71,779 research outputs found
Formal Development of Rough Inclusion Functions
Rough sets, developed by Pawlak [15], are important tool to describe situation of incomplete or partially unknown information. In this article, continuing the formalization of rough sets [12], we give the formal characterization of three rough inclusion functions (RIFs). We start with the standard one, ÎșÂŁ, connected with Ćukasiewicz [14], and extend this research for two additional RIFs: Îș 1, and Îș 2, following a paper by GomoliĆska [4], [3]. We also define q-RIFs and weak q-RIFs [2]. The paper establishes a formal counterpart of [7] and makes a preliminary step towards rough mereology [16], [17] in Mizar [13].Institute of Informatics, University of BiaĆystok, PolandAnna Gomolinska. A comparative study of some generalized rough approximations. Fundamenta Informaticae, 51:103â119, 2002.Anna Gomolinska. Rough approximation based on weak q-RIFs. In James F. Peters, Andrzej Skowron, Marcin Wolski, Mihir K. Chakraborty, and Wei-Zhi Wu, editors, Transactions on Rough Sets X, volume 5656 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 117â135, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-03281-3. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03281-3_4.Anna Gomolinska. On three closely related rough inclusion functions. In Marzena Kryszkiewicz, James F. Peters, Henryk Rybinski, and Andrzej Skowron, editors, Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms, volume 4585 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 142â151, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73451-2_16.Anna Gomolinska. On certain rough inclusion functions. In James F. Peters, Andrzej Skowron, and Henryk Rybinski, editors, Transactions on Rough Sets IX, volume 5390 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 35â55. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89876-4_3.Adam Grabowski. On the computer-assisted reasoning about rough sets. In B. Dunin-KÄplicz, A. Jankowski, A. Skowron, and M. Szczuka, editors, International Workshop on Monitoring, Security, and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems Location, volume 28 of Advances in Soft Computing, pages 215â226, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/3-540-32370-8_15.Adam Grabowski. Efficient rough set theory merging. Fundamenta Informaticae, 135(4): 371â385, 2014. doi:10.3233/FI-2014-1129.Adam Grabowski. Building a framework of rough inclusion functions by means of computerized proof assistant. In TamĂĄs MihĂĄlydeĂĄk, Fan Min, Guoyin Wang, Mohua Banerjee, Ivo DĂŒntsch, Zbigniew Suraj, and Davide Ciucci, editors, Rough Sets, volume 11499 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 225â238, Cham, 2019. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-030-22815-6. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22815-6_18.Adam Grabowski. Lattice theory for rough sets â a case study with Mizar. Fundamenta Informaticae, 147(2â3):223â240, 2016. doi:10.3233/FI-2016-1406.Adam Grabowski. Relational formal characterization of rough sets. Formalized Mathematics, 21(1):55â64, 2013. doi:10.2478/forma-2013-0006.Adam Grabowski. Binary relations-based rough sets â an automated approach. Formalized Mathematics, 24(2):143â155, 2016. doi:10.1515/forma-2016-0011.Adam Grabowski and Christoph Schwarzweller. On duplication in mathematical repositories. In Serge Autexier, Jacques Calmet, David Delahaye, Patrick D. F. Ion, Laurence Rideau, Renaud Rioboo, and Alan P. Sexton, editors, Intelligent Computer Mathematics, 10th International Conference, AISC 2010, 17th Symposium, Calculemus 2010, and 9th International Conference, MKM 2010, Paris, France, July 5â10, 2010. Proceedings, volume 6167 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 300â314. Springer, 2010. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14128-7_26.Adam Grabowski and MichaĆ Sielwiesiuk. Formalizing two generalized approximation operators. Formalized Mathematics, 26(2):183â191, 2018. doi:10.2478/forma-2018-0016.Adam Grabowski, Artur KorniĆowicz, and Adam Naumowicz. Four decades of Mizar. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 55(3):191â198, 2015. doi:10.1007/s10817-015-9345-1.Jan Ćukasiewicz. Die logischen Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. In L. Borkowski, editor, Jan Ćukasiewicz â Selected Works, pages 16â63. North Holland, Polish Scientific Publ., Amsterdam London Warsaw, 1970. First published in KrakĂłw, 1913.ZdzisĆaw Pawlak. Rough sets. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 11:341â356, 1982. doi:10.1007/BF01001956.Lech Polkowski. Rough mereology. In Approximate Reasoning by Parts, volume 20 of Intelligent Systems Reference Library, pages 229â257, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-22279-5. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22279-5_6.Lech Polkowski and Andrzej Skowron. Rough mereology: A new paradigm for approximate reasoning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 15(4):333â365, 1996. doi:10.1016/S0888-613X(96)00072-2.Andrzej Skowron and JarosĆaw Stepaniuk. Tolerance approximation spaces. Fundamenta Informaticae, 27(2/3):245â253, 1996. doi:10.3233/FI-1996-272311.William Zhu. Generalized rough sets based on relations. Information Sciences, 177: 4997â5011, 2007.27433734
