How to compare treebanks

Recent years have seen an increasing interest in developing standards for linguistic annotation, with a focus on the interoperability of the resources. This effort, however, requires a profound knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of linguistic annotation schemes in order to avoid importing the flaws and weaknesses of existing encoding schemes into the new standards. This paper addresses the question how to compare syntactically annotated corpora and gain insights into the usefulness of specific design decisions. We present an exhaustive evaluation of two German treebanks with crucially different encoding schemes. We evaluate three different parsers trained on the two treebanks and compare results using EVALB, the Leaf-Ancestor metric, and a dependency-based evaluation. Furthermore, we present TePaCoC, a new testsuite for the evaluation of parsers on complex German grammatical constructions. The testsuite provides a well thought-out error classification, which enables us to compare parser output for parsers trained on treebanks with different encoding schemes and provides interesting insights into the impact of treebank annotation schemes on specific constructions like PP attachment or non-constituent coordination

Parser evaluation across text types

When a statistical parser is trained on one treebank, one usually tests it on another portion of the same treebank, partly due to the fact that a comparable annotation format is needed for testing. But the user of a parser may not be interested in parsing sentences from the same newspaper all over, or even wants syntactic annotations for a slightly different text type. Gildea (2001) for instance found that a parser trained on the WSJ portion of the Penn Treebank performs less well on the Brown corpus (the subset that is available in the PTB bracketing format) than a parser that has been trained only on the Brown corpus, although the latter one has only half as many sentences as the former. Additionally, a parser trained on both the WSJ and Brown corpora performs less well on the Brown corpus than on the WSJ one. This leads us to the following questions that we would like to address in this paper: - Is there a difference in usefulness of techniques that are used to improve parser performance between the same-corpus and the different-corpus case? - Are different types of parsers (rule-based and statistical) equally sensitive to corpus variation? To achieve this, we compared the quality of the parses of a hand-crafted constraint-based parser and a statistical PCFG-based parser that was trained on a treebank of German newspaper text

Extracting spatial relations from document for geographic information retrieval

IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society (IEEE GRSS); East China Norm. Univ., Sch. Resour. Environ. Sci.; Shanghai Urban Dev. Inf. Res. Cent.; The Geographical Society of Shanghai; East China Univ. Sci. Technol., Bus. Sch.<span class="MedBlackText">Geographic information retrieval (GIR) is developed to retrieve geographical information from unstructured text (commonly web documents). Previous researches focus on applying traditional information retrieval (IR) techniques to GIR, such as ranking geographic relevance by vector space model (VSM). In many cases, these keyword-based methods can not support spatial query very well. For example, searching documents on &quot;debris flow took place in Hunan last year&quot;, the documents selected in this way may only contain the words &quot;debris flow&quot; and &quot;Hunan&quot; rather than refer to &quot;debris&quot; flow actually occurred in &quot;Hunan&quot;. Lack of spatial relations between thematic activates (debris flow) and geographic entities (Hunan) is the key reason for this problem. In this paper, we present a kernel-based approach and apply it in support vector machine (SVM) to extract spatial relations from free text for further GIS service and spatial reasoning. First, we analyze the characters of spatial relation expressions in natural language and there are two types of spatial relations: topology and direction. Both of them are used to qualitatively describe the relative positions of spatial objects to each other. Then we explore the use of dependency tree (a dependency tree represents the grammatical dependencies in a sentence and it can be generated by syntax parser) to identify these spatial relations. We observe that the features required to find a relationship between two spatial named entities in the same sentence is typically captured by the shortest path between the two entities in the dependency tree. Therefore, we construct a shortest path dependency kernel for SVM to complete the task. The experiment results show that our dependency tree kernel achieves significant improvement than previous method. </span

Non-projective Dependency-based Pre-Reordering with Recurrent Neural Network for Machine Translation

The quality of statistical machine translation performed with phrase based approaches can be increased by permuting the words in the source sentences in an order which resembles that of the target language. We propose a class of recurrent neural models which exploit source side dependency syntax features to reorder the words into a target-like order. We evaluate these models on the German-to-English language pair, showing significant improvements over a phrase-based Moses baseline, obtaining a quality similar or superior to that of hand-coded syntactical reordering rules

Is Supervised Syntactic Parsing Beneficial for Language Understanding? An Empirical Investigation

