2,478 research outputs found
Special Session on Industry 4.0
No abstract available
Responsive Production in Manufacturing: A Modular Architecture
[EN] This paper proposes an architecture aiming at promoting the convergence of the physical and digital worlds, through CPS and IoT technologies, to accommodate more customized and higher quality products following Industry 4.0 concepts. The architecture combines concepts such as cyber-physical systems, decentralization, modularity and scalability aiming at responsive production. Combining these aspects with virtualization, contextualization, modeling and simulation capabilities it will enable self-adaptation, situational awareness and decentralized decision-making to answer dynamic market demands and support the design and reconfiguration of the manufacturing enterprise.The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union H2020 project C2 NET (FoF-01-2014) nr 636909.Marques, M.; Agostinho, C.; Zacharewicz, G.; Poler, R.; Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2018). Responsive Production in Manufacturing: A Modular Architecture. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 140:231-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78437-3_10S231254140European Commission: For a European Industrial Renaissance, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (2014)Hartmann, B., King, W.P., Narayanan, S.: Digital manufacturing: the revolution will be virtualized. McKinsey & Company (2015)European Forum for Manufacture: Driving Innovation and Growth in European Manufacturing (2015)European Factories of the Future Research Association (EFFRA): Factories of the Future: Multi-annual Roadmap for the Contractual PPP under the Horizon 2020 (2013)European Commission: Horizon 2020âWork Programme 2016â2017: 17. Cross-cutting Activities (2016)Schlaepfer, R.C., Koch, M., Merkofer, P.: Industry 4.0 challenges and solutions for the digital transformation and use of exponential technologies. Deloitte AG (2015)7iD: Industry 4.0. https://www.7id.com/technology/industry-4-0/ (2016)European Commission: Horizon 2020âWork Program 2016-2017âCross-cutting Activities, 25 July 2016EFFRA: Factories of the Future: Multi-annual Roadmap for the Contractual PPP under the Horizon 2020 (2013)FInES Research Roadmap Task Force (2012)Jacinto, J.: Smart manufacturing? Industry 4.0? Whatâs it all about? Siements Totally Integrated Automation, Automation World & Design World (2014)Monostori, L.: Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP 17, 9â13 (2014)Adolphs, P.: RAMI 4.0âAn architectural Model for Industrie 4.0. Platform Industrie 4.0 (2015)Collins, M.: Why America has a shortage of skilled workers. Industry Week (2015)Forbes, J., Naujok, N., Geissbauer, R., Vedso, J., Schrauf, S.: Industry 4.0: building the digital enterprise. PWC (2016)World Economic Forum Industrial Internet Survey (2014)Chen, D., Vernadat, F.B.: Enterprise interoperability: a standardisation view. Enterprise Inter- and Intra-Organizational Integration, Volume 108 of the series IFIPâThe International Federation for Information Processing, pp. 273â282 (2003)Yan, L., Li, Z., Yuan, X.: Study on method-of-robust-multidisciplinary-design-collaborative-decision for product design. Inf. Technol. J. 8(4), 441â452 (2009)Ruiz Dominguez, G. A.: CaractĂ©risation de lâactivitĂ© de conception collaborative Ă distance: Ă©tude des effets de synchronisation cognitive (2005)Jung, J.J.: Reusing ontology mappings for query routing in semantic peer-to-peer environment. Inf. Sci. