Effective representation of RT-LOTOS terms by finite time petri nets

The paper describes a transformational approach for the specification and formal verification of concurrent and real-time systems. At upper level, one system is specified using the timed process algebra RT-LOTOS. The output of the proposed transformation is a Time Petri net (TPN). The paper particularly shows how a TPN can be automatically constructed from an RT-LOTOS specification using a compositionally defined mapping. The proof of the translation consistency is sketched in the paper and developed in [1]. The RT-LOTOS to TPN translation patterns formalized in the paper are being implemented. in a prototype tool. This enables reusing TPNs verification techniques and tools for the profit of RT-LOTOS

Mapping RT-LOTOS specifications into Time Petri Nets

RT-LOTOS is a timed process algebra which enables compact and abstract specification of real-time systems. This paper proposes and illustrates a structural translation of RT-LOTOS terms into behaviorally equivalent (timed bisimilar) finite Time Petri nets. It is therefore possible to apply Time Petri nets verification techniques to the profit of RT-LOTOS. Our approach has been implemented in RTL2TPN, a prototype tool which takes as input an RT-LOTOS specification and outputs a TPN. The latter is verified using TINA, a TPN analyzer developed by LAAS-CNRS. The toolkit made of RTL2TPN and TINA has been positively benchmarked against previously developed RT-LOTOS verification tool

Testing real-time systems using TINA

The paper presents a technique for model-based black-box conformance testing of real-time systems using the Time Petri Net Analyzer TINA. Such test suites are derived from a prioritized time Petri net composed of two concurrent sub-nets specifying respectively the expected behaviour of the system under test and its environment.We describe how the toolbox TINA has been extended to support automatic generation of time-optimal test suites. The result is optimal in the sense that the set of test cases in the test suite have the shortest possible accumulated time to be executed. Input/output conformance serves as the notion of implementation correctness, essentially timed trace inclusion taking environment assumptions into account. Test cases selection is based either on using manually formulated test purposes or automatically from various coverage criteria specifying structural criteria of the model to be fulfilled by the test suite. We discuss how test purposes and coverage criterion are specified in the linear temporal logic SE-LTL, derive test sequences, and assign verdicts

From RT-LOTOS to Time Petri Nets new foundations for a verification platform

The formal description technique RT-LOTOS has been selected as intermediate language to add formality to a real-time UML profile named TURTLE. For this sake, an RT-LOTOS verification platform has been developed for early detection of design errors in real-time system models. The paper discusses an extension of the platform by inclusion of verification tools developed for Time Petri Nets. The starting point is the definition of RT-LOTOS to TPN translation patterns. In particular, we introduce the concept of components embedding Time Petri Nets. The translation patterns are implemented in a prototype tool which takes as input an RT-LOTOS specification and outputs a TPN in the format admitted by the TINA tool. The efficiency of the proposed solution has been demonstrated on various case studies

On the compared expressiveness of arc, place and transition time Petri nets

International audienceIn this paper, we consider safe Time Petri Nets where time intervals (strict and large) are associated with places (TPPN), arcs (TAPN) or transitions (TTPN). We give the formal strong and weak semantics of these models in terms of Timed Transition Systems. We compare the expressiveness of the six models w.r.t. (weak) timed bisimilarity (behavioral semantics). The main results of the paper are : (i) with strong semantics, TAPN is strictly more expressive than TPPN and TTPN ; (ii) with strong semantics TPPN and TTPN are incomparable ; (iii) TTPN with strong semantics and TTPN with weak semantics are incomparable. Moreover, we give a complete classification by a set of 9 relations explained in a figure

Waiting Nets: State Classes and Taxonomy

In time Petri nets (TPNs), time and control are tightly connected: time measurement for a transition starts only when all resources needed to fire it are available. Further, upper bounds on duration of enabledness can force transitions to fire (this is called urgency). For many systems, one wants to decouple control and time, i.e. start measuring time as soon as a part of the preset of a transition is filled, and fire it after some delay \underline{and} when all needed resources are available. This paper considers an extension of TPN called waiting nets that dissociates time measurement and control. Their semantics allows time measurement to start with incomplete presets, and can ignore urgency when upper bounds of intervals are reached but all resources needed to fire are not yet available. Firing of a transition is then allowed as soon as missing resources are available. It is known that extending bounded TPNs with stopwatches leads to undecidability. Our extension is weaker, and we show how to compute a finite state class graph for bounded waiting nets, yielding decidability of reachability and coverability. We then compare expressiveness of waiting nets with that of other models w.r.t. timed language equivalence, and show that they are strictly more expressive than TPNs

Undecidability of Coverability and Boundedness for Timed-Arc Petri Nets with Invariants

Timed-Arc Petri Nets (TAPN) is a well studied extension of the classical Petri net model where tokens are decorated with real numbers that represent their age. Unlike reachability, which is known to be undecidable for TAPN, boundedness and coverability remain decidable. The model is supported by a recent tool called TAPAAL which, among others, further extends TAPN with invariants on places in order to model urgency. The decidability of boundedness and coverability for this extended model has not yet been considered. We present a reduction from two-counter Minsky machines to TAPN with invariants to show that both the boundedness and coverability problems are undecidable