3,422 research outputs found

    Experimental Economics: Contributions, Recent Developments, and New Challenges

    Get PDF
    Although economics has long been considered as a non-experimental science, the development of experimental economics and behavioral economics is amazingly rapid and affects most fields of research. This paper first attempts at defining the main contributions of experiments to economics. It also identifies four main trends in the development of experimental research in economics. The third contribution of this paper is to identify the major theoretical and methodological challenges faced by behavioral and experimental economics.behavioral economy ; Experimental economics ; field experiment ; quantitative methods

    Experimental Economics: Contributions, Recent Developments, and New Challenges

    Get PDF
    Although economics has long been considered as a non-experimental science, the development of experimental economics and behavioral economics is amazingly rapid and affects most fields of research. This paper first attempts at defining the main contributions of experiments to economics. It also identifies four main trends in the development of experimental research in economics. The third contribution of this paper is to identify the major theoretical and methodological challenges faced by behavioral and experimental economics.experimental economics; neuroeconomics; quantitative methods; field experiments

    Human centric situational awareness

    Get PDF
    Context awareness is an approach that has been receiving increasing focus in the past years. A context aware device can understand surrounding conditions and adapt its behavior accordingly to meet user demands. Mobile handheld devices offer a motivating platform for context aware applications as a result of their rapidly growing set of features and sensing abilities. This research aims at building a situational awareness model that utilizes multimodal sensor data provided through the various sensing capabilities available on a wide range of current handheld smart phones. The model will make use of seven different virtual and physical sensors commonly available on mobile devices, to gather a large set of parameters that identify the occurrence of a situation for one of five predefined context scenarios: In meeting, Driving, in party, In Theatre and Sleeping. As means of gathering the wisdom of the crowd and in an effort to reach a habitat sensitive awareness model, a survey was conducted to understand the user perception of each context situation. The data collected was used to build the inference engine of a prototype context awareness system utilizing context weights introduced in [39] and the confidence metric in [26] with some variation as a means for reasoning. The developed prototype\u27s results were benchmarked against two existing context awareness platforms Darwin Phones [17] and Smart Profile [11], where the prototype was able to acquire 5% and 7.6% higher accuracy levels than the two systems respectively while performing tasks of higher complexity. The detailed results and evaluation are highlighted further in section 6.4

    Expertise in unexpected places: selective social learning from counter-normative experts

    Get PDF
    Previous research demonstrates that children prefer to use information given by people of their own gender when learning about their environment. However, young children are also very sensitive to the specialized knowledge, or expertise, of others. The present work explored whether children are willing to learn from an expert informant who displays non - traditional gender role interests. Four- to 8-year-olds were presented with conflicting opinions about a piece of domain specific information from a counter-stereotypical expert (e.g., a boy with expertise in ballet), as well as a layperson of the opposite gender (e.g., a girl with little knowledge about ballet). Participants were asked to choose who they believed was correct, who they would prefer to learn from in the future, and how much they liked each character. Overall, participants selected the counter-stereotypical expert as correct. However, 4- to 5-year-olds reported a preference to learn from same-gender participants in the future irrespective of their expertise, whereas 6- to 8-year-olds reported wanting to learn from the counter-stereotypical expert in the future. Gender differences also emerged, with boys of all ages showing greater acceptance of the opinion of a male counter-stereotypical expert as compared to a female counter-stereotypical expert. These results demonstrate that while expertise is a powerful learning cue, there are circumstances in which expert testimony may be disregarded in favor of potent social categorical biases

    Machine learning for smart building applications: Review and taxonomy

    Get PDF
    © 2019 Association for Computing Machinery. The use of machine learning (ML) in smart building applications is reviewed in this article. We split existing solutions into two main classes: occupant-centric versus energy/devices-centric. The first class groups solutions that use ML for aspects related to the occupants, including (1) occupancy estimation and identification, (2) activity recognition, and (3) estimating preferences and behavior. The second class groups solutions that use ML to estimate aspects related either to energy or devices. They are divided into three categories: (1) energy profiling and demand estimation, (2) appliances profiling and fault detection, and (3) inference on sensors. Solutions in each category are presented, discussed, and compared; open perspectives and research trends are discussed as well. Compared to related state-of-the-art survey papers, the contribution herein is to provide a comprehensive and holistic review from the ML perspectives rather than architectural and technical aspects of existing building management systems. This is by considering all types of ML tools, buildings, and several categories of applications, and by structuring the taxonomy accordingly. The article ends with a summary discussion of the presented works, with focus on lessons learned, challenges, open and future directions of research in this field

    Lab Labor: What Can Labor Economists Learn from the Lab?

    Get PDF
    This paper surveys the contributions of laboratory experiments to labor economics. We begin with a discussion of methodological issues: why (and when) is a lab experiment the best approach; how do laboratory experiments compare to field experiments; and what are the main design issues? We then summarize the substantive contributions of laboratory experiments to our understanding of principal-agent interactions, social preferences, union-firm bargaining, arbitration, gender differentials, discrimination, job search, and labor markets more generally.personnel economics, principal-agent theory, laboratory experiments, labor economics
    corecore