2,026 research outputs found
Heuristic Ranking in Tightly Coupled Probabilistic Description Logics
The Semantic Web effort has steadily been gaining traction in the recent
years. In particular,Web search companies are recently realizing that their
products need to evolve towards having richer semantic search capabilities.
Description logics (DLs) have been adopted as the formal underpinnings for
Semantic Web languages used in describing ontologies. Reasoning under
uncertainty has recently taken a leading role in this arena, given the nature
of data found on theWeb. In this paper, we present a probabilistic extension of
the DL EL++ (which underlies the OWL2 EL profile) using Markov logic networks
(MLNs) as probabilistic semantics. This extension is tightly coupled, meaning
that probabilistic annotations in formulas can refer to objects in the
ontology. We show that, even though the tightly coupled nature of our language
means that many basic operations are data-intractable, we can leverage a
sublanguage of MLNs that allows to rank the atomic consequences of an ontology
relative to their probability values (called ranking queries) even when these
values are not fully computed. We present an anytime algorithm to answer
ranking queries, and provide an upper bound on the error that it incurs, as
well as a criterion to decide when results are guaranteed to be correct.Comment: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Conference on Uncertainty
in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2012
Practical Reasoning for Very Expressive Description Logics
Description Logics (DLs) are a family of knowledge representation formalisms
mainly characterised by constructors to build complex concepts and roles from
atomic ones. Expressive role constructors are important in many applications,
but can be computationally problematical. We present an algorithm that decides
satisfiability of the DL ALC extended with transitive and inverse roles and
functional restrictions with respect to general concept inclusion axioms and
role hierarchies; early experiments indicate that this algorithm is well-suited
for implementation. Additionally, we show that ALC extended with just
transitive and inverse roles is still in PSPACE. We investigate the limits of
decidability for this family of DLs, showing that relaxing the constraints
placed on the kinds of roles used in number restrictions leads to the
undecidability of all inference problems. Finally, we describe a number of
optimisation techniques that are crucial in obtaining implementations of the
decision procedures, which, despite the worst-case complexity of the problem,
exhibit good performance with real-life problems
Bisimulations on data graphs
Bisimulation provides structural conditions to characterize indistinguishability from an external observer between nodes on labeled graphs. It is a fundamental notion used in many areas, such as verification, graph-structured databases, and constraint satisfaction. However, several current applications use graphs where nodes also contain data (the so called “data graphs”), and where observers can test for equality or inequality of data values (e.g., asking the attribute ‘name’ of a node to be different from that of all its neighbors). The present work constitutes a first investigation of “data aware” bisimulations on data graphs. We study the problem of computing such bisimulations, based on the observational indistinguishability for XPath —a language that extends modal logics like PDL with tests for data equality— with and without transitive closure operators. We show that in general the problem is PSPACE-complete, but identify several restrictions that yield better complexity bounds (CO- NP, PTIME) by controlling suitable parameters of the problem, namely the amount of non-locality allowed, and the class of models considered (graphs, DAGs, trees). In particular, this analysis yields a hierarchy of tractable fragments.Fil: Abriola, Sergio Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias de la Computación. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias de la Computacion; ArgentinaFil: Barceló, Pablo. Universidad de Chile; ChileFil: Figueira, Diego. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaFil: Figueira, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias de la Computación. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias de la Computacion; Argentin
Logics for Unranked Trees: An Overview
Labeled unranked trees are used as a model of XML documents, and logical
languages for them have been studied actively over the past several years. Such
logics have different purposes: some are better suited for extracting data,
some for expressing navigational properties, and some make it easy to relate
complex properties of trees to the existence of tree automata for those
properties. Furthermore, logics differ significantly in their model-checking
properties, their automata models, and their behavior on ordered and unordered
trees. In this paper we present a survey of logics for unranked trees
Inductive Logic Programming in Databases: from Datalog to DL+log
In this paper we address an issue that has been brought to the attention of
the database community with the advent of the Semantic Web, i.e. the issue of
how ontologies (and semantics conveyed by them) can help solving typical
database problems, through a better understanding of KR aspects related to
databases. In particular, we investigate this issue from the ILP perspective by
considering two database problems, (i) the definition of views and (ii) the
definition of constraints, for a database whose schema is represented also by
means of an ontology. Both can be reformulated as ILP problems and can benefit
from the expressive and deductive power of the KR framework DL+log. We
illustrate the application scenarios by means of examples. Keywords: Inductive
Logic Programming, Relational Databases, Ontologies, Description Logics, Hybrid
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Systems. Note: To appear in Theory and
Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).Comment: 30 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables
Coalgebraic Reasoning with Global Assumptions in Arithmetic Modal Logics
We establish a generic upper bound ExpTime for reasoning with global
assumptions (also known as TBoxes) in coalgebraic modal logics. Unlike earlier
results of this kind, our bound does not require a tractable set of tableau
rules for the instance logics, so that the result applies to wider classes of
logics. Examples are Presburger modal logic, which extends graded modal logic
with linear inequalities over numbers of successors, and probabilistic modal
logic with polynomial inequalities over probabilities. We establish the
theoretical upper bound using a type elimination algorithm. We also provide a
global caching algorithm that potentially avoids building the entire
exponential-sized space of candidate states, and thus offers a basis for
practical reasoning. This algorithm still involves frequent fixpoint
computations; we show how these can be handled efficiently in a concrete
algorithm modelled on Liu and Smolka's linear-time fixpoint algorithm. Finally,
we show that the upper complexity bound is preserved under adding nominals to
the logic, i.e. in coalgebraic hybrid logic.Comment: Extended version of conference paper in FCT 201
Constraint-based semantics
Montague\u27s famous characterization of the homomorphic relation between syntax and semantics naturally gives way in computational applications to CONSTRAINT-BASED formulations. This was originally motivated by the close harmony it provides with syntax, which is universally processed in a constraint-based fashion. Employing the same processing discipline in syntax and semantics allows that their processing (and indeed other processing) can be as tightly coupled as one wishes - indeed, there needn\u27t be any fundamental distinction between them at all. In this paper, we point out several advantages of the constraint-based view of semantics processing over standard views. These include (i) the opportunity to incorporate nonsyntactic constraints on semantics, such as those arising from phonology and context; (ii) the opportunity to formulate principles which generalize over syntax and semantics, such as those found in HEAD-DRIVEN PHRASE STRUCTURE GRAMMAR; (iii) a characterization of semantic ambiguity, which in turn provides a framework in which to describe disambiguation, and (iv) the opportunity to underspecify meanings in a way difficult to reconcile with other views. The last point is illustrated with an application to scope ambiguity in which a scheme is developed which underspecifies scope but eschews auxiliary levels of logical form
- …