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.04.018Ranjan, R., Zhao, L., Wu, X., Liu, A., Quiroz, A., Parashar, M.: Peer-to-Peer Cloud Provisioning: Service Discovery and Load-Balancing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-241-4_12Agostinho, C., Pinto, P., Jardim-goncalves, R.: Dynamic adaptors to support model-driven interoperability and enhance sensing enterprise networks. In: 19th World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFACâ14), Cape Town, South Africa (2014)Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., Vernadat, F.: Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: past, present and future. Comput. Ind. 59, 647â659 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.12.016Ducq, Y., Chen, D., Alix, T.: Principles of servitization and definition of an architecture for model driven service system engineering. In: 4th International IFIP Working Conference on Enterprise Interoperability (IWEI 2012), Harbin, China, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33068-17_12ElvesĂŠter, B., Hahn, A., Berre, A., Neple, T.: Towards an interoperability framework for model-driven development of software systems. In: 1st International Conference on Interoperability Enterprise Software and Applications. Springer. http://www.springerlink.com/index/L10NU4306N054T6G.pdf (2005)OMG: MDA Guide Version 1.0.1 (omg/2003-06-01), Object Management Group. http://www.omg.org/cgibin/doc?omg/03-06-01.pdf (2003)Agostinho, C., Ducq, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Sarraipa, J., Lampathaki, F., Poler, R., Jardim-Goncalves, R.: Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Comput. Ind. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.001Santucci, G., Martinez, C., Vlad-cĂąlcic, D.: The sensing enterprise. In: FInES Work. FIA 2012, Aalborg, Denmark. http://www.theinternetofthings.eu/sites/default/files/%5Buser-name%5D/Sensing-enterprise.pdf (2012)Sriram, R.: Smart networked systems and societies: what will the future look like? In: IEEE IT Professional Conference (IT Pro). IEEE Computer Society (2014)Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., et al.: Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/big_data_the_next_frontier_for_innovation (2011)Zacharewicz, G., Diallo, S., Ducq, Y., Agostinho, C., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Bazoun, H., Wang, Z., Doumeingts, G.: Model-based approaches for interoperability of next generation enterprise information systems: state of the art and future challenges. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0317-8Jardim-Goncalves, R., Agostinho, C., Steiger-Garcao, A.: A reference model for sustainable interoperability in networked enterprises: towards the foundation of EI science base. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 25(10) (2012). (Special Issue on Collaborative Manufacturing and Supply Chains). https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2011.653831Schatsky, D., Muraskin, C.: Blockchain is coming to disrupt your industry. Deloitte (2015)Shi, J., Wan, J., Yan, H., Suo, H.: A survey of cyber-physical systems. In: International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing, pp. 1â6 (2011)Rajkumar, R.: Workshop report on foundations for innovation in cyber-physical systems. NIST. http://www.nist.gov/el/upload/CPS-WorkshopReport-1-30-13-Final.pdf/ (2013)Lee, J., Lapira, E., Yang, S. Kao, H.-A.: Predictive manufacturing system trends of next generation production systems. In: 11th IFAC Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 150â156 (2013)IDC: The digital universe of opportunities: rich data and increasing value of the internet of things. EMC Digital Universe. emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/idc-digital-universe-2014.pdf . (2014)Baheti, R., Gill, H.: Cyber-physical systems. Impact Control Technol. 1â6 (2011)Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.-A.: A cyber physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing system. Manuf. Lett. 2015, 3, 18â23 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001Bagheri, B., Lee, J.: Big future for cyber-physical manufacturing systems. Design World. http://www.designworldonline.com/big-future-for-cyber-physical-manufacturing-systems/ (2015)Lucke, D., Constantinescu, C., WestkĂ€mper, E.: Smart factory-a step towards the next generation of manufacturing. Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier, pp. 115â118. Springer, London (2008)Weiser, M.: The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, Special Issue on Communications. Comput. Netw. (1991)WestkĂ€mper, E., Jendoubi, L., Eissele, M., Ertl, T.: Smart factoryâbridging the gap between digital planning and reality. Manuf. Syst. 35(4), 307â314 (2006)Goryachev, A., Kozhevnikov, S., Kolbova, E., Kuznetsov, O., Simonova, E., Skobelev, P., Tsarev, A., Shepilov, Y.: Smart factory: intelligent system for workshop resource allocation, scheduling, optimization and controlling in real time. Adv. Mater. Res. 630, 508â513 (2012)Agostinho, C., Marques-Lucena, C., Sesana, M., Felic, A., Fischer, K., Rubattino, C., Sarraipa, J.: Osmosis process development for innovative product design and validation. 2015 ASME IMECE, Houston, USA (2015)Ko, J., Lee, B., Lee, K., Hong, S.G., Kim, N., Paek, J.: Sensor virtualization module: virtualizing IoT devices on mobile smartphones for effective sensor data management. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/730762Guo, T., Papaioannou, T.G., Aberer, K.: Efficient indexing and query processing of model-view sensor data in the cloud. J. Big Data Res. 1, 52â65 (2014)Kumra, S., Sharma, L., Khanna, Y., Chattri, A.: Analysing an industrial automation pyramid and providing service oriented architecture. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 3(5), 586â594 (2012)Endsley, M.: Design and evaluation for situational awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting. HFES, Santa Monica, pp. 97â10 (1988)Stanton, N.A., Chambers, P.R., Piggott, J.: Situational awareness and safety. Saf. Sci. 39(3), 189â204 (2001)Endsley, M.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors (The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society) 37, 32â64 (1995)Bedny, G., Meister, D.: Theory of activity and situation awareness. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 3(1), 63â72 (1999)Smith, K., Hancock, P.A.: Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Hum. Factors (The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society) 37(1), 137â148 (1995)Ranganathan, A., Campbell, R.H.: An infrastructure for context-awareness based on first order logic. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 7(6), 353â364 (2003)Ning, K., Scholze, S., Marques, M., Campos, A, Neves-Silva, R. OâSullivan, D.: A service oriented platform for context aware knowledge enhancing. In: 5th IFAC Conference on Management and Control of Production and Logistics (2010)Marques, M., Sucic, B., Vuk, T.: Context-based decision support for sustainable optimization of energy consumption. KES Trans. Sustain. Des. Manuf. 1(1), 899â910 (2014)Schneeweiss, C.: Distributed decision making in supply chain management. Int. J. Product. Econ. 84, 71â83 (2003)Alemany, M.M.E., AlarcĂłn, F., Lario, F.C., Boj, J.J.: An application to support the temporal and spatial distributed decision-making process in supply chain collaborative planning. Comput. Ind. 62(5), 519â540 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2011.02.002Hong, I.H., Ammons, J.C., Realff, M.J.: Centralized versus decentralized decision-making for recycled material flows. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(4), 1172â1177 (2008)Pibernik, R., Sucky, E.: An approach to inter-domain master planning in supply chains. Int. J. Product. Econ. 108, 200â212 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.010Lee, H., Whang, S.: Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains: incentives and information. Manag. Sci. 45(5), 633â640 (1999)Jung, H., Chen, F., Jeong, B.: Decentralized supply chain planning framework for third party logistics partnership. Comput. Ind. Eng. 55(2), 348â364 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.017Wang, K.-J., Chen, M.-J.: Cooperative capacity planning and resource allocation by mutual outsourcing using ant algorithm in a decentralized supply chain. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 2831â2842 (2009)Simon, H.A.: The Science of the Artificial, 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, (1969). (3rd ed. in 1996, MIT Press)Mesarovic, M.D., Masko, D., Takahara, Y.: Theory of Hierarchical Multilevel Systems. Academic Press, New York and London (1970)Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.J.: Collaborative networks: a new scientific discipline. J. Intell. Manuf. 