361 research outputs found

    Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data for the Assessment of Standing and Lying Deadwood: Current Situation and New Perspectives

    Get PDF
    LiDAR technology is finding uses in the forest sector, not only for surveys in producing forests but also as a tool to gain a deeper understanding of the importance of the three-dimensional component of forest environments. Developments of platforms and sensors in the last decades have highlighted the capacity of this technology to catch relevant details, even at finer scales. This drives its usage towards more ecological topics and applications for forest management. In recent years, nature protection policies have been focusing on deadwood as a key element for the health of forest ecosystems and wide-scale assessments are necessary for the planning process on a landscape scale. Initial studies showed promising results in the identification of bigger deadwood components (e.g., snags, logs, stumps), employing data not specifically collected for the purpose. Nevertheless, many efforts should still be made to transfer the available methodologies to an operational level. Newly available platforms (e.g., Mobile Laser Scanner) and sensors (e.g., Multispectral Laser Scanner) might provide new opportunities for this field of study in the near future

    Exploring Data Mining Techniques for Tree Species Classification Using Co-Registered LiDAR and Hyperspectral Data

    Full text link
    NASA Goddard’s LiDAR, Hyperspectral, and Thermal imager provides co-registered remote sensing data on experimental forests. Data mining methods were used to achieve a final tree species classification accuracy of 68% using a combined LiDAR and hyperspectral dataset, and show promise for addressing deforestation and carbon sequestration on a species-specific level

    Mapping Migratory Bird Prevalence Using Remote Sensing Data Fusion

    Get PDF
    This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the Public Library of Science and can be found at: http://www.plosone.org/home.action.Background: Improved maps of species distributions are important for effective management of wildlife under increasing anthropogenic pressures. Recent advances in lidar and radar remote sensing have shown considerable potential for mapping forest structure and habitat characteristics across landscapes. However, their relative efficacies and integrated use in habitat mapping remain largely unexplored. We evaluated the use of lidar, radar and multispectral remote sensing data in predicting multi-year bird detections or prevalence for 8 migratory songbird species in the unfragmented temperate deciduous forests of New Hampshire, USA. \ud \ud Methodology and Principal Findings: A set of 104 predictor variables describing vegetation vertical structure and variability from lidar, phenology from multispectral data and backscatter properties from radar data were derived. We tested the accuracies of these variables in predicting prevalence using Random Forests regression models. All data sets showed more than 30% predictive power with radar models having the lowest and multi-sensor synergy ("fusion") models having highest accuracies. Fusion explained between 54% and 75% variance in prevalence for all the birds considered. Stem density from discrete return lidar and phenology from multispectral data were among the best predictors. Further analysis revealed different relationships between the remote sensing metrics and bird prevalence. Spatial maps of prevalence were consistent with known habitat preferences for the bird species. \ud \ud Conclusion and Significance: Our results highlight the potential of integrating multiple remote sensing data sets using machine-learning methods to improve habitat mapping. Multi-dimensional habitat structure maps such as those generated from this study can significantly advance forest management and ecological research by facilitating fine-scale studies at both stand and landscape level

    Moniajalliset aaltomuotolaserpiirteet metsĂ€puissa – fenologian, puulajien ja skannausgeometrian vaikutus