Parametric matroid of rough set
Rough set is mainly concerned with the approximations of objects through an
equivalence relation on a universe. Matroid is a combinatorial generalization
of linear independence in vector spaces. In this paper, we define a parametric
set family, with any subset of a universe as its parameter, to connect rough
sets and matroids. On the one hand, for a universe and an equivalence relation
on the universe, a parametric set family is defined through the lower
approximation operator. This parametric set family is proved to satisfy the
independent set axiom of matroids, therefore it can generate a matroid, called
a parametric matroid of the rough set. Three equivalent representations of the
parametric set family are obtained. Moreover, the parametric matroid of the
rough set is proved to be the direct sum of a partition-circuit matroid and a
free matroid. On the other hand, since partition-circuit matroids were well
studied through the lower approximation number, we use it to investigate the
parametric matroid of the rough set. Several characteristics of the parametric
matroid of the rough set, such as independent sets, bases, circuits, the rank
function and the closure operator, are expressed by the lower approximation
number.Comment: 15 page
Covering matroid
In this paper, we propose a new type of matroids, namely covering matroids,
and investigate the connections with the second type of covering-based rough
sets and some existing special matroids. Firstly, as an extension of
partitions, coverings are more natural combinatorial objects and can sometimes
be more efficient to deal with problems in the real world. Through extending
partitions to coverings, we propose a new type of matroids called covering
matroids and prove them to be an extension of partition matroids. Secondly,
since some researchers have successfully applied partition matroids to
classical rough sets, we study the relationships between covering matroids and
covering-based rough sets which are an extension of classical rough sets.
Thirdly, in matroid theory, there are many special matroids, such as
transversal matroids, partition matroids, 2-circuit matroid and
partition-circuit matroids. The relationships among several special matroids
and covering matroids are studied.Comment: 15 page
Class Association Rules Mining based Rough Set Method
This paper investigates the mining of class association rules with rough set
approach. In data mining, an association occurs between two set of elements
when one element set happen together with another. A class association rule set
(CARs) is a subset of association rules with classes specified as their
consequences. We present an efficient algorithm for mining the finest class
rule set inspired form Apriori algorithm, where the support and confidence are
computed based on the elementary set of lower approximation included in the
property of rough set theory. Our proposed approach has been shown very
effective, where the rough set approach for class association discovery is much
simpler than the classic association method.Comment: 10 pages, 2 figure
Dealing with uncertain entities in ontology alignment using rough sets
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final published article is available from the link below. Copyright @ 2012 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.Ontology alignment facilitates exchange of knowledge among heterogeneous data sources. Many approaches to ontology alignment use multiple similarity measures to map entities between ontologies. However, it remains a key challenge in dealing with uncertain entities for which the employed ontology alignment measures produce conflicting results on similarity of the mapped entities. This paper presents OARS, a rough-set based approach to ontology alignment which achieves a high degree of accuracy in situations where uncertainty arises because of the conflicting results generated by different similarity measures. OARS employs a combinational approach and considers both lexical and structural similarity measures. OARS is extensively evaluated with the benchmark ontologies of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative (OAEI) 2010, and performs best in the aspect of recall in comparison with a number of alignment systems while generating a comparable performance in precision
The Effectiveness of Real Estate Market Versus Efficiency of Its Participants
This paper attempts to prove the following hypothesis: the effectiveness of a real estate market may be identified by analysing the effectiveness of its participants. The authors also discuss methods based on the rough set theory which can influence the efficiency and efficacy of market participants, and consequently, the effectiveness of the real estate market and its participants
- âŠ