2,409 research outputs found
Modal Linear Logic in Higher Order Logic, an experiment in Coq
The sequent calculus of classical modal linear logic KDT 4lin is coded in the higher order logic using the proof assistant COQ. The encoding has been done using two-level meta reasoning in Coq. KDT 4lin has been encoded as an object logic by inductively defining the set of modal linear logic formulas, the sequent relation on lists of these formulas, and some lemmas to work with lists.This modal linear logic has been argued to be a good candidate for epistemic applications. As examples some epistemic problems have been coded and proven in our encoding in Coq::the problem of logical omniscience and an epistemic puzzle: ’King, three wise men and five hats’
Tactics for Reasoning modulo AC in Coq
We present a set of tools for rewriting modulo associativity and
commutativity (AC) in Coq, solving a long-standing practical problem. We use
two building blocks: first, an extensible reflexive decision procedure for
equality modulo AC; second, an OCaml plug-in for pattern matching modulo AC. We
handle associative only operations, neutral elements, uninterpreted function
symbols, and user-defined equivalence relations. By relying on type-classes for
the reification phase, we can infer these properties automatically, so that
end-users do not need to specify which operation is A or AC, or which constant
is a neutral element.Comment: 16
Implementing and reasoning about hash-consed data structures in Coq
We report on four different approaches to implementing hash-consing in Coq
programs. The use cases include execution inside Coq, or execution of the
extracted OCaml code. We explore the different trade-offs between faithful use
of pristine extracted code, and code that is fine-tuned to make use of OCaml
programming constructs not available in Coq. We discuss the possible
consequences in terms of performances and guarantees. We use the running
example of binary decision diagrams and then demonstrate the generality of our
solutions by applying them to other examples of hash-consed data structures
Meta-F*: Proof Automation with SMT, Tactics, and Metaprograms
We introduce Meta-F*, a tactics and metaprogramming framework for the F*
program verifier. The main novelty of Meta-F* is allowing the use of tactics
and metaprogramming to discharge assertions not solvable by SMT, or to just
simplify them into well-behaved SMT fragments. Plus, Meta-F* can be used to
generate verified code automatically.
Meta-F* is implemented as an F* effect, which, given the powerful effect
system of F*, heavily increases code reuse and even enables the lightweight
verification of metaprograms. Metaprograms can be either interpreted, or
compiled to efficient native code that can be dynamically loaded into the F*
type-checker and can interoperate with interpreted code. Evaluation on
realistic case studies shows that Meta-F* provides substantial gains in proof
development, efficiency, and robustness.Comment: Full version of ESOP'19 pape
An Open Challenge Problem Repository for Systems Supporting Binders
A variety of logical frameworks support the use of higher-order abstract
syntax in representing formal systems; however, each system has its own set of
benchmarks. Even worse, general proof assistants that provide special libraries
for dealing with binders offer a very limited evaluation of such libraries, and
the examples given often do not exercise and stress-test key aspects that arise
in the presence of binders. In this paper we design an open repository ORBI
(Open challenge problem Repository for systems supporting reasoning with
BInders). We believe the field of reasoning about languages with binders has
matured, and a common set of benchmarks provides an important basis for
evaluation and qualitative comparison of different systems and libraries that
support binders, and it will help to advance the field.Comment: In Proceedings LFMTP 2015, arXiv:1507.0759
Syntax for free: representing syntax with binding using parametricity
We show that, in a parametric model of polymorphism, the type ∀ α. ((α → α) → α) → (α → α → α) → α is isomorphic to closed de Bruijn terms. That is, the type of closed higher-order abstract syntax terms is isomorphic to a concrete representation. To demonstrate the proof we have constructed a model of parametric polymorphism inside the Coq proof assistant. The proof of the theorem requires parametricity over Kripke relations. We also investigate some variants of this representation
- …