    Get PDF
    Ilmalaserkeilauksella ”airborne LiDAR” (Light Detection and Ranging) tuotetaan korkearesoluutioista 3D-tietoa erittĂ€in kustannustehokkaasti. TĂ€mĂ€nhetkiset metsien inventointimenetelmĂ€t yhdistĂ€vĂ€t sekĂ€ LiDARin ettĂ€ passiivisen ilmakuvauksen. Mahdollisuus pelkĂ€n LiDARin kĂ€yttöön on erittĂ€in houkutteleva, koska se johtaisi ainakin osittain kustannusten alenemiseen. TĂ€ssĂ€ tutkimuksessa keskitytÀÀn ns. tĂ€yden aaltomuodon havaintoihin, mitkĂ€ sisĂ€ltĂ€vĂ€t enemmĂ€n tietoa lĂ€hetetystĂ€ ja vastaanotetusta signaalista kuin ’tavanomaiset’ pistepilvet. TĂ€ssĂ€ tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan metsĂ€n latvuston rakenteellisten ominaisuuksien ja LiDAR-signaalien vĂ€lisiĂ€ riippuvuuksia ja pyritÀÀn lisÀÀmÀÀn ymmĂ€rrystĂ€mme LiDARin ja kasvillisuuden vĂ€lisistĂ€ vuorovaikutuksista ja tekijöistĂ€, jotka rajoittavat nykyistĂ€ kykyĂ€ kĂ€yttÀÀ LiDAR-dataa mm. puulajitulkintaan, ja sitĂ€, kuinka erilaisin prosessointi ja laskentamenetelmin voimme parantaa LiDARin tulkintaa metsĂ€ssĂ€. TĂ€mĂ€n tutkimuksen tarkoituksena on ymmĂ€rtÀÀ, kuinka erilaisia aaltomuotopiirteitĂ€ voidaan tulkita ja kuinka piirteet kĂ€yttĂ€ytyvĂ€t muuttuvan fenologian mukaan. Tutkimusaineisto koostuu kolmesta perĂ€kkĂ€isestĂ€ LiDAR- ja ilmakuva kampanjasta, jotka on tehty alueella 38 kuukauden aikana sekĂ€ tĂ€mĂ€n ajanjakson aikana mitatuista maastoreferenssipuista. KĂ€ytössĂ€ on monen ajankohdan dataa, mikĂ€ koostuu kolmesta toistetusta laserkeilauksesta, jotka kaikki kĂ€yttivĂ€t samaa sensoria, lentoratoja ja keilausasetuksia. Koska LiDAR-havainnot ovat vertailukelpoisia ja samoista puista, voidaan ns. "puutekijÀÀ" tutkia ja vaihtelua aaltomuodon ominaisuuksien vĂ€lillĂ€ toistuvissa keilauksissa seurata. Fenologiset muutokset ovat havaittavissa, koska aineistot sisĂ€ltĂ€vĂ€t talven (lehdetön aika), alkukesĂ€n (alhainen lehtialaindeksi (LAI) havupuilla) ja loppukesĂ€n (tĂ€yslehti, korkea LAI). Myös skannauszeniittikulman (SZA) vaikutus aaltomuodon ominaisuuksiin ja piirteisiin otettiin huomioon, koska sama puu voitiin nĂ€hdĂ€ usealta lentolinjalta. Tulokset osoittavat, ettĂ€ huolellisella koeasettelulla on mahdollista havaita lajien sisĂ€isiĂ€ ja lajien vĂ€lisiĂ€ fenologisia eroja ja muutoksia moniajallisista aaltomuotopiirteistĂ€. SZA:lla ei ollut merkittĂ€vÀÀ vaikutusta tuloksiin. Puulajiluokitus onnistui hyvin vaihtelevissa fenologisissa olosuhteissa ja erirakenteellisissa metsiköissĂ€. Fenologiset muutokset olivat hyvin ilmeisiĂ€ kausivihannoilla puilla, mutta melko pieniĂ€ ainavihannilla havupuilla. Kokonaistarkkuudet puulajiluokituksessa olivat talvella 92 %, alkukesĂ€llĂ€ 88 % ja loppukesĂ€llĂ€ 84 % kasvatusmetsĂ€ssĂ€ ja talvella 84 %, alkukesĂ€llĂ€ 81 % ja loppukesĂ€llĂ€ 83 % vanhassa puustossa. "puutekijĂ€n" osoitettiin olevan merkittĂ€vĂ€. Lajien sisĂ€inen varianssi johtuu pÀÀasiassa puutekijĂ€stĂ€ eli lajinsisĂ€inen ominaisuusvarianssi edustaa luonnollista vaihtelua saman lajin puiden vĂ€lillĂ€.Airborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) produces high-resolution and cost-efficient 3D data. Currently, forest inventories combine the use of both LiDAR and passive imaging by cameras, and the possibility of using LiDAR only is very tempting as it would lead to cost reduction. Focus of this study is on the full-waveform observations that extent the information content compared to conventional point clouds and are somewhat rarer to have access to. This study explores basic dependencies between structural canopy features and LiDAR signals over time and aims at augmenting our understanding of LiDAR-vegetation interactions and factors limiting our current ability to use pulsed LiDAR data for species detection, and how possibilities to overcome those limitations. Motivation is to understand how different waveform features can be interpreted and how the features behave over time with changing vegetation phenology. The study material consists of three consecutive LiDAR campaigns and aerial imaging surveys done in the area during a 38-month period and field reference trees that have been measured during this period. I use multi-temporal data that comprise three repeated acquisitions, which all applied same sensor, trajectories, as well as sensor and acquisition settings. As I had repeated LiDAR observations of the same trees where the acquisition settings are comparable, I could study the so-called ‘tree effect’ and overall co-variation between waveform features in the repeated acquisitions. Phenological changes are available as the data comprises winter (leaf-off), early summer (low LAI in conifers) and late summer data (full leaf, high LAI). The influence of scan zenith angle (SZA) on waveform features and attributes is also considered, as the same tree can be seen from multiple strips. The results showed that by using careful experimentation it is possible to detect intra- and interspecies phenological changes from multitemporal full-waveform data, while SZA did not have markable effect on the WF features. I was also able to perform well with the tree species classification task in varying phenological conditions. The phenological changes were very apparent on deciduous trees, but rather small on evergreen conifers. In a 45-year-old stand, the overall accuracies in tree species classification were 92, 87 and 88 % for winter, early summer, and late summer, respectively. These figures were 84, 81, and 83 % for in an old growth forest. The ‘tree effect’ was shown to be significant, i.e., many of the WF features of trees were correlated over time. The intra-species feature variance that is due to the tree effect represents natural variation between trees of the same species