Traditional NLP has long held (supervised) syntactic parsing necessary for successful higher-level language understanding. The recent advent of end-to-end neural language learning, self-supervised via language modeling (LM), and its success on a wide range of language understanding tasks, however, questions this belief. In this work, we empirically investigate the usefulness of supervised parsing for semantic language understanding in the context of LM-pretrained transformer networks. Relying on the established fine-tuning paradigm, we first couple a pretrained transformer with a biaffine parsing head, aiming to infuse explicit syntactic knowledge from Universal Dependencies (UD) treebanks into the transformer. We then fine-tune the model for language understanding (LU) tasks and measure the effect of the intermediate parsing training (IPT) on downstream LU performance. Results from both monolingual English and zero-shot language transfer experiments (with intermediate target-language parsing) show that explicit formalized syntax, injected into transformers through intermediate supervised parsing, has very limited and inconsistent effect on downstream LU performance. Our results, coupled with our analysis of transformers' representation spaces before and after intermediate parsing, make a significant step towards providing answers to an essential question: how (un)availing is supervised parsing for high-level semantic language understanding in the era of large neural models

Syntax-based machine translation using dependency grammars and discriminative machine learning

Machine translation underwent huge improvements since the groundbreaking introduction of statistical methods in the early 2000s, going from very domain-specific systems that still performed relatively poorly despite the painstakingly crafting of thousands of ad-hoc rules, to general-purpose systems automatically trained on large collections of bilingual texts which manage to deliver understandable translations that convey the general meaning of the original input. These approaches however still perform quite below the level of human translators, typically failing to convey detailed meaning and register, and producing translations that, while readable, are often ungrammatical and unidiomatic. This quality gap, which is considerably large compared to most other natural language processing tasks, has been the focus of the research in recent years, with the development of increasingly sophisticated models that attempt to exploit the syntactical structure of human languages, leveraging the technology of statistical parsers, as well as advanced machine learning methods such as marging-based structured prediction algorithms and neural networks. The translation software itself became more complex in order to accommodate for the sophistication of these advanced models: the main translation engine (the decoder) is now often combined with a pre-processor which reorders the words of the source sentences to a target language word order, or with a post-processor that ranks and selects a translation according according to fine model from a list of candidate translations generated by a coarse model. In this thesis we investigate the statistical machine translation problem from various angles, focusing on translation from non-analytic languages whose syntax is best described by fluid non-projective dependency grammars rather than the relatively strict phrase-structure grammars or projectivedependency grammars which are most commonly used in the literature. We propose a framework for modeling word reordering phenomena between language pairs as transitions on non-projective source dependency parse graphs. We quantitatively characterize reordering phenomena for the German-to-English language pair as captured by this framework, specifically investigating the incidence and effects of the non-projectivity of source syntax and the non-locality of word movement w.r.t. the graph structure. We evaluated several variants of hand-coded pre-ordering rules in order to assess the impact of these phenomena on translation quality. We propose a class of dependency-based source pre-ordering approaches that reorder sentences based on a flexible models trained by SVMs and and several recurrent neural network architectures. We also propose a class of translation reranking models, both syntax-free and source dependency-based, which make use of a type of neural networks known as graph echo state networks which is highly flexible and requires extremely little training resources, overcoming one of the main limitations of neural network models for natural language processing tasks

