129,550 research outputs found
Counterfactual Learning from Bandit Feedback under Deterministic Logging: A Case Study in Statistical Machine Translation
The goal of counterfactual learning for statistical machine translation (SMT)
is to optimize a target SMT system from logged data that consist of user
feedback to translations that were predicted by another, historic SMT system. A
challenge arises by the fact that risk-averse commercial SMT systems
deterministically log the most probable translation. The lack of sufficient
exploration of the SMT output space seemingly contradicts the theoretical
requirements for counterfactual learning. We show that counterfactual learning
from deterministic bandit logs is possible nevertheless by smoothing out
deterministic components in learning. This can be achieved by additive and
multiplicative control variates that avoid degenerate behavior in empirical
risk minimization. Our simulation experiments show improvements of up to 2 BLEU
points by counterfactual learning from deterministic bandit feedback.Comment: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
(EMNLP), 2017, Copenhagen, Denmar
Improving the translation environment for professional translators
When using computer-aided translation systems in a typical, professional translation workflow, there are several stages at which there is room for improvement. The SCATE (Smart Computer-Aided Translation Environment) project investigated several of these aspects, both from a human-computer interaction point of view, as well as from a purely technological side.
This paper describes the SCATE research with respect to improved fuzzy matching, parallel treebanks, the integration of translation memories with machine translation, quality estimation, terminology extraction from comparable texts, the use of speech recognition in the translation process, and human computer interaction and interface design for the professional translation environment. For each of these topics, we describe the experiments we performed and the conclusions drawn, providing an overview of the highlights of the entire SCATE project
A Shared Task on Bandit Learning for Machine Translation
We introduce and describe the results of a novel shared task on bandit
learning for machine translation. The task was organized jointly by Amazon and
Heidelberg University for the first time at the Second Conference on Machine
Translation (WMT 2017). The goal of the task is to encourage research on
learning machine translation from weak user feedback instead of human
references or post-edits. On each of a sequence of rounds, a machine
translation system is required to propose a translation for an input, and
receives a real-valued estimate of the quality of the proposed translation for
learning. This paper describes the shared task's learning and evaluation setup,
using services hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS), the data and evaluation
metrics, and the results of various machine translation architectures and
learning protocols.Comment: Conference on Machine Translation (WMT) 201
A Type Language for Calendars
Time and calendars play an important role in databases,
on the Semantic Web, as well as in mobile computing. Temporal data
and calendars require (specific) modeling and processing tools. CaTTS
is a type language for calendar definitions using which one can model
and process temporal and calendric data. CaTTS is based on a "theory
reasoning" approach for efficiency reasons. This article addresses type
checking temporal and calendric data and constraints. A thesis underlying
CaTTS is that types and type checking are as useful and desirable
with calendric data types as with other data types. Types enable
(meaningful) annotation of data. Type checking enhances efficiency and
consistency of programming and modeling languages like database and
Web query languages
MLPerf Inference Benchmark
Machine-learning (ML) hardware and software system demand is burgeoning.
Driven by ML applications, the number of different ML inference systems has
exploded. Over 100 organizations are building ML inference chips, and the
systems that incorporate existing models span at least three orders of
magnitude in power consumption and five orders of magnitude in performance;
they range from embedded devices to data-center solutions. Fueling the hardware
are a dozen or more software frameworks and libraries. The myriad combinations
of ML hardware and ML software make assessing ML-system performance in an
architecture-neutral, representative, and reproducible manner challenging.
There is a clear need for industry-wide standard ML benchmarking and evaluation
criteria. MLPerf Inference answers that call. In this paper, we present our
benchmarking method for evaluating ML inference systems. Driven by more than 30
organizations as well as more than 200 ML engineers and practitioners, MLPerf
prescribes a set of rules and best practices to ensure comparability across
systems with wildly differing architectures. The first call for submissions
garnered more than 600 reproducible inference-performance measurements from 14
organizations, representing over 30 systems that showcase a wide range of
capabilities. The submissions attest to the benchmark's flexibility and
adaptability.Comment: ISCA 202
- …