    MAPPING FOREST STRUCTURE AND HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS USING LIDAR AND MULTI-SENSOR FUSION

    Get PDF
    This dissertation explored the combined use of lidar and other remote sensing data for improved forest structure and habitat mapping. The objectives were to quantify aboveground biomass and canopy dynamics and map habitat characteristics with lidar and /or fusion approaches. Structural metrics from lidar and spectral characteristics from hyperspectral data were combined for improving biomass estimates in the Sierra Nevada, California. Addition of hyperspectral metrics only marginally improved biomass estimates from lidar, however, predictions from lidar after species stratification of field data improved by 12%. Spatial predictions from lidar after species stratification of hyperspectral data also had lower errors suggesting this could be viable method for mapping biomass at landscape level. A combined analysis of the two datasets further showed that fusion could have considerably more value in understanding ecosystem and habitat characteristics. The second objective was to quantify canopy height and biomass changes in in the Sierra Nevada using lidar data acquired in 1999 and 2008. Direct change detection showed overall statistically significant positive height change at footprint level (ΔRH100 = 0.69 m, +/- 7.94 m). Across the landscape, ~20 % of height and biomass changes were significant with more than 60% being positive, suggesting regeneration from past disturbances and a small net carbon sink. This study added further evidence to the capabilities of waveform lidar in mapping canopy dynamics while highlighting the need for error analysis and rigorous field validation Lastly, fusion applications for habitat mapping were tested with radar, lidar and multispectral data in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. A suite of metrics from each dataset was used to predict multi-year presence for eight migratory songbirds with data mining methods. Results showed that fusion improved predictions for all datasets, with more than 25% improvement from radar alone. Spatial predictions from fusion were also consistent with known habitat preferences for the birds demonstrating the potential of multi- sensor fusion in mapping habitat characteristics. The main contribution of this research was an improved understanding of lidar and multi-sensor fusion approaches for applications in carbon science and habitat studies

    The Detection of Forest Structures in the Monongahela National Forest Using LiDAR

    Get PDF
    The mapping of structural elements of a forest is important for forestry management to provide a baseline for old and new-growth trees while providing height strata for a stand. These activities are important for the overall monitoring process which aids in the understanding of anthropogenic and natural disturbances. Height information recorded for each discrete point is key for the creation of canopy height, canopy surface, and canopy cover models. The aim of this study is to assess if LiDAR can be used to determine forest structures. Small footprint, leaf-off LiDAR data were obtained for the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. This dataset was compared to Landsat imagery acquired for the same area. Each dataset endured supervised classifications and object oriented segmentation with random forest classifications. These approaches took into account derived variables such as, percentages of canopy height, canopy cover, stem density, and normalized difference vegetation index, which were converted from the original datasets. Evaluation of the study depicted that the classification of the Landsat data produced results ranging between 31.3 and 50.2%, whilst the LiDAR dataset produced accuracies ranging from 54.7 to 80.1%. The results of this study increase the potential of LiDAR to be used regularly as a forestry management technique and warrant future research

    Regional scale dryland vegetation classification with an integrated lidar-hyperspectral approach

    Get PDF
    The sparse canopy cover and large contribution of bright background soil, along with the heterogeneous vegetation types in close proximity, are common challenges for mapping dryland vegetation with remote sensing. Consequently, the results of a single classification algorithm or one type of sensor to characterize dryland vegetation typically show low accuracy and lack robustness. In our study, we improved classification accuracy in a semi-arid ecosystem based on the use of vegetation optical (hyperspectral) and structural (lidar) information combined with the environmental characteristics of the landscape. To accomplish this goal, we used both spectral angle mapper (SAM) and multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (MESMA) for optical vegetation classification. Lidar-derived maximum vegetation height and delineated riparian zones were then used to modify the optical classification. Incorporating the lidar information into the classification scheme increased the overall accuracy from 60% to 89%. Canopy structure can have a strong influence on spectral variability and the lidar provided complementary information for SAM’s sensitivity to shape but not magnitude of the spectra. Similar approaches to map large regions of drylands with low uncertainty may be readily implemented with unmixing algorithms applied to upcoming space-based imaging spectroscopy and lidar. This study advances our understanding of the nuances associated with mapping xeric and mesic regions, and highlights the importance of incorporating complementary algorithms and sensors to accurately characterize the heterogeneity of dryland ecosystems
    • 

    corecore