16(4), 439â452 (2005)Popplewell, K., Stojanovic, N., Abecker, A., Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G., Harding, J.: Supporting adaptive enterprise collaboration through semantic knowledge services. In: Enterprise Interoperability Iii: New Challenges and Industrial Approaches, pp. 381â393 (2008). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-221-0_30Agostinho, C., Ducq, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Sarraipa, J., Lampathaki, F., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Poler, R.: Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Accepted for Publication at Computers in Industry. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.001Agostinho, C., Jardim-Gonçalves, R.: Sustaining interoperability of networked liquid-sensing enterprises: a complex systems perspective. Annu. Rev. Control 39, 128â143 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2015.03.012Weichhart, G., Molina, A., Chen, D., Whitman, L. E., Vernadat, F.: Challenges and current developments for sensing, smart and sustainable enterprise systems. Computers in Industry (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.002Weichhart, G.: Supporting Interoperability for Chaotic and Complex Adaptive Enterprise Systems. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops. Confederated International Workshops: OTM Academy, OTM Industry Case Studies Program, ACM, EI2N, ISDE, META4eS, ORM, SeDeS, SINCOM, SMS, and SOMOCO 2013. Proceedings: LNCS 8186, 86â92. (2013). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41033-8_14Truex, D.P., Baskerville, R., Klein, H.: Growing systems in emergent organizations. Mag. Commun. ACM CACM Homepage Arch. 42(8), 117â123 (1999)Weiberg, S.: Facilitating collaborative decision-making in six steps. International Association of Facilitators Annual Meeting, pp. 14â15 (1999)Delbecq, A.L., VandeVen, A.H.: A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 7, 466â492 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637100700404Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA (1980
Engineering of next generation cyber-physical automation system architectures
Cyber-Physical-Systems (CPS) enable flexible and reconfigurable realization
of automation system architectures, utilizing distributed control architectures
with non-hierarchical modules linked together through different communication
systems. Several control system architectures have been developed and validated in
the past years by research groups. However, there is still a lack of implementation
in industry. The intention of this work is to provide a summary of current alternative
control system architectures that could be applied in industrial automation domain
as well as a review of their commonalities. The aim is to point out the differences
between the traditional centralized and hierarchical architectures to discussed ones,
which rely on decentralized decision-making and control. Challenges and impacts
that industries and engineers face in the process of adopting decentralized control
architectures are discussed, analysing the obstacles for industrial acceptance and the
new necessary interdisciplinary engineering skills. Finally, an outlook of possible
mitigation and migration actions required to implement the decentralized control
architectures is addressed.The authors would like to thank the European Commission for the support,
and the partners of the EU Horizon 2020 project PERFoRM (2016b) for the fruitful discussions.
The PERFoRM project has received funding from the European Unionâs Horizon 2020 research
and innovation programme under grant agreement No 680435.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Phenolic profiling, biological activities and in silico studies of Acacia tortilis (Forssk.) Hayne ssp. raddiana extracts
The authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and
Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial support through national
funds FCT/MCTES to CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020). L. Barros and R. C.
Calhelha thank the national funding by the FCT, P.I., through the institutional
scientific employment program-contract for their contracts.
