Discrete and fuzzy dynamical genetic programming in the XCSF learning classifier system

A number of representation schemes have been presented for use within learning classifier systems, ranging from binary encodings to neural networks. This paper presents results from an investigation into using discrete and fuzzy dynamical system representations within the XCSF learning classifier system. In particular, asynchronous random Boolean networks are used to represent the traditional condition-action production system rules in the discrete case and asynchronous fuzzy logic networks in the continuous-valued case. It is shown possible to use self-adaptive, open-ended evolution to design an ensemble of such dynamical systems within XCSF to solve a number of well-known test problems

A Cognitive Architecture Based on a Learning Classifier System with Spiking Classifiers

© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York. Learning classifier systems (LCS) are population-based reinforcement learners that were originally designed to model various cognitive phenomena. This paper presents an explicitly cognitive LCS by using spiking neural networks as classifiers, providing each classifier with a measure of temporal dynamism. We employ a constructivist model of growth of both neurons and synaptic connections, which permits a genetic algorithm to automatically evolve sufficiently-complex neural structures. The spiking classifiers are coupled with a temporally-sensitive reinforcement learning algorithm, which allows the system to perform temporal state decomposition by appropriately rewarding “macro-actions”, created by chaining together multiple atomic actions. The combination of temporal reinforcement learning and neural information processing is shown to outperform benchmark neural classifier systems, and successfully solve a robotic navigation task

A brief history of learning classifier systems: from CS-1 to XCS and its variants

© 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. The direction set by Wilson’s XCS is that modern Learning Classifier Systems can be characterized by their use of rule accuracy as the utility metric for the search algorithm(s) discovering useful rules. Such searching typically takes place within the restricted space of co-active rules for efficiency. This paper gives an overview of the evolution of Learning Classifier Systems up to XCS, and then of some of the subsequent developments of Wilson’s algorithm to different types of learning

SupRB: A Supervised Rule-based Learning System for Continuous Problems

We propose the SupRB learning system, a new Pittsburgh-style learning classifier system (LCS) for supervised learning on multi-dimensional continuous decision problems. SupRB learns an approximation of a quality function from examples (consisting of situations, choices and associated qualities) and is then able to make an optimal choice as well as predict the quality of a choice in a given situation. One area of application for SupRB is parametrization of industrial machinery. In this field, acceptance of the recommendations of machine learning systems is highly reliant on operators' trust. While an essential and much-researched ingredient for that trust is prediction quality, it seems that this alone is not enough. At least as important is a human-understandable explanation of the reasoning behind a recommendation. While many state-of-the-art methods such as artificial neural networks fall short of this, LCSs such as SupRB provide human-readable rules that can be understood very easily. The prevalent LCSs are not directly applicable to this problem as they lack support for continuous choices. This paper lays the foundations for SupRB and shows its general applicability on a simplified model of an additive manufacturing problem.Comment: Submitted to the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2020 (GECCO 2020