136 research outputs found
Turing jumps through provability
Fixing some computably enumerable theory , the
Friedman-Goldfarb-Harrington (FGH) theorem says that over elementary
arithmetic, each formula is equivalent to some formula of the form
provided that is consistent. In this paper we give various
generalizations of the FGH theorem. In particular, for we relate
formulas to provability statements which
are a formalization of "provable in together with all true
sentences". As a corollary we conclude that each is
-complete. This observation yields us to consider a recursively
defined hierarchy of provability predicates which look a lot
like except that where calls upon the
oracle of all true sentences, the recursively
calls upon the oracle of all true sentences of the form . As such we obtain a `syntax-light' characterization of
definability whence of Turing jumps which is readily extended
beyond the finite. Moreover, we observe that the corresponding provability
predicates are well behaved in that together they provide a
sound interpretation of the polymodal provability logic
Turing-Taylor expansions for arithmetic theories
Turing progressions have been often used to measure the proof-theoretic
strength of mathematical theories. Turing progressions based on -provability
give rise to a proof-theoretic ordinal. As such, to each theory
we can assign the sequence of corresponding ordinals . We call this sequence a \emph{Turing-Taylor expansion} of
a theory.
In this paper, we relate Turing-Taylor expansions of sub-theories of Peano
Arithmetic to Ignatiev's universal model for the closed fragment of the
polymodal provability logic . In particular, in this
first draft we observe that each point in the Ignatiev model can be seen as
Turing-Taylor expansions of formal mathematical theories.
Moreover, each sub-theory of Peano Arithmetic that allows for a Turing-Taylor
expression will define a unique point in Ignatiev's model.Comment: First draf
Levelable Sets and the Algebraic Structure of Parameterizations
Asking which sets are fixed-parameter tractable for a given parameterization
constitutes much of the current research in parameterized complexity theory.
This approach faces some of the core difficulties in complexity theory. By
focussing instead on the parameterizations that make a given set
fixed-parameter tractable, we circumvent these difficulties. We isolate
parameterizations as independent measures of complexity and study their
underlying algebraic structure. Thus we are able to compare parameterizations,
which establishes a hierarchy of complexity that is much stronger than that
present in typical parameterized algorithms races. Among other results, we find
that no practically fixed-parameter tractable sets have optimal
parameterizations
Open questions about Ramsey-type statements in reverse mathematics
Ramsey's theorem states that for any coloring of the n-element subsets of N
with finitely many colors, there is an infinite set H such that all n-element
subsets of H have the same color. The strength of consequences of Ramsey's
theorem has been extensively studied in reverse mathematics and under various
reducibilities, namely, computable reducibility and uniform reducibility. Our
understanding of the combinatorics of Ramsey's theorem and its consequences has
been greatly improved over the past decades. In this paper, we state some
questions which naturally arose during this study. The inability to answer
those questions reveals some gaps in our understanding of the combinatorics of
Ramsey's theorem.Comment: 15 page
Restricted Positive Quantification Is Not Elementary
We show that a restricted variant of constructive predicate logic with positive (covariant) quantification is of super-elementary complexity. The restriction is to limit the number of eigenvariables used in quantifier introductions rules to a reasonably usable level. This construction suggests that the known non-elementary decision algorithms for positive logic may actually be best possible
- …