8,190 research outputs found

    Rainbow Connection Number and Connected Dominating Sets

    Full text link
    Rainbow connection number rc(G) of a connected graph G is the minimum number of colours needed to colour the edges of G, so that every pair of vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are coloured the same. In this paper we show that for every connected graph G, with minimum degree at least 2, the rainbow connection number is upper bounded by {\gamma}_c(G) + 2, where {\gamma}_c(G) is the connected domination number of G. Bounds of the form diameter(G) \leq rc(G) \leq diameter(G) + c, 1 \leq c \leq 4, for many special graph classes follow as easy corollaries from this result. This includes interval graphs, AT-free graphs, circular arc graphs, threshold graphs, and chain graphs all with minimum degree at least 2 and connected. We also show that every bridge-less chordal graph G has rc(G) \leq 3.radius(G). In most of these cases, we also demonstrate the tightness of the bounds. An extension of this idea to two-step dominating sets is used to show that for every connected graph on n vertices with minimum degree {\delta}, the rainbow connection number is upper bounded by 3n/({\delta} + 1) + 3. This solves an open problem of Schiermeyer (2009), improving the previously best known bound of 20n/{\delta} by Krivelevich and Yuster (2010). Moreover, this bound is seen to be tight up to additive factors by a construction of Caro et al. (2008).Comment: 14 page

    Uniquely D-colourable digraphs with large girth

    Full text link
    Let C and D be digraphs. A mapping f:V(D)→V(C)f:V(D)\to V(C) is a C-colouring if for every arc uvuv of D, either f(u)f(v)f(u)f(v) is an arc of C or f(u)=f(v)f(u)=f(v), and the preimage of every vertex of C induces an acyclic subdigraph in D. We say that D is C-colourable if it admits a C-colouring and that D is uniquely C-colourable if it is surjectively C-colourable and any two C-colourings of D differ by an automorphism of C. We prove that if a digraph D is not C-colourable, then there exist digraphs of arbitrarily large girth that are D-colourable but not C-colourable. Moreover, for every digraph D that is uniquely D-colourable, there exists a uniquely D-colourable digraph of arbitrarily large girth. In particular, this implies that for every rational number r≥1r\geq 1, there are uniquely circularly r-colourable digraphs with arbitrarily large girth.Comment: 21 pages, 0 figures To be published in Canadian Journal of Mathematic

    On the Complexity of Digraph Colourings and Vertex Arboricity

    Full text link
    It has been shown by Bokal et al. that deciding 2-colourability of digraphs is an NP-complete problem. This result was later on extended by Feder et al. to prove that deciding whether a digraph has a circular pp-colouring is NP-complete for all rational p>1p>1. In this paper, we consider the complexity of corresponding decision problems for related notions of fractional colourings for digraphs and graphs, including the star dichromatic number, the fractional dichromatic number and the circular vertex arboricity. We prove the following results: Deciding if the star dichromatic number of a digraph is at most pp is NP-complete for every rational p>1p>1. Deciding if the fractional dichromatic number of a digraph is at most pp is NP-complete for every p>1,p≠2p>1, p \neq 2. Deciding if the circular vertex arboricity of a graph is at most pp is NP-complete for every rational p>1p>1. To show these results, different techniques are required in each case. In order to prove the first result, we relate the star dichromatic number to a new notion of homomorphisms between digraphs, called circular homomorphisms, which might be of independent interest. We provide a classification of the computational complexities of the corresponding homomorphism colouring problems similar to the one derived by Feder et al. for acyclic homomorphisms.Comment: 21 pages, 1 figur
    • …
    corecore