a decision
problem called -separation. Given two regular languages, it asks
whether there exists a third language in containing the first
language, while being disjoint from the second one. Usually, finding an
algorithm deciding -separation yields a deep insight on
.
We consider classes defined by fragments of first-order logic. Given such a
fragment, one may often build a larger class by adding more predicates to its
signature. In the paper, we investigate the operation of enriching signatures
with modular predicates. Our main theorem is a generic transfer result for this
construction. Informally, we show that when a logical fragment is equipped with
a signature containing the successor predicate, separation for the stronger
logic enriched with modular predicates reduces to separation for the original
logic. This result actually applies to a more general decision problem, called
the covering problem
Logic Meets Algebra: the Case of Regular Languages
The study of finite automata and regular languages is a privileged meeting
point of algebra and logic. Since the work of Buchi, regular languages have
been classified according to their descriptive complexity, i.e. the type of
logical formalism required to define them. The algebraic point of view on
automata is an essential complement of this classification: by providing
alternative, algebraic characterizations for the classes, it often yields the
only opportunity for the design of algorithms that decide expressibility in
some logical fragment.
We survey the existing results relating the expressibility of regular
languages in logical fragments of MSO[S] with algebraic properties of their
minimal automata. In particular, we show that many of the best known results in
this area share the same underlying mechanics and rely on a very strong
relation between logical substitutions and block-products of pseudovarieties of
monoid. We also explain the impact of these connections on circuit complexity
theory.Comment: 37 page
Monadic Second-Order Logic with Arbitrary Monadic Predicates
We study Monadic Second-Order Logic (MSO) over finite words, extended with
(non-uniform arbitrary) monadic predicates. We show that it defines a class of
languages that has algebraic, automata-theoretic and machine-independent
characterizations. We consider the regularity question: given a language in
this class, when is it regular? To answer this, we show a substitution property
and the existence of a syntactical predicate.
We give three applications. The first two are to give very simple proofs that
the Straubing Conjecture holds for all fragments of MSO with monadic
predicates, and that the Crane Beach Conjecture holds for MSO with monadic
predicates. The third is to show that it is decidable whether a language
defined by an MSO formula with morphic predicates is regular.Comment: Conference version: MFCS'14, Mathematical Foundations of Computer
Science Journal version: ToCL'17, Transactions on Computational Logi
The ciao modular, standalone compiler and its generic program processing library
Ciao Prolog incorporates a module system which allows sepárate compilation and sensible creation of standalone executables. We describe some of the main aspects of the Ciao modular compiler, ciaoc, which takes advantage of the characteristics of the Ciao Prolog module system to automatically perform sepárate and incremental compilation and efficiently build small, standalone executables with competitive run-time performance, ciaoc can also detect statically a larger number of programming errors. We also present a generic code processing library for handling modular programs, which provides an important part of the functionality of ciaoc. This library allows the development of program analysis and transformation tools in a way that is to some extent orthogonal to the details of module system design, and has been used in the implementation of ciaoc and other Ciao system tools. We also describe the different types of executables which can be generated by the
Ciao compiler, which offer different tradeoffs between executable size, startup time, and portability, depending, among other factors, on the linking regime used (static, dynamic, lazy, etc.). Finally, we provide experimental data which illustrate these tradeoffs
On the logical definability of certain graph and poset languages
We show that it is equivalent, for certain sets of finite graphs, to be
definable in CMS (counting monadic second-order logic, a natural extension of
monadic second-order logic), and to be recognizable in an algebraic framework
induced by the notion of modular decomposition of a finite graph. More
precisely, we consider the set of composition operations on graphs
which occur in the modular decomposition of finite graphs. If is a subset
of , we say that a graph is an \calF-graph if it can be
decomposed using only operations in . A set of -graphs is recognizable if
it is a union of classes in a finite-index equivalence relation which is
preserved by the operations in . We show that if is finite and its
elements enjoy only a limited amount of commutativity -- a property which we
call weak rigidity, then recognizability is equivalent to CMS-definability.
This requirement is weak enough to be satisfied whenever all -graphs are
posets, that is, transitive dags. In particular, our result generalizes Kuske's
recent result on series-parallel poset languages
- …