M. Carocho also thanks the project ValorNatural for his research contract.
The authors are also grateful to the FEDER-Interreg España-
Portugal programme for financial support through the project
0377_Iberphenol_6_E.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Perspectives of Integrated âNext Industrial Revolutionâ Clusters in Poland and Siberia
RozdziaĆ z: Functioning of the Local Production Systems in Central and Eastern European Countries and Siberia. Case Studies and Comparative Studies, ed. Mariusz E. SokoĆowicz.The paper presents the mapping of potential next industrial revolution clusters in Poland and Siberia. Deindustrialization of the cities and struggles with its consequences are one of the fundamental economic problems in current global economy. Some hope to find an answer to that problem is associated with the idea of next industrial revolution and reindustrialization initiatives. In the paper, projects aimed at developing next industrial revolution clusters are analyzed. The objective of the research was to examine new industrial revolution paradigm as a platform for establishing university-based trans-border industry clusters in Poland and Siberia47 and to raise awareness of next industry revolution initiatives.Monograph financed under a contract of execution of the international scientific project within 7th Framework Programme of the European Union, co-financed by Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (title: âFunctioning of the Local Production Systems in the Conditions of Economic Crisis (Comparative Analysis and Benchmarking for the EU and Beyondâ)). Monografia sfinansowana w oparciu o umowÄ o wykonanie projektu miÄdzy narodowego w ramach 7. Programu Ramowego UE, wspĂłĆfinansowanego ze ĆrodkĂłw Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa WyĆŒszego (tytuĆ projektu: âFunkcjonowanie lokalnych systemĂłw produkcyjnych w warunkach kryzysu gospodarczego (analiza porĂłwnawcza i benchmarking w wybranych krajach UE oraz krajach trzecichâ))
Design choices for next-generation IIoT-connected MES/MOM:An empirical study on smart factories
The role of enterprise information systems is becoming increasingly crucial for improving customer responsiveness in the manufacturing industry. However, manufacturers engaged in mass customization are currently facing challenges related to implementing Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) concepts of Industry 4.0 in order to increase responsiveness. In this article, we apply the findings from a two-year design science study to establish the role of manufacturing execution systems/manufacturing operations management (MES/MOM) in an IIoT-enabled brownfield manufacturing enterprise. We also present design recommendations for developing next-generation MES/MOM as a strong core to make factories smart and responsive. First, we analyze the architectural design challenges of MES/MOM in IIoT through a selective literature review. We then present an exploratory case study in which we implement our homegrown MES/MOM data model design based on ISA 95 in Aalborg University's Smart Production Lab, which is a reconfigurable cyber-physical production system. This was achieved through the use of a custom module for the open-source Odoo ERP platform (mainly version 14). Finally, we enrich our case study with three industrial design demonstrators and combine the findings with a quality function deployment (QFD) method to determine design requirements for next-generation IIoT-connected MES/MOM. The results from our QFD analysis indicate that interoperability is the most important characteristic when designing a responsive smart factory, with the highest relative importance of 31% of the eight characteristics we studied
A Modular Test Bed for Reinforcement Learning Incorporation into Industrial Applications
This application paper explores the potential of using reinforcement learning
(RL) to address the demands of Industry 4.0, including shorter time-to-market,
mass customization, and batch size one production. Specifically, we present a
use case in which the task is to transport and assemble goods through a model
factory following predefined rules. Each simulation run involves placing a
specific number of goods of random color at the entry point. The objective is
to transport the goods to the assembly station, where two rivets are installed
in each product, connecting the upper part to the lower part. Following the
installation of rivets, blue products must be transported to the exit, while
green products are to be transported to storage. The study focuses on the
application of reinforcement learning techniques to address this problem and
improve the efficiency of the production process.Comment: Submitted and accepted version to the 5th International Data Science
Conference (iDSC), Krems, Austri
Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0
In the context of Industry 4.0, the manufacturing-related processes have shifted from conventional processes within one organization to collaborative processes cross different organizations, for example, product design processes, manufacturing processes, and maintenance processes across different factories and enterprises. The development and application of the Internet of things, i.e. smart devices and sensors increases the availability and collection of diverse data. With new technologies, such as advanced data analytics and cloud computing provide new opportunities for flexible collaborations as well as effective optimizing manufacturing-related processes, e.g. predictive maintenance. Predictive maintenance provides a detailed examination of the detection, location and diagnosis of faults in related machinery using various analyses. RAMI4.0 is a framework for thinking about the various efforts that constitute Industry 4.0. It spans the entire product life cycle & value stream axis, hierarchical structure axis and functional classification axis. The Industrial Data Space (now International Data Space) is a virtual data space using standards and common governance models to facilitate the secure exchange and easy linkage of data in business ecosystems. It thereby provides a basis for creating and using smart services and innovative business processes, while at the same time ensuring digital sovereignty of data owners. This paper looks at how to support predictive maintenance in the context of Industry 4.0. Especially, applying RAMI4.0 architecture supports the predictive maintenance using the FIWARE framework, which leads to deal with data exchanging among different organizations with different security requirements as well as modularizing of related functions
- âŠ