Knowledge-enhanced neural grammar Induction

Natural language is usually presented as a word sequence, but the inherent structure of language is not necessarily sequential. Automatic grammar induction for natural language is a long-standing research topic in the field of computational linguistics and still remains an open problem today. From the perspective of cognitive science, the goal of a grammar induction system is to mimic children: learning a grammar that can generalize to infinitely many utterances by only consuming finite data. With regard to computational linguistics, an automatic grammar induction system could be beneficial for a wide variety of natural language processing (NLP) applications: providing syntactic analysis explicitly for a pipeline or a joint learning system; injecting structural bias implicitly into an end-to-end model. Typically, approaches to grammar induction only have access to raw text. Due to the huge search space of trees as well as data sparsity and ambiguity issues, grammar induction is a difficult problem. Thanks to the rapid development of neural networks and their capacity of over-parameterization and continuous representation learning, neural models have been recently introduced to grammar induction. Given its large capacity, introducing external knowledge into a neural system is an effective approach in practice, especially for an unsupervised problem. This thesis explores how to incorporate external knowledge into neural grammar induction models. We develop several approaches to combine different types of knowledge with neural grammar induction models on two grammar formalisms — constituency and dependency grammar. We first investigate how to inject symbolic knowledge, universal linguistic rules, into unsupervised dependency parsing. In contrast to previous state-of-the-art models that utilize time-consuming global inference, we propose a neural transition-based parser using variational inference. Our parser is able to employ rich features and supports inference in linear time for both training and testing. The core component in our parser is posterior regularization, where the posterior distribution of the dependency trees is constrained by the universal linguistic rules. The resulting parser outperforms previous unsupervised transition-based dependency parsers and achieves performance comparable to global inference-based models. Our parser also substantially increases parsing speed over global inference-based models. Recently, tree structures have been considered as latent variables that are learned through downstream NLP tasks, such as language modeling and natural language inference. More specifically, auxiliary syntax-aware components are embedded into the neural networks and are trained end-to-end on the downstream tasks. However, such latent tree models either struggle to produce linguistically plausible tree structures, or require an external biased parser to obtain good parsing performance. In the second part of this thesis, we focus on constituency structure and propose to use imitation learning to couple two heterogeneous latent tree models: we transfer the knowledge learned from a continuous latent tree model trained using language modeling to a discrete one, and further fine-tune the discrete model using a natural language inference objective. Through this two-stage training scheme, the discrete latent tree model achieves stateof-the-art unsupervised parsing performance. The transformer is a newly proposed neural model for NLP. Transformer-based pre-trained language models (PLMs) like BERT have achieved remarkable success on various NLP tasks by training on an enormous corpus using word prediction tasks. Recent studies show that PLMs can learn considerable syntactical knowledge in a syntaxagnostic manner. In the third part of this thesis, we leverage PLMs as a source of external knowledge. We propose a parameter-free approach to select syntax-sensitive self-attention heads from PLMs and perform chart-based unsupervised constituency parsing. In contrast to previous approaches, our head-selection approach only relies on raw text without any annotated development data. Experimental results on both English and eight other languages show that our approach achieves competitive performance

Treebank-based grammar acquisition for German

Manual development of deep linguistic resources is time-consuming and costly and therefore often described as a bottleneck for traditional rule-based NLP. In my PhD thesis I present a treebank-based method for the automatic acquisition of LFG resources for German. The method automatically creates deep and rich linguistic presentations from labelled data (treebanks) and can be applied to large data sets. My research is based on and substantially extends previous work on automatically acquiring wide-coverage, deep, constraint-based grammatical resources from the English Penn-II treebank (Cahill et al.,2002; Burke et al., 2004; Cahill, 2004). Best results for English show a dependency f-score of 82.73% (Cahill et al., 2008) against the PARC 700 dependency bank, outperforming the best hand-crafted grammar of Kaplan et al. (2004). Preliminary work has been carried out to test the approach on languages other than English, providing proof of concept for the applicability of the method (Cahill et al., 2003; Cahill, 2004; Cahill et al., 2005). While first results have been promising, a number of important research questions have been raised. The original approach presented first in Cahill et al. (2002) is strongly tailored to English and the datastructures provided by the Penn-II treebank (Marcus et al., 1993). English is configurational and rather poor in inflectional forms. German, by contrast, features semi-free word order and a much richer morphology. Furthermore, treebanks for German differ considerably from the Penn-II treebank as regards data structures and encoding schemes underlying the grammar acquisition task. In my thesis I examine the impact of language-specific properties of German as well as linguistically motivated treebank design decisions on PCFG parsing and LFG grammar acquisition. I present experiments investigating the influence of treebank design on PCFG parsing and show which type of representations are useful for the PCFG and LFG grammar acquisition tasks. Furthermore, I present a novel approach to cross-treebank comparison, measuring the effect of controlled error insertion on treebank trees and parser output from different treebanks. I complement the cross-treebank comparison by providing a human evaluation using TePaCoC, a new testsuite for testing parser performance on complex grammatical constructions. Manual evaluation on TePaCoC data provides new insights on the impact of flat vs. hierarchical annotation schemes on data-driven parsing. I present treebank-based LFG acquisition methodologies for two German treebanks. An extensive evaluation along different dimensions complements the investigation and provides valuable insights for the future